Пишем для врачей-дерматологов. Новости доказательной медицины, клинические случаи, исследования, клин.рекомендации.
По всем вопросам: @profvrach
Заявление в РКН 7693638711
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,109–15,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 01:56
15,137
+8
13 Aug 2026, 15:58
15,129
+4
12 Aug 2026, 12:04
15,125
+1
11 Aug 2026, 09:07
15,124
+2
10 Aug 2026, 06:31
15,122
+5
9 Aug 2026, 09:12
15,117
+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:11
15,116
-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:57
15,119
+6
6 Aug 2026, 18:18
15,113
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
23.5%
avg views ÷ 15,137 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,560
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.876%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
37 (29 July 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
131,740
Reactions total
1,154
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈148
Links
≈2,410
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 52s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,154 reactions across 37 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
296
25.6%
💯
226
19.6%
👏
207
17.9%
👍
192
16.6%
🔥
172
14.9%
❤
50
4.33%
😁
6
0.52%
🥰
2
0.173%
👎
1
0.087%
😢
1
0.087%
🤔
1
0.087%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Математическая модель объяснила, почему непрерывная терапия меланомы часто выигрывает у прерывистых схем
Опубликованы результаты команды Техасского университета в Арлингтоне совместно с Н. Комаровой и Э. Саморой: исследователи объединили математическое моделирование и методы оптимального управления, чтобы сравнить схемы таргетной терапии при меланоме. В то время как лабораторные эксперименты поддерживали прерывистое…
Разбор КР. Диагностика кожной красной волчанки: зачем нужны анализы, если диагноз клинический ❓
*️⃣В КР указано, что диагноз кожных форм красной волчанки устанавливается врачом-дерматовенерологом на основании клинической картины.
*️⃣При этом лабораторное обследование проводится для исключения системной красной волчанки, оценки активности патологического процесса и контроля безопасности системной терапии.
*️⃣Всем п…
Патчи при экземе: не крем, а локальная защита очага
🇺🇸В США появился бренд Mind the Skin, который делает патчи для кожи, склонной к экземе. Пациентам с хроническими воспалительными дерматозами часто нужен не только крем “на всю зону”, а локальное средство для небольшого зудящего участка, который постоянно травмируется одеждой, трением или расчесыванием.
У бренда ❤️ типа патчей под разные этапы обострения: ранние пр…
👄Филлер и ишемия десны: когда сосудистое осложнение видно не только на коже
После инъекций филлеров гиалуроновой кислоты сосудистая окклюзия остается одним из самых серьезных осложнений: риск связан не только с некрозом кожи, но и с поражением анатомически связанных зон. В кейсе 2026 года описана окклюзия подглазничной артерии с вторичной ишемией десны после введения филлера.
Авторы использовали ультразвуковую нави…
Разбор КР. Подострая кожная красная волчанка: когда высыпания похожи на псориаз
Подострая кожная красная волчанка занимает промежуточное положение между острой и хронической кожной формой. В КР описаны две основные клинические картины: папуло-сквамозная, или псориазиформная, и кольцевидная.
При псориазиформной форме появляются гиперемические папулы и небольшие бляшки, чаще в области плеч, верхней части груди и спин…
🇬🇧Великобритания закрывает программу для иностранных врачей — медицинские колледжи протестуют
NHS England прекращает Medical Training Initiative — программу, по которой врачи из других стран могли до двух лет работать и обучаться в британских больницах, а затем возвращаться домой с новым клиническим опытом.
Ежегодно через программу в NHS приезжали около 400–500 врачей, в том числе из Пакистана, Шри-Ланки и Непала. …
86% пациентов с хроническими дерматозами имеют психическую нагрузку — данные обследования
Одноцентровое поперечное эпидемиологическое исследование в Клинике им. В.А. Рахманова (Первый МГМУ), март 2025–март 2026, n=500; верификация по МКБ‑10, оценка — валидированные шкалы и консультация психиатра.
Психиатрические диагнозы подтверждены у 46,4% (n=232); 61,2% из них — расстройства адаптации (F43). Субсиндромальный пси…
☀️Конфокальная микроскопия: можно ли увидеть UV-повреждение кожи до появления опухоли
Ультрафиолетовое излучение связано не только с видимыми очагами поражения, но и с так называемым полем повреждения кожи: участком хронически облученной кожи, где уже происходят ранние клеточные изменения, хотя клинически опухоль еще не сформировалась.
Проблема в том, что оценка такого раннего UV-индуцированного повреждения остается…
Разбор КР. Что провоцирует кожные формы красной волчанки
*️⃣В КР среди важных звеньев патогенеза дискоидной красной волчанки указаны ультрафиолетовое излучение, образование аутоантител, развитие аутоиммунных реакций, нарушение регуляции функций Т-лимфоцитов и дендритных клеток.
*️⃣Факторы риска для дискоидной формы — длительное пребывание на солнце, морозе и ветре, I фототип кожи, лекарственная непереносимость и оч…
Мария Гладких сообщила о диагнозе меланома
Бывшая ведущая «Россия‑24» Мария Гладких в Instagram объявила, что у неё выявлена меланома кожи. По её словам, при очередном осмотре дерматолог удалил одну подозрительную родинку и направил материал на биопсию — исследование показало злокачественное новообразование; сейчас врачи определяют стадию и будут планировать лечение.
Гладких (35 лет) призвала подписчиков не пренебр…
Разбор КР. Кожная красная волчанка: почему это не всегда “только кожа”
Красная волчанка в КР определяется как мультифакториальное аутоиммунное воспалительное заболевание соединительной ткани с поражением разных органов и систем.
Но в дерматологической практике часто речь идет именно о кожных формах: дискоидной, подострой, хронической, острой, буллезной, неонатальной и других вариантах.
Важный акцент рекомендаций — …
🕺42 часа на клинику и еще 4 — на учебу: как в Швейцарии меняют неделю ординаторов
Швейцарская больница Spital Affoltern с 1 сентября переводит врачей-ассистентов на модель рабочей недели «42+4». Она предусматривает 42 часа клинической работы и еще четыре часа защищенного времени для структурированного обучения.
😡Раньше расчетная продолжительность недели для молодых врачей составляла 50 часов. Новая модель должна ум…
🙏22
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @profdermatologists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какое предраковое поражение в КР названо самым частым процессом, приводящим к кожному рогу?
Себорейный кератоз11%
Актинический кератоз66%
Контагиозный моллюск4%
Ангиокератома18%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 521,116 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Профессия – дерматолог” (@profdermatologists), 15,137 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profdermatologists.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
