Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Карьера на Кушетке 🛏

Channel

Карьера на Кушетке 🛏

@profinakushetke

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003723401691
TypeChannel
Username@profinakushetke
Created28 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/profinakushetke

Growth

4042417 August 2026 — 40 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41 subscribers22 August 2026 — 42 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 11:0542+1
14 Aug 2026, 20:2841+1
10 Aug 2026, 19:3140no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:3240first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.7%
avg views ÷ 42 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
25.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held12 (28 January 202610 August 2026)
Views total28
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4241.6%
2221.8%
👍2120.8%
💯43.96%
❤‍🔥32.97%
🏆21.98%
🤓21.98%
🤩21.98%
🤔10.99%
🤝10.99%
🤡10.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC28 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

​​ШРИФТ ИДЕАЛЬНЫЙ, А БИЗНЕС В ЗАДНИЦЕ👨‍🏭👷‍♀️🛠 2 часа ночи. Ты — топ-менеджер с приличным доходом (или вообще собственник бизнеса), сидишь с красными глазами и лично... выравниваешь идиотские иконки в презентации. 🤦‍♂️ Потому что «эти безрукие дебилы опять всё запорят, мне проще самому сделать за пять минут». Узнал? Поздравляю. Ты не гений контроля и не «отец родной» для компании. Ты — самый дорогой, уставший и неэфф

7

18 Feb 2026, 08:09 UTC317 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

​​ВЫГОРАНИЕ ИЛИ РЕЖИМ ТЕРПИЛЫ?! 🤡 ​Давайте уберем красивый термин «ВЫГОРАНИЕ» подальше. 🗑 Он слишком благороден для того, что происходит с вами на самом деле. ​Часто ко мне приходят, и с порога я уже слышу: «У меня нет ресурса, я выгорел». ⛔️ Вы не сгорели. Вы просто годами тренируете навык проглатывать... ​🏝 Почему отпуск уже не поможет? ​Классический совет: «Тебе надо отдохнуть! Слетай на Мальдивы!». ✈️ Вы лети

🔥73👍2🤔1

10 Feb 2026, 13:48 UTC239 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Вести с полей😜 Друзья! Только что провел интенсив - блок по профориентации курса Карьерной Экспертизы в мини-группе Центра Профессий Будущего⚙ Делюсь эмоциями🔥

🔥8🏆2👍21

5 Feb 2026, 19:00 UTC249 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

​​🧎Как понять, что работодатель хочет вас нагнуть ещё до оффера🧎‍♀️ Готовясь к собеседованию, ты, наверное, снова думаешь, какой галстук👔 надеть или какую формулировку для самопрезентации подобрать, чтобы выглядеть убедительнее. Всё это важно, но твоя задача — не только понравиться, а ещё и просканировать работодателя на наличие дерьмеца💩. Компании часто показывают свою истинную суть ещё на этапе найма. Нужно тольк

🔥5👍3❤‍🔥21

3 Feb 2026, 12:58 UTC176 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

​​Поиск своего предназначения — это благородная цель или оправдание твоего невроза? 🤔 За 5 лет в профориентации я видел тысячи людей, которые годами находятся в «поиске себя». И вот что интересно: часто это не про самореализацию, а про глубокий внутренний конфликт. 👊🔨 Можно работать не впахивая на 210%, строить карьеру и при этом быть глубоко несчастным, потому что ты чувствуешь — «я не на своем месте». Но парадокс

2👍2🔥2🤓2💯1🤩1

31 Jan 2026, 23:11 UTC154 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

​​​🍭 Почему ты сливаешь свой потенциал в унитаз за 15 секунд ​Давай честно: ты не «выгорел», ты просто обнищал. Морально и биологически. Просыпаешься, и вместо того, чтобы планировать будущий день или хотя бы сообразить, как поднять свой зад с кровати, ты открываешь телефон. 📱 Поздравляю, ты только что продал свой самый ценный ресурс — утренний фокус — за порцию «бесплатного» контента. Ты — дешевый дофаминовый нарк

🔥10💯3

30 Jan 2026, 13:16 UTC114 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🤦‍♂🤡Синдром Самозванца: это не скромность, это ваша мания величия Вчера мы причесали резюме. Теперь вы выглядите дорого💎 Но в реальности, когда нужно открыть рот на совете директоров, заявить о себе в новом громком проекте или просто назвать адекватный ценник за свои услуги, вы сдуваетесь. Включается он. ➡️ Внутренний Самозванец. 🗣 «Куда ты лезешь? Там же реально серьёзные люди, а ты просто хорошо притворяешься».

👍65

29 Jan 2026, 14:35 UTC125 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🗑 Почему ваше «идеальное» резюме летит в мусорку за 6 секунд Больно? 😢Да. Обидно? Еще бы. Вы писали его три ночи, вспоминали все свои подвиги начиная со школьной скамьи, а рекрутер потратил на него ровно 6 секунд. Это не метафора, это данные айтрекинга (исследования движения глаз). Если за 6 секунд глаз незацепился за суть — вы в корзине. Я - карьерный продюсер🤓, и я вижу, как крутые Топы и эксперты сами закапывают

👍5🔥4🤡1🤩1

28 Jan 2026, 16:25 UTC118 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

​👋 Привет. Меня зовут Святослав Семеренко, и я здесь, чтобы взломать ваши ограничения и показать, на что вы реально способны. ​Добро пожаловать на канал «Карьера на кушетке 🛋️». ​Обычно эксперты предлагают что-то одно: или сухие карьерные схемы, или долгую терапию души. Я выбрал другой путь. ​⚡️ Моя философия — жизнь на высоких оборотах. Но вы не вывезете этот ритм, если сами ставите себе палки в колеса, а ваш зар

🔥53❤‍🔥1👍1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @profinakushetke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 740,803 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Карьера на Кушетке 🛏” (@profinakushetke), 42 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profinakushetke.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.