New video: ChatGPT Work vs Chat vs Codex These three modes can be confusing. In this video, I explain how they differ and show when you should use each one. The simple version: Chat = quick answers and ideas Work = multi-step projects and deliverables Codex = building and working with software Watch here: https://youtu.be/TDZ0FKHP5ts Which one do you use most?

Channel
proflead — AI News & Tools for Devs
@profleaddev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
68subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002074470938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @profleaddev |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/profleaddev |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 04:01 | 68 | +2 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 66 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 67 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 66 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 66 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 52s
- Average length
- 57s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
OpenAI Codex Ambassador Program: Complete Guide What does a Codex Ambassador do? Who can apply? How much time does it require? I created a simple guide with: - Program details - Current application status - Preparation advice - Official links and FAQ - Photos and lessons from my Codex event in Chiang Mai Read it here: https://proflead.dev/posts/openai-codex-ambassador-program/ If you are in Thailand, follow…
More cool stuff from OpenAI just arrived! 🫰 I received some Codex Ambassador swag and a postcard from Romain Huet and the OpenAI team. Thank you for this. I’m proud and happy to be part of the Codex Ambassador journey and excited about what’s ahead! For updates about upcoming Codex events, workshops, hackathons, and other activities, visit: https://proflead.dev/codex/ P.S. The unboxing video will be available soo…
New AI News for Developers The main updates from July 19–26: • OpenAI improves Codex multi-agent workflows • Anthropic releases Claude Opus 5 • Google launches Gemini 3.6 Flash • GitHub adds controls for AI agents • Microsoft releases its Agent Framework Harness • Cursor introduces automatic model routing • JetBrains improves context for coding agents Read the newsletter: https://open.substack.com/pub/proflead/p/a…
Which GPT-5.6 Sol reasoning level is best for coding? I gave Medium, High, Max, and Ultra exactly the same task: build a complete React and TypeScript to-do application. I compared: • The final applications • Build time • Context usage • Tests and verification • Code quality • Accessibility Finally, I asked GPT-5.6 Sol to review all four codebases and choose the winner. Does more reasoning always mean better cod…
My setup at work 🧑💻
My first community meetup in Chiang Mai, and I'm happy that it was part of OpenAI Build Week! We learn about the latest OpenAI updates, Codex, Sites, Ultra Mode, and the new developer workflow: /plan → /goal A→ build → test → review → deploy We also had a building challenge. The group completed 11 projects, with some deployed through Sites. Some people even built their projects on their phones! hank you to everyo…
AI News for Developers #27 is out! This week’s issue covers the AI updates developers should actually care about: - Claude Fable 5 returns after its temporary restriction - Cloudflare launches new AI traffic controls for websites - Meta releases Brain2Qwerty v2, a brain-to-text AI research project - Google shares new AI tools for local and multimodal development - Apple previews the next generation of Apple Intelli…
Hey everyone! I just created a video about Codex subagents that explains everything from scratch. If you want to know how to set up custom agents and run them in parallel, please watch it here: https://youtu.be/xItvCoWNPVo?si=xW6Af1ZaDP1wKxEo
I had the opportunity to volunteer at the DataKind AI Builder Lab in Bangkok, helping build AI solutions with disaster management professionals. As a thank you to all volunteers, OpenAI gave us a gift. 🎁 Here’s a quick unboxing! #OpenAI #DataKind #AI #Bangkok #Volunteer #Unboxing #DisasterManagement
Hey devs! 😀🙏 Run Gemma 4 12B locally with Ollama in this step-by-step tutorial. I’ll show you how to install Ollama, download the model, test prompts, and use Gemma 4 12B as a private local AI assistant on your own computer. Watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/fppaj5s4CeM?si=kYLjO7bjtw74bUOU
Why do local AI agent scripts fail in production? Because they lack a dedicated runtime. If a background worker dies mid-execution, your agent's state is wiped out. In this video, I show you how to use Google ADK alongside AgentSpan (an open-source durable runtime) to make your agents crash-proof. I literally kill the Python process mid-run and reconnect to the exact same execution step using a Run ID. If you're b…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @profleaddev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you want to see AI News for devs in this channel?
- No0%
- Up to you0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“proflead — AI News & Tools for Devs” (@profleaddev), 68 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profleaddev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.