Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Не оборачивайся

Channel

Не оборачивайся

@pro_strashnoe

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

340subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003882918189
TypeChannel
Username@pro_strashnoe
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 3 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pro_strashnoe

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

337340338.57 August 2026 — 337 subscribers8 August 2026 — 337 subscribers15 August 2026 — 339 subscribers30 August 2026 — 340 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 337–340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 01:18340+1
15 Aug 2026, 00:55339+2
8 Aug 2026, 07:04337no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:23337first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3622.4%
😱2918.0%
😁2817.4%
🔥2515.5%
169.94%
🤣116.83%
💯106.21%
🌚42.48%
🆒21.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC≈1,040 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Увидела тем временем в соцсетях, что вот такой попкорн дают на показах «Колобка». Крипота!

😱14😁10🌚4

6 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC75 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @annasmaslomPhoto

Сходила на Одиссею🎬 Была в компании людей, которые сами снимают кино, поэтому после просмотра отдельное удовольствие получила от обсуждения. Заранее специально ничего не читала о фильме. Знала только, что Елену там играет темнокожая, и что трансгендер тоже есть. Кто из-за этого боится идти на фильм – не бойтесь, Нолан отвёл им совсем мало экранного времени, буквально по 5 минут. Я точно буду смотреть второй раз, по

👍82🔥2🤣1

13 Jul 2026, 17:18 UTC257 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Всё ещё готовлю пост про «Закулисье реальности». Да, про те самые лиминальные пространства!

😁18🤣52

12 Jul 2026, 11:18 UTC244 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Если вы никогда не смотрели ужасы, то начать можно с классики от Кубрика – «Сияния». Книга тоже очень страшная. Я лично слушала в аудиоформате, так как озвучивал прекрасный мужской голос, очень чётко передающий нарастающее безумие главного героя. Правда, случился и момент разочарования: сначала я посмотрела фильм, а уже потом читала книгу. И в ней знаменитой сцены с сёстрами-близнецам не оказалось! Что ж, значит,

👍13🔥5💯4

8 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC293 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Ну правильно, какие ещё рекомендации на Кинопоиске могут быть у автора этого канала💃🏻 (кстати, именно такая музыка у меня в голове играет, когда я это листаю). Рейтинг у картин многообещающий, конечно. БольшУю часть из этих фильмов не смотрела и не буду, потому что там сразу всё ясно) Но корейская «Призрачная станция» давно была в планах, гляну. Нравятся эти азиатские приколы с ломаными движениями и свисающей волос

👍12🤣54

6 Jul 2026, 11:49 UTC251 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подруга присылает кукол из Музея уникальных кукол в Москве, а у меня как раз для вас есть интересный экспонатик…

😱154👍3

3 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC338 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрела нашумевшее «Закулисье реальности». Чуть позже напишу подробный отзыв, а пока скажу, что это действительно новая страница в мире ужасов. Не помню ни одного стоящего фильма по крипипасте (ну ладно, Слендермен ещё куда ни шло), а тут сразу такая годнота. Крипипасты, если что, это старые добрые интернет-страшилки. Обожаю этот жанр, и грущу, что никто по нему ничего толкового не снял! А вот «Закулисье реальнос

🔥18💯64🆒2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @pro_strashnoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Не оборачивайся” (@pro_strashnoe), 340 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_strashnoe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.