Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Programming sucks

@programming_sucks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

93subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394156920
TypeChannel
Username@programming_sucks
DescriptionКогда вы меняете направление всех стрелок в конусе, вы получаете коконус.
Created22 November 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/programming_sucks

Growth

937 August 2026 — 93 subscribers9 August 2026 — 93 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92–94 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 13:3193no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:2293first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
15
Links
208

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC66 viewsread 9 August 2026

ChatGPT's image generator can be easily manipulated to produce violent and sexually explicit content without users directly requesting it. The findings ... raises questions around why these models are trained on these images in the first place. (😱) https://mindgard.ai/blog/chatgpt-spontaneously-generated-violent-images-from-a-viral-prompt

27 Jun 2026, 03:54 UTC141 viewsread 9 August 2026

The font shaping engine HarfBuzz, used in applications such as Firefox and Chrome, comes with a Wasm shaper allowing arbitrary code to be used to "shape" text. In particular, this "arbitrary" code could in principle be an entire LLM inference engine... (💊) https://fuglede.github.io/llama.ttf/

11 Jun 2026, 13:50 UTC139 viewsread 9 August 2026

A nation that possesses powerful AI facing one without it—or even facing one that is behind in AI by 3 years—could be the equivalent of an army of World War II Marines facing an army of medieval swordsmen. ... Democracies should seek to form a global coalition centered on building AI according to their common values, iteratively trying to draw in the rest of the world by making it more and more attractive to be part

20 May 2026, 06:31 UTC128 viewsread 9 August 2026

The future of programming won’t be languages easiest for humans. It’ll be languages easiest for agents. (😱) https://medium.com/@NMitchem/if-ai-writes-your-code-why-use-python-bf8c4ba1a055

19 May 2026, 14:27 UTC128 viewsread 9 August 2026

...одни и те же качества людей оцениваются по-разному, в зависимости от иерархии. У руководителя жесткость - это про умение принимать решения, а у подчиненного - это уже токсичность и агрессивность. Настойчивость у руководителя - это лидерский скилл, а у нижестоящего – конфликтность и упрямство. Желание спорить за ресурсы у начальников называется стратегическим мышлением, а у нижестоящих - неумением работать в коман

12 May 2026, 21:00 UTC124 viewsread 9 August 2026

Помню спор на работе о машинном переводе. Я доказывала, что это дёшево — в том смысле, в каком бывает дёшево всё, что притворяется дорогим. Что бренд, годами выстраивающий собственный голос, не может вдруг заговорить голосом усреднённой вероятности. Что в тексте должны быть ошибки, просторечия, ощущение живого человека за каждым словом — иначе это не текст, а его имитация, причём имитация, которая обманывает в первую

12 May 2026, 20:27 UTCviews —

Programming sucks pinned «Simplicity is a great virtue but it requires hard work to achieve it and education to appreciate it. And to make matters worse: complexity sells better. (с) Dijkstra, раскопано https://t.me/emacsway_log/1349»

12 May 2026, 13:38 UTC100 viewsread 9 August 2026

Enterprise AI bills are climbing as fast as adoption (с) https://about.gitlab.com/blog/gitlab-act-2/ letter on restructuring

9 May 2026, 16:26 UTC140 viewsread 9 August 2026

...коллеги обсуждают покупку Mac Studio со встроенной памятью 128 гигабайт. Стоит он от 5 до 7 тысяч долларов. Купить такую дорогую вещь, чтобы генерить на ней неработающие скрипты? На этом месте к горлу подкатывает тошнота. В моем понимании это то же самое, что купить животное и покалечить его. Или купить книгу и распотрошить её. Что-то настолько мерзкое и низкое, что даже не хочется думать. Одновременное ухудшение

4 May 2026, 12:45 UTC135 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

A helpful analogy is to compare forms of technical debt to types of financial debt. Some tech debt is like credit card debt—small shortcuts and hacks (say, hard-coded fixes or skipping tests) that yield quick gains but accrue high interest if not paid off. Other debt is more like a long-term loan or mortgage—a conscious trade-off, such as choosing a simple architecture to meet a deadline, knowing you’ll have to inve

4 May 2026, 11:20 UTC106 viewsread 9 August 2026

Writing a terminal user interface is not rocket science per se. You just have to pick your poison. (c) https://mariozechner.at/posts/2025-11-30-pi-coding-agent/

30 Apr 2026, 08:30 UTC124 viewsread 9 August 2026

We retired the “Nerdy” personality in March after launching GPT‑5.4. In training, we removed the goblin-affine reward signal and filtered training data containing creature-words, making goblins less likely to over-appear or show up in inappropriate contexts. Unfortunately, GPT‑5.5 started training before we found the root cause of the goblins. When we began testing GPT‑5.5 in Codex, OpenAI employees immediately notic

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @programming_sucks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Programming sucks” (@programming_sucks), 93 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/programming_sucks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.