vote nya sampe besok malem, jadi masih bisa dishare ya

Channel
ATTENTION
@problemcnit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
44subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001716982982 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @problemcnit |
| Created | 5 December 2021 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/problemcnit |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 44 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 44 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 5 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 1
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
bantu vote untuk kedepannya
- nonress 500p/kc, ress 445-450p/kc67%
- nonress 500p/kc, ress 445-450p/kc ada mintake 10kc33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
linknya aku revoke 4 menit lagi https://t.me/+FzkFSK_bjaUzODRl
oke ntar aku buat, tapi cuman untuk 30 orang untuk menghindari kerusuhan atau keributan, jadi yang ga berkepentingan dilarang keras untuk join
ternyata masih banyak pro kontra nya ya disini? gimana kalo aku buat gc untuk diskusi permasalahan harga cnit?
- buat78%
- gausah22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
semangat nge ba
pelan pelan aja naiknya, buat buyer tolong ngerti ya kenapa kita up harga, dan bijaklah dalam membeli cnit atau yang lainnya jangan tergiur dengan harga yang under
wih seller" pada kompak dah, belum sehari udah banyak yang naikin harga 445
@problemnokos itu bukan aku yang buat tapi kalian bisa cek, ada benernya juga
https://t.me/forumdiskusiantarbase/281
kalo yang udah nge ba dari lama pasti tau kok harga dulu itu gimana, dulu itu sekitaran 1k, sekarang malah jauh banget turunnya
tolong kalo misalkan ada yang jual under itu ditegor rame" biar sadar dengan cara yang baik, karna kalo gada yang mulai, harganya bakal tetep gini atau bahkan makin turun lagi
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @problemcnit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
bantu vote untuk kedepannya
- nonress 500p/kc, ress 445-450p/kc67%
- nonress 500p/kc, ress 445-450p/kc ada mintake 10kc33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ternyata masih banyak pro kontra nya ya disini? gimana kalo aku buat gc untuk diskusi permasalahan harga cnit?
- buat78%
- gausah22%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 December 2021 to 5 December 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 714,989 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@problemcnit named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ATTENTION” (@problemcnit), 44 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/problemcnit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.