Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Production Stuff | Заметки продюсера

@productionstuff

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,226subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719306086
TypeChannel
Username@productionstuff
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/productionstuff

Growth

2,2262,2292,227.57 August 2026 — 2,229 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,229 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,226 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,226–2,229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 03:262,226-3
8 Aug 2026, 09:182,229no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:312,229first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 22 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

347 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 520392148123440518117751.0%
custom 52175657376353021707722.2%
🔥5616.1%
👏3610.4%
🌚10.288%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 347reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 22 December 2024 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 10 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @productionstuff. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 December 2024 to 16 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Dec 2025, 12:08 UTC≈2,460 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❗️Патент на услуги в области фотографии или как экономить на налогах Если вы фотограф и у вас ИП (и зарабатываете меньше 20 млн. в год) - очень рекомендую дочитать. Сегодня 16 декабря - последний день, чтобы оформить патент с 1 января 2026 г. по ОКВЭД 74.20 - деятельность в области фотографии. Если вы работаете как ИП на УСН, то платите часто раза в 1,5-2-3 больше налогов. На патенте налог фиксированный и покупает

custom 520392148123440518115🔥1

13 Nov 2025, 16:00 UTC≈2,590 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📎Где учиться продюсированию в fashion и фото: честный гид 2025-2026 Давно собиралась сделать апдейт своих постов про образование для продюсеров (и годовые программы, и курсы). Но т.к. под конец года годовые программы отходят на второй план - поэтому начинаем с коротких курсов: как на продюсера (если вы только входите в профессию), так и для практикующих продюсеров, которые хотят углубиться в фото/fashion и усилить с

🔥20custom 52039214812344051818

10 Oct 2025, 14:41 UTC≈2,930 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚫️Карта продакшн-рынка 2025: куда двигаться, с кем работать и что нас ждёт Выхожу из диджитал-детокса сразу с двумя важными апдейтами, которые вы могли пропустить: 1️⃣ Вход в чат «Точно продюсер» снова открыт и бесплатный → @tochnop + появились тематические ветки с модераторами по направлениям 2️⃣ Основатель чата, Денис Шашкин @ifirby, выпустил первое большое исследование продакшн-рынка в России. 2,5 месяца ресер

🔥35👏6custom 52039214812344051816

8 May 2025, 10:13 UTC≈3,970 views70 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026

⚫️Что такое «продакшн-карма» — и почему это работает даже у скептиков (типа меня) Знаю, звучит странно и немного «по-магически», но среди продюсеров термин «продакшн-карма» вполне рабочий и даже распространённый. Допустим: ▶️Натурная съёмка, по прогнозу - ливень, а смену не перенести (Hyundai мы снимали именно так) ▶️Смена на заводе, а визажист забыла паспорт (и её просто не впустили) ▶️Локация слетела за два дня

custom 520392148123440518155👏14🌚1

23 Apr 2025, 18:17 UTC≈2,610 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚫️Бесплатная онлайн-лекция «Три главные ошибки при планировании бюджета fashion-съемки» Завтра (24 апреля в 19:00) в рамках старта продаж 3го потока курса "Продюсер fashion-съемок" буду рассказывать: 📎 как избежать бюджетных провалов 📎 где искать «дырки» в финансовом плане 📎 как оптимизировать затраты без потери качества 📎 реальные кейсы и примеры из практики Зарегистрироваться здесь PS в подарок за регистрацию в

custom 520392148123440518110👏4

10 Apr 2025, 08:11 UTC≈2,710 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🎥 Новое интервью на канале — и это не просто разговор, а настоящая инструкция, как с нуля вырастить продакшен в фэшн-индустрии за 2 года. Гость выпуска — Анска Кутлу (ex-Head of Production VProject, ex-producer Harper’s Bazaar, InStyle, Icons, преподаватель BHSAD и VProject Education, подкастер) У неё за плечами 20 лет опыта в моде, рекламе и издательствах. Она построила внутренний продакшн в крупном модельном аген

custom 520392148123440518123👏5

19 Mar 2025, 09:01 UTC≈3,240 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📎 Как считать права на использование фото и видео? Тема острая, так что сразу предупреждаю — пост кликбейтный. Кто в индустрии получает оплату за права, а кто отчуждает их по умолчанию? В фото за расширение использования доплачивают моделям и фотографам. В видео режиссёры, операторы и художники-постановщики отчуждают права — доплату получают только актёры, дикторы и композиторы (хотя и по ним у нас тут были споры)

custom 520392148123440518142👏5

27 Feb 2025, 07:38 UTC≈2,380 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

📎Что важно клиенту при выборе продакшена? И снова я приберегла анонс нового выпуска для вас. Столько инсайтов об изменениях в продакшене, сколько я получила за часовой разговор с Маргаритой, у меня не было никогда! Обсуждаем рекламную индустрию с клиентской стороны — с маркетологом и бренд-менеджером Маргаритой Каврижной (ex: Спортмастер, MAC Cosmetics, Яндекс, Связной). О чём говорим: ➡️ Как небольшому продакше

custom 520392148123440518118👏1

9 Feb 2025, 08:56 UTC≈2,150 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📎Фотограф в Париже: как устроен фэшн-бизнес изнутри? Какие бюджеты, какие клиенты, и почему личные проекты важнее рекламы? Я давно ничего не писала — и, честно, это не просто так. Мне кажется, что я ждала особенного повода для первого поста в 2025 году. И вот он — запуск моего подкаста Production Talks ❤️‍🔥 Итак! Первый гость — Адам Амури, фэшн-фотограф из Парижа. Мы обсудили: ▶️Как устроен фэшн-бизнес во Франци

custom 521756573763530217038

22 Dec 2024, 09:23 UTC≈3,210 views40 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

✨Итоги 2024 Мне очень понравилось, как мои коллеги написали итоги года в своих пабликах, и я поняла, что тоже хочу оставить заметку. Для меня этот год стал временем роста, трансформации и первых шагов в новых направлениях. - я провела прямые эфиры (раз, два), записала первый эпизод подкаста на английском с фотографом из Парижа (сейчас в монтаже), и стала гостьей другого подкаста (ссылка) - провела своё первое офф

custom 521756573763530217039👏1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @productionstuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,071,895 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Production Stuff | Заметки продюсера” (@productionstuff), 2,226 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/productionstuff.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.