Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ProcMedia

@proc_media

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

246subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003787286256
TypeChannel
Username@proc_media
DescriptionПо всем вопросам: @rockybalboa_01 Ваш главный гид в сфере High-Risk: - Актуальные новости - Интервью с топами рынка - Эффективные инструменты для работы
Created17 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/proc_media

Growth

2467 Aug 2026, 17:32 — 246 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:34 — 246 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:328 Aug 2026, 09:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 245–247 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:34246no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:32246first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
101.6%
avg views ÷ 246 subscribers
Avg views / post
250
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held14 (17 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,500
Reactions total192
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

216 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51205998716062289597032.4%
4119.0%
🔥4119.0%
3918.1%
custom 545614067402801948673.24%
👍41.85%
😁31.39%
🥰31.39%
🏆20.926%
👀20.926%
👌20.926%
10.463%
🦄10.463%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
310
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 11 we hold a reading for · 91%
Most on one post
60
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @proc_media. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC133 views14 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎁 10 бесплатных проверок за подписку Коллеги, запустили канал, где рассказываем об обновлениях в нашем чекере Подпишитесь на нашу группу - сейчас там проходит розыгрыш, где ты можешь получить бесплатные проверки для Rich PDF Check

5custom 51205998716062289595👀2👌2

5 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC167 views16 reactions24 Starsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ Санкции и их влияние на проверку чеков Коллеги, привет! В последнее время из-за санкций начались блокировки сертификатов российских доменов. В связи с этим не открывалась ссылка на разделение счета в Альфа-Банке для проверки чека. ⚠️ Соответственно, мошенники снова активизировались с поддельными ссылками, из-за чего команды начали терять свои деньги. Будьте предельно внимательны перед завершением сделки! ✅ Мы

custom 51205998716062289596👍4🔥3custom 545614067402801948621

3 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC190 views13 reactions9 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итоги мини-розыгрыша: 50 проверок для 10 победителей! 🎉 Коллеги, привет! 👋 Спасибо всем, кто успел поучаствовать и протестировать Rich PDF Check 🔥 Победители, которые получают +50 проверок на баланс: 1. @gt*tet*er 2. @d*nzel**98 3. @iam*otg*stb* 4. @**hsueirr** 5. @m*sb*t1 6. @faf*ffff*** 7. @r*sh_y* 8. @alh*mdul*llah***37 9. @g*rr**ch 10. @k*nn**ore Проверки поступят к вам на баланс в течение часа 🔜 Напоминаем

🔥4custom 5120599871606228959432

3 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC187 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥53😁32custom 51205998716062289592

1 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC292 views24 reactions41 Starsread 8 August 2026

⚡️ Коллеги, совсем скоро мы запускаем тот самый розыгрыш на 1000$ и баланс проверок Rich PDF Check среди подписчиков ProcMedia! В преддверии анонса хотим по секрету вам рассказать... 🤫 Для участия и повышения шансов на победу нужно начать пользоваться нашими инструментами уже сейчас: ☄️ Rich PDF Check - проверяйте чеки на подлинность ☄️ Rich Doliv - доливайте остатки по реквизитам Чем активнее вы используете продукт

custom 512059987160622895911🔥76

1 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC282 views21 reactions45 Starsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

9custom 54561406740280194865custom 51205998716062289594🥰3

30 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC276 views22 reactions28 Starsread 8 August 2026

Актуальные методы работы в HighRisk: что работает сегодня? 🔥 Коллеги, привет! 👋 Рынок меняется каждый день. То, что работало год назад, сегодня может слить депозит. Мы проанализировали текущие методы и делимся с вами. 1. МОБИЛЬНАЯ КОММЕРЦИЯ 📱 Один из самых востребованных методов на сегодня. Работа ведется в основном по Билайну. Откупа летят на РФ (С2С) и страны СНГ. Метод имеет сильные позиции и стабильный спрос, п

6custom 512059987160622895965🔥5

24 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC392 views24 reactions38 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, приветствуем вас! 👋 Сегодня поговорим про метчинг. Про ту самую боль, когда вы залили реквизит на 80–90%, а остаток висит мертвым грузом. Вроде бы работа сделана, но результат не полный. Никому не надо объяснять, как это бесит. Мы знаем эту проблему не понаслышке. Сами через нее проходили. Именно поэтому разработали собственный инструмент, который помогает доливать остатки. RICH DOLIV — сервис, который по

custom 512059987160622895911🔥76

24 Jul 2026, 09:57 UTC313 views21 reactions29 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 RICH PDF CHECK — проверка PDF нового уровня Представляем Rich PDF Check - интеллектуальную систему, которая анализирует не только внешний вид PDF-документа, но и его внутреннюю структуру, метаданные и множество технических признаков. 📊 За время закрытого тестирования: • 10 000+ проверенных чеков; • PDF чеков на сумму 50🍋+; • 0 ложных пропусков поддельных PDF. ⚡️ Возможности сервиса: • Глубокий анализ PDF; • Tele

custom 5120599871606228959115🔥5

23 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC268 views22 reactions35 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Гарант-сервис Rich Garant: сделки без рисков в сфере HighRisk Приветствуем вас, коллеги! 🤝 Сегодня хотели бы рассказать вам про наш первый инструмент для безопасного проведения сделок 🥳 Мы запустили закрытый гарант-сервис для сделок между покупателем и продавцом. Без нервов и страха, что вас кинут Как это работает: 💰 Покупатель передает средства нам 📦 Продавец выполняет свои обязательства ✅ Мы переводим оплату пос

8custom 512059987160622895973🏆2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @proc_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 182,359 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ProcMedia” (@proc_media), 246 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proc_media.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.