Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

M5 | Кинопродакшн

@productionm5

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

151subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002778925214
TypeChannel
Username@productionm5
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/productionm5

Growth

1471511496 August 2026 — 147 subscribers6 August 2026 — 148 subscribers8 August 2026 — 148 subscribers12 August 2026 — 151 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:26151+3
8 Aug 2026, 20:17148no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:30148+1
6 Aug 2026, 02:07147first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 151 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.3
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held7 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total478
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1542.9%
720.0%
custom 5402158166387502234617.1%
🎉411.4%
custom 540223828900240657938.57%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📢 Нам доступны новые персонажи в сериале «Подслушано в Выборге» На фестивале «Окно в Европу» раскрыли главные лица нового сезона: Любовь Аксёнова и Адам Нехай присоединились к касту проекта. ➡️ Адам сыграет Виталика — простого почтальона из Выборга, который случайно становится свидетелем преступления и оказывается втянут в опасную авантюру. ➡️ Любовь — профессиональную киллершу Вику, приехавшую в город всего на од

🎉1custom 54022382890024065791

6 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC50 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📽️ Мы завершили съемки сериала «Клятва Гиппократа» 📽️📽️ В центре сюжета — талантливый и самоуверенный хирург Виктор Живых, который после нарушения протокола оказывается на скорой и учится справляться не только с пациентами, но и с реальной жизнью. Пока Виктор Живых колесил по вызовам, наша съёмочная группа колесила вместе с ним: за время проекта мы успели объехать Москву и Подмосковье, побывать в реальных клиниках,

🔥3🎉1custom 54022382890024065791

6 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC55 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🚨 Экстренная сводка: «Малой» выходит в эфир! 📽️📽️ По сюжету выпускник академии МВД Саша (Тимофей Кочнев) отправляется служить в один из самых неблагополучных районов Югодонска, где неожиданно встречает своего отца — опытного оперативника Малого (Владимир Яглыч). Теперь им предстоит работать бок о бок, вот только представления о законе и правилах службы у новоиспечённых напарников оказываются совершенно разными. В р

🎉2custom 54021581663875022341

5 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

➡️ Полароидный дроп от Никиты Андриенко с площадки «Клятва Гиппократа» «Скоро и эта история закончится, а мы сядем в монтажку создавать для вас медицинский комедийный хит. Такие планы, так верю» — поделился Никита в своих социальных сетях. мы 📲 ВКонтакте

2🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☄️ Смотреть наверх можно: стартовали съемки комедийной мелодрамы «На нас летит метеорит» 📽️📽️ История разворачивается вокруг заместителя мэра Каратовска Вадима Артюхова, который в ожидании возможного конца света, пытается спасти окружающих и наконец понять, чего хочет сам. 📺📺 Сергей Лавыгин, Алена Долголенко, Марина Александрова, Александр Самойленко, Ян Цапник, Игорь Царегородцев, Дмитрий Лысенков, Полина Денисова

4custom 54021581663875022343

30 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC115 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📽️ Завершились съемки сериала «Нефть» Всего планируется 8 серий, в которых зрители увидят, как случайная находка превращает жизнь обычного провинциального инженера Семена Плахова в череду рискованных решений, опасных сделок и непростых моральных выборов. 🎙️ Иван Охлобыстин, актер: «Нефть» — это проект о том, как рушатся привычные ориентиры, когда человек остается один на один с отчаянием. О том, как далеко мы готов

🔥21custom 54022382890024065791

29 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC98 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Люди в чёрном? 😎 Нет, это бэкстейдж со съемок сериала «Челябинский Раджа» мы 📲ВКонтакте

🔥8custom 54021581663875022342

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @productionm5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 332,021 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“M5 | Кинопродакшн” (@productionm5), 151 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/productionm5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.