Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Продвижение экспертов в ТГ с Олесей Д-Е.

Channel

Продвижение экспертов в ТГ с Олесей Д-Е.

@pro_telezhku

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

197subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002085331691
TypeChannel
Username@pro_telezhku
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pro_telezhku

Growth

197202199.57 August 2026 — 202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 202 subscribers16 August 2026 — 200 subscribers24 August 2026 — 198 subscribers1 September 2026 — 197 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 25 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 196–203 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 18:23197-1
24 Aug 2026, 17:24198-2
16 Aug 2026, 16:28200-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:20202no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:19202first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 31s
Average length
1m 38s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4332.3%
🙏2518.8%
🔥1612.0%
💯107.52%
👍86.02%
😁75.26%
🥰53.76%
😢43.01%
😭43.01%
😱43.01%
👀21.50%
🕊21.50%
😨21.50%
👏10.752%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 18 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Dec 2025, 13:56 UTC304 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, только что со мной произошла ситуация, которая могла закончиться очень плачевно.. Ко мне обратилась девушка за услугами, договорились о созвоне. Потенциальный клиент предложил провести встречу в Zoom и сам прислал ссылку на конференцию. Ссылка выглядела почти как обычная zoom-ссылка. Почти. Я не стала переходить по ней сразу и внимательно посмотрела на домен. И именно это меня и спасло — в адресе была измен

🙏13💯5😱4

15 Dec 2025, 08:08 UTC214 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А из нашего окна зима снежная видна ❄️ А из вашего окошка? Мы в Ялте сейчас. Скидывайте что из окна в ваших городах

4🔥1

12 Dec 2025, 20:35 UTC198 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забавная функция в тг Скачиваем песню любым удобным способом, например через бота @Buddy_musicbot Жмем поделиться и.. ставим себе в «статус» профиля 😁 В комментах добавлю скрин для наглядности

4👀2

3 Dec 2025, 16:12 UTC192 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Атмосфера с которой записывала 🥹 Очень красиво и непривычно холодно

7🔥5🥰3

3 Dec 2025, 16:09 UTC157 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Дорогие, записала подкаст, который давно просился наружу. Он о том, как вести канал так, чтобы он становился поддержкой, а не приводил к выгоранию. Рассказала: • какую внутреннюю работу принёс нам 2025 год • почему многие чувствовали одиночество, замедление и «пересборку» • что изменится в 2026-м • что сейчас перестало работать в ведении каналов • почему попытка быть «как другие» приводит к выгоранию • что такое жи

🔥51

1 Dec 2025, 08:31 UTC118 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А тут еще и первый день зимы. Ващще трындец 🤣 Еще и я сыплю соль на сахар своими вопросами

😁6💯3🙏3

1 Dec 2025, 08:13 UTC120 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Понедельник день тяжелый?

😢4😭4😨2😁1

1 Dec 2025, 07:30 UTC128 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Доброе утро ☀️ С первым днем зимы) Вернемся к нашей Тележке: Иногда садишься написать пост в канал, а внутри вдруг ступор 🙄 Вроде и опыта дофига. И сказать есть что, куча идей постов было в голове. Но как это уместить в интересный текст? Как быть экспертом, но не душнилой? Какую пользу дать? Кажется, что все всё уже сказали и вам не о чем писать. Да еще и вот это «НАДО» давит — надо написать пост, надо вести регуляр

5🙏4👍2💯2

30 Nov 2025, 20:01 UTC101 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Махарошие, благодарю вас за обратную связь 🫶🏻 ЧЕЛЛЕНДЖУ БЫТЬ Стартуем уже завтра. Присоединяйтесь 👈🏻

🥰21

30 Nov 2025, 15:44 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Будем вместе создавать праздничное настроение?

  1. Хочу, но мне лень 😅0%
  2. Я пока в режиме наблюдателя 👀0%
  3. Я Гринч, но посмотрю, что будет 💚0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pro_telezhku. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Nov 2025, 15:44 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Будем вместе создавать праздничное настроение?

  1. Хочу, но мне лень 😅0%
  2. Я пока в режиме наблюдателя 👀0%
  3. Я Гринч, но посмотрю, что будет 💚0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Nov 2025, 08:21 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Ты на каком уровне со своим каналом?

  1. Всё более-менее ок, хочу следующий уровень13%
  2. Читают, но не покупают13%
  3. Пишу, но меня почти не читают27%
  4. Пишу не регулярно, то много идей, то выгораю33%
  5. Хочу начать, но теряюсь — о чём писать13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 18 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Продвижение экспертов в ТГ с Олесей Д-Е.” (@pro_telezhku), 197 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_telezhku.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.