2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 362–446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 09:37
372
-64
12 Sept 2026, 04:22
436
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
141.1%
avg views ÷ 372 subscribers
Avg views / post
525
1 post measured
Reaction rate
13.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
12 (14 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
525
Reactions total
73
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
834 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🎉
182
21.8%
👍
176
21.1%
🔥
171
20.5%
❤
153
18.3%
👏
95
11.4%
🤩
56
6.71%
🖕
1
0.12%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 834 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 ProCash Club: Official Launch & New Horizons!
Dear community members!
The comprehensive testing and software debugging stage has been successfully completed. All platform modules and smart contracts are operating smoothly and are fully ready for scaling.
We are entering the soft launch phase - testing the system under high load and large transaction volumes.
🍁 Autumn - A Season of Massive Opportunities!
This is…
ProCash Club Marketing Roadmap 🚀
Marketing and growth strategy are the primary drivers for scaling ProCash Club. Our key goal is to build a powerful international community and empower every partner with top-tier tools for building a successful business.
🗺 Key Marketing Strategy Milestones:
🌐 Global Localization - Adapting the platform and multilingual communication channels for seamless user experience worldwide.
…
ProCash Club Technical Roadmap 🛠
We are convinced that the DeFi industry is only at the beginning of its global growth, with major technological breakthroughs yet to come. As part of the ProCash Club Technical Roadmap, we are opening up massive growth prospects for the entire ecosystem.
Our team has already built a robust hybrid model that unifies DeFi investment opportunities and the power of multi-level marketing…
ProCash Club Affiliate Program: Dual Income Stream 🤝
The ProCash Club platform features a powerful dual-vector reward system that combines rapid cycle bonuses with deep yield from your team's DeFi investments.
1️⃣ Cyclical Pool Referral Program (Linear Bonus)
Earn direct commissions whenever partners in your structure purchase cycles, down to 3 levels in depth:
🥇 1st Line: 3% of the cell cost
🥈 2nd Line: 2% of the …
How Much Does an Investor Earn on the Cycles + DeFi Tier? A Breakdown of the Numbers 🚀
Let’s look at the yield generated by combining the cycle engine and the DeFi pool using a $1,100 deposit as an example.
Deposit Distribution:
✅ $100 — Purchase of a position in the cyclical pool (unlocks the boosted limit).
✅ $1,000 — Allocation to the DeFi pool at 4% daily.
Daily Income Distribution (4% per day):
✅ 2% per day — …
How Much Does a FreeDeFi Investor Earn? Numbers Breakdown 💰
Let's break down a real example with a $1,100 deposit to see the minimum guaranteed yield over 150 days with zero mandatory referrals.
Suppose you enter strictly as a passive investor and do not plan to build a network. You place $1,100 into the FreeDeFi liquidity pool at 2% daily.
Daily Yield Split (2% daily):
✅ 1% daily - Transit Balance (fully withdrawa…
Getting Started with ProCash Club: Maximum Yield Guide 🚀
Connecting your Web3 wallet instantly unlocks your personal dashboard - your command center for financial growth.
Choose your pathway:
1. 💡 Basic (DeFi Only): Operating without purchasing cycles, but with a reduced interest rate.
2. 🔥 Maximum (Cycles + DeFi): Activation of a cycle that unlocks higher yield in DeFi pools and expands limits.
Step-by-step algor…
DeFi in ProCash Club: Technologies, Trends, and the Roadmap Ahead 🌐
The Decentralized Finance (DeFi) market is moving at breakneck speed. Our goal is not just to follow trends, but to integrate the most promising Web3 solutions directly into the ProCash Club ecosystem.
Here is how we unlock the power of DeFi today and where we are heading tomorrow:
⚡️ Bulletproof Smart Contracts
Our development team has years of ex…
Who is Behind the Success of ProCash Club? 🌐
Behind the flawless operation of our platform lies a powerful synergy of developers, analysts, and a strong business community. Here is what drives our ecosystem:
💻 IT Department: Our team of 10+ core developers has built a flexible and scalable architecture. We designed this ecosystem to seamlessly integrate new mechanics and continuously elevate the user experience.
📊…
ProCash Club — A synergy of the two most powerful crypto trends 🚀
We have combined the best network marketing tools with advanced DeFi technologies, solving the core issue of crypto projects: network longevity and burn-out.
At the heart of our ecosystem lies a unique liquidity cycle:
🔄 The Cyclical Pool feeds DeFi: The active cycle engine attracts strong network leaders, constantly injecting fresh liquidity into th…
Welcome to ProCash Club! 👋
We have combined two of the most powerful forces: aggressive digital marketing and blockchain technologies ⚙️
Our goal isn't just to create another community, but to build a global ecosystem where leaders and investors from all over the world profit from a fair and transparent wealth distribution system 🌐
You’ve already made the decision to be among the pioneers - and that is the ultimat…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @procashnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProCash News” (@procashnews), 372 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/procashnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.