Channel
@problematicconf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
743subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001977284150 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @problematicconf |
| Description | возвращаемся @problematiccf_bot — бот для тейков @zxclyana — владелец |
| Created | 22 May 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/problematicconf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 743 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 743 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
242 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 94 | 38.8% | |
| 👍 | 51 | 21.1% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 10.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 8.68% | |
| 👾 | 12 | 4.96% | |
| 🌭 | 10 | 4.13% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 3.31% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 2.48% | |
| 😨 | 4 | 1.65% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.826% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.413% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.413% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2024 to 26 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У меня страныий фетиш дрочить на то что Эрик харрис (Участник стрелдбы колумбайна) ебет меня или убивает или просто ебет мой труп или меня пока я умераю. Я не понимаю это просто пубертат или я больная на голову? Но меня пиздец пожбуждает темя насилия особо у меня зацыкленость на простеляные бошки- я люблю дрочить на мысыль того что меня застреливают во время интима с Эриком харрисом или Диланом Клиболдом (Стрелки из …
🌭10❤🔥7😭3👾1
как мне он сказал это было все по взаимному согласию. эта девочка та еще шебутная малявка…. дрочит зубной щеткой электрической в ванной и это слышно на пол этажа @problematicconf
😨4👾2🤓2
приветик
💘4❤🔥1👾1🤝1
Я эмобой, перестаньте меня вспоминать, прошу, я икаю уже несколько недель, врачи говорят это смертельно @problematicconf
👍32🔥7💘6🌚3👾2
тупая вумен дело говорит эмобои сука это секс неанон виви @problematicconf
💘16👾1
я хз насколько это проблематично, и вообще виноват ли я, но короче. какое то время я общался с очень ахуенной девочкой, и все дошло до того что она стала моей подругой с привилегиями)) в один день она вновь позвала меня к себе домой. я пришел, дома на первый взгляд никого не было, мы прошли в ее комнату, чуть полежали и началось. она в тот день была какая то нервная и тихая, что вообще не было похоже на нее. тут я на…
👍7💘3
Еще давно мне начала нравится тематика скулшутинга. Я смотрел видео на ютубе посвященные колумбайну и другим терактам подобного типа и каждый раз мой мозг ловил на этом гиперфиксацию. Я лез в интернет узнавать больше о личностях устроивших скулшутинг и понял, что мне нравится когда в стрельбе участвует определенный дуэт. Я не психопат и ничего такого, часто, прослушиваю записи с места событий я испытываю шок, сожален…
💘9❤🔥5👍4
Оливер это кровавая ляля в моих руках, я буду сжимать его до того пока он не потеряет все свои зубы и внутренние органы, а после достану и приложу к себе Неанон Мадока @problematicconf
💘3
я слишком люблю эмобоев. я хочу трахать грустный худеньких мальчиков и лизать их писечку неанон тупая вумен @problematicconf
🔥9💘2💩1
меня чет подзаебалт мои друзья, две сруться постоянно, одна никогда не слушает что я говорю, да и в целом ощущение чт ей похуй на меня, как и все друзья, ощущение ьудто я скоро уйду становится нормисом и общаться со своей жертвой сталкинга 😇😇 палитревич @problematicconf
🔥5💘3👍1
Без шуток меня это возбуждает))) Насколько проблематичный фетиш? Неанон @RTYTb88 @problematicconf
💘3❤🔥2
я оч хочу своего друга аоаоуаьвьаь У НЕГО КОРОЧЕ КУДРЯВЫЕ ВОЛОСЫ, ОН АЗИАТ, ОЧ МИЛЫЙ, ВОСПИТАННЫЙ НООО он живёт в другой стране и мы не увидимся в ближайшие 3 года И ВООБЩЕ В ДРУЖБЕ НЕТ НАМЁКА НА ОТНОШЕНИЯ СОВСЕМ ЧТО ДЕЛАТЬ Я ТОЛТКО О НЕМ И ДУМАЮ неанон вилка 🪭: выйти на улицу потрогать траву @problematicconf
💘7👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @problematicconf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 758,819 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@problematicconf named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🪭 Problematic confessions” (@problematicconf), 743 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/problematicconf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.