Channel
@procryptoann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
655subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001496505974 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @procryptoann |
| Created | Between 1 June 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/procryptoann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:25 | 655 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 658 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 658 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
54 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 8 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 14.8% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 11.1% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 9.26% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 September 2025 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Why Nobody is Talking About Your Web3 Project (And How It’s Killing Your Runway) Most crypto projects fail not because of bad technology, but because they are invisible where the actual market attention lives. You can spend hundreds of thousands on audits, liquidity, and product development, but if your comment sections look like a ghost town, investor and user confidence drops to zero. A dead-looking community des…
🤩1
SpaceX is going public in June. Valuation: $350B+. Jim Cramer is already warning about speculative excess. Sound familiar? A SpaceX IPO and a mid-tier crypto TGE run on the same psychological playbook: - Scarcity narrative - Founder with cult status - FOMO-driven demand with no connection to fundamentals - Retail buying at the top while institutions are already in The difference is SpaceX has 30 years of rockets,…
😍1
This isn’t “crypto marketing services” anymore. This is not even traditional Web3 marketing or community management. What we built with ProCrypto MLIS is a crypto growth hacking system designed for one thing: predictable visibility inside algorithm-driven platforms like X (Twitter). Most teams still rely on outdated crypto marketing strategies — posting content, running ads, hoping for engagement, hiring influencer…
🏆6👏5🤔4❤3🥰1
While some are scrolling threads - we’re in the room. 📍Crypto Talks Warsaw. This is where they decide who gets squeezed by regulations and who takes the market. We’re here for the answers.
⚡5🔥5👍1
The KOL morgue is officially full. 🕯️💸 Let’s be real for a minute—the "Key Opinion Leader" model is currently on life support, and I’m about to pull the plug. We’ve spent years throwing mountains of cash at people with "reach" who couldn’t sell a glass of water in a desert because their audience knows—they just know—it’s all a paid performance. It’s theater. Bad theater. The new "meta" isn't about paying for a shou…
🎉3👍1🙏1
Beyond Buzzwords: Why "AI-Driven Insights" Aren't Just Vanity Metrics. 📊🤯 Let's cut through the usual marketing fluff for a sec, okay? Everyone’s screaming about "community," but seriously, are you actually listening, or just measuring likes? The truly smart ones—the ones who are killing it—aren't just tracking engagement. They're using AI to chew through the raw chatter of forums, Reddit threads, and comment secti…
😍2
What's the state of your Marketing budget in 2024, 2025 and tentative planned budget of 2026? YoY Growing OR steady OR declining?
⚡3
The Sneaky Geo-Shill: How to Ghostwrite Your Way into ChatGPT's Brain. 🧠🗺 Okay, guys, let’s talk about something ridiculously meta: AI Shilling. No, I’m not talking about crypto junkies, but something much more subtle, much weirder. Imagine this: you blend targeted, geo-specific data—maybe a truckload of local press releases or niche industry reports—and pump it into the internet’s deep veins. Why? To make sure that…
👏1😁1
There are over 560 million crypto owners worldwide 🤯 🚀 Crypto evolves faster than most industries. Those who adapt win. Those who don’t, fade. Stay ahead of the trends with sharp strategies and smart moves☝️ #CryptoMarketing #TrendsMatter
🔥1
Ether ETFs post consecutive outflows totaling $787.6M. Bitcoin ETFs gain traction. Trends worth monitoring in the crypto space. 📊
❤1
Litecoin's witty Twitter jab at Cowen's comment on price traction is making waves. Incisive humor? Check. Engaged followers? Double check. Keep laughing, #Litecoin!
😁1
Many predict BTC will hit a cycle-high by year-end. However, without solid statistical backing, this may just be misguided optimism. Stay informed!
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @procryptoann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,443,333 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProCrypto Announcements” (@procryptoann), 655 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/procryptoann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.