Channel
@pro_vision
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001230946371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pro_vision |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pro_vision |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 55 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 56 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 56 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🫡 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2023 to 3 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что касается metaverse. Людям, а точнее разработчикам, нужно не единое пространство, которое на чьих-то там серверах вертится и не унифицированный аватар. Людям нужно что-то типа ядра Linux. Нечто, что обеспечивает взаимодействие между человеком и виртуальной реальностью и что поддерживает произвольные платформы. Например: 1) Собрал из картона, двух линз и телефона первые VR-очки 2) Поставил некое приложение из PlayM…
👾1
по новосибу уже час, как наступил. Приглашаю вас в будущее - тут интересно ;)
Похоже, что публиковать здесь больше смысла уже нет. Не поймите не правильно, но это должно было случиться. Наверное этот канал нужно отправить архив, но для этого я бы его скачал сначала
🫡2
Хотел вообще воскресить изначально диалог на тему метавселенных, т.к меня осенило парой наблюдений. Но в итоге получился целый материал, но тема такая, что вероятно ее можно раскрывать тысячей способов. Но пока что я особо ни с кем не делился, и поэтому не понимаю - может мне все таки показалось? В общем если TL;DR то метавселенная - это скорее культурное явление, которое довольно легко и понятно может быть создан…
Can We Train Massive Neural Networks More Efficiently? Meet ReLoRA: the Game-Changer in AI Training - MarkTechPost https://www.marktechpost.com/2023/12/21/can-we-train-massive-neural-networks-more-efficiently-meet-relora-the-game-changer-in-ai-training/
Chain of Code: Reasoning with a Language Model-Augmented Code Emulator LMs may still produce a valid solution if they not only write code, but also selectively “emulate” the interpreter by generating the expected output and other lines of code that cannot be executed. In this work, the authors propose Chain of Code, a simple extension that improves LM code-driven reasoning. The key idea is to encourage LMs to format…
Entity-Augmented Code Generation LLMs are effective in generating high-quality text and encapsulating a broad spectrum of world knowledge. However, these mod- els are not designed to utilize external information sources. In this paper, the authors use retrieval-augmented LLMs for a new task — code generation using external entities. Existing retrieval-augmented LLMs fail to assign relevance scores between similar en…
Это сайт с работы, если у вас есть стартап и вы хотите консультацию или инвестиции крупной корпорации из рф, или хотите чтобы вас познакомили с ещё кем-то
Надо написать тг бот для переконвертации аудио из всех форматов
cool or fool? круто\не круто?
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
https://intema.ai/the-platform/
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pro_vision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pro\\vision 👁” (@pro_vision), 55 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_vision.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.