Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Коллаген Proficoll®

@proficoll

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001615098491
TypeChannel
Username@proficoll
DescriptionЗаказать👇 https://proficoll.com/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=main-link 🧬 Телеграм @Collagen_Proficoll 🐟 Коллаген из дикого толстолобика 💧 Собственное производство 🔬 Научно исследован
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/proficoll

Growth

222223222.57 Aug 2026, 13:05 — 222 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:41 — 223 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:31 — 223 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:058 Aug 2026, 10:31
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 222–223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:31223no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:41223+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:05222first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 27 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 223 subscribers
Avg views / post
58.0
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held11 (27 February 20268 August 2026)
Views total232
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
93
Videos
27
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4331.9%
👍3425.2%
2720.0%
👏139.63%
🍓53.70%
🥰42.96%
💘32.22%
21.48%
😍21.48%
🐳10.741%
💯10.741%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC12 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Нужен ли витамин C в составе коллагена? Короткий ответ: нет. Отсутствие витамина C в составе продукта не делает пищевой коллаген неусвояемым. В бытовом представлении часто смешивают два разных процесса: всасывание пищевого коллагена и синтез собственного коллагена в организме. После приема внутрь коллаген, как и другие пищевые белки, расщепляется пищеварительными ферментами до аминокислот и небольших пептидов. Ви

👍41🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC57 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧬 Разработки Proficoll представлены на конференции «БиоАгро 2026» Основатель Proficoll, кандидат медицинских наук Иван Котов выступил на отраслевой конференции «БиоАгро 2026», организованной Россельхозбанком. В центре доклада были научные и технологические разработки компании в области рыбного коллагена. Иван Котов представил натуральный коллаген Proficoll, производимый из кожи дикой речной рыбы, а также результаты

🔥5👏42

23 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC84 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коллаген Proficoll выходит на рынки Азии https://t.me/npriorities/1313 На закрытой экспертной сессии «Биоэкономика – новый источник развития регионов» Иван Котов представил продукцию Proficoll и рассказал о развитии нашего ключевого направления: высокомолекулярного рыбного коллагена. Сегодня коллаген становится стратегически важным продуктом. Спрос на него растёт не только в России, но и на мировых рынках, особенн

7👍4🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC79 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А вы знали, что 3D-биопринтеры печатают ткани и органоподобные конструкции специальными биочернилами? Так вот, высокоочищенный рыбный коллаген Proficoll уже используется в таких чернилах. https://t.me/mcxae/10236

🔥72😍2🐳1

21 Jun 2026, 11:37 UTC130 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Proficoll на международных площадках Коллаген Proficoll был представлен на ПМЭФ и на форуме Россия - АСЕАН в Казани. На деловых встречах продукт заинтересовал потенциальных партнёров из стран Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона и Ближнего Востока. Особое внимание вызвала сама идея Proficoll: разработка натурального нативного рыбного коллагена без использования консервантов. Также были высоко оценены результаты наших

👍71

16 May 2026, 19:31 UTC145 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Казанский экономический форум стал для команды Proficoll важной площадкой для профессионального диалога и новых партнёрств. На панельной сессии Иван Котов представил проект перед представителями федеральных органов власти, отраслевых институтов и крупнейших игроков пищевой промышленности: заместителем Министра сельского хозяйства РФ, руководителем Агроэкспорта, заместителем Главного государственного санитарного врач

👍75🔥3

26 Apr 2026, 08:23 UTC160 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Суставам нужен не просто белок. Им нужен коллагеновый белок. Хрящ не имеет собственных сосудов. Он получает питание во время движения, когда сустав поочередно сжимается и разжимается. Проще говоря, во время ходьбы хрящ работает как губка: при нагрузке отдает жидкость, при разгрузке снова впитывает ее вместе с растворенными веществами. Но одного движения мало. Суставу нужен материал для обновления. И здесь важен не

🔥7👍43💯1

10 Mar 2026, 15:04 UTC218 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🦴 Не только для кожи: почему о рыбном коллагене всё чаще говорят в контексте суставов Коллаген давно закрепился в сознании как “что-то для кожи”. Но за последние годы у науки появился ещё один важный фокус: суставы. Исследования показывают, что рыбный коллаген может быть полезен как поддерживающий компонент при боли в колене, дискомфорте при движении и возрастных изменениях суставов. (PubMed) Что уже известно: 1. М

👍8👏3🔥31

9 Mar 2026, 08:19 UTC187 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧬 Наука против выпадения: что нашел PubMed о рыбном коллагене? 🤔 Мы привыкли, что коллаген — это про кожу лица. Но исследования последних двух лет взрывают инфополе. Оказывается, главный удар по проблемам волос (от выпадения до истончения) наносит... рыбный коллаген. И это не маркетинг, а данные из авторитетных баз PubMed и РИНЦ. 📌 Исследование №1: Контроль над "спячкой" фолликулов В 2024 году журнал Journal of Fu

5🔥5👏3🥰2

27 Feb 2026, 08:29 UTC180 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Коллаген Proficoll можно использовать как добавку вместе со спортивным питанием и "зелеными" коктейлями https://t.me/krylova_evgenia/4169

🍓5💘32

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @proficoll. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 648,369 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Коллаген Proficoll®” (@proficoll), 223 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proficoll.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.