4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 318–321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 20:14
318
-1
16 Aug 2026, 03:06
319
-2
8 Aug 2026, 07:31
321
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:31
321
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 318 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (19 June 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
32
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
124 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
40
32.3%
🔥
24
19.4%
💔
16
12.9%
👍
11
8.87%
🤗
10
8.06%
custom 5258328524917321511
7
5.65%
🤯
7
5.65%
💯
6
4.84%
custom 5258044395650821454
2
1.61%
👎
1
0.806%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Лето - время лентяйства, ничего не поделаешь 😁
Канал «Мой психолог» остается пока без внимания (возможно, до сентября). Думаю, что пора отдохнуть друг от друга и от «умного» контента.
Я решила вести другой канал психолог тоже человек ❤️
В нем будет много личного контента. Эх, пока не знаю, что из этого получится 🙈
Подписывайся, ставь реакции, давай советы и делись своим опытом😁
Записала практику, психоаналитическое сообщество не факт, что поддержит. Переживание потери (горя) долгий процесс (и далеко не всем доступный), и эти переживания горя - тоже инвестиция в себя, но я хочу расставить акценты, что переживание переживанию - рознь.
Принятие и выход в благодарность не всегда доступны, когда тебе плохо.
Иногда важно услышать слова другого человека. Вдруг вы услышите в этом сообщении слова, к…
Футбол - это не только игра.
Стоит начаться матчу - и взрослые, в целом разумные люди (хочется в это верить) мгновенно делятся на «наших» и «чужих».
Свои становятся почти безупречными, чужие - раздражающими, а любое спорное решение судьи внезапно превращается в вопрос мировой несправедливости.
В «Недовольстве культурой» Фрейд как раз и пишет о том, что человек не становится «добрым» просто потому, что живет в общес…
Сделала подборку своих психологических разборов кино (название кликабельно, если захотите почитать):
📹Переполненная комната
📹Аллея кошмаров
📹Обыкновенные люди
📹Корсаж
📹Мне бы в небо
📹Горькая луна
📹Стажер
📹 ОКР ОКР
#кинотеатрТриггер #кинопсихология
P.S. Какой ваш любимый фильм/сериал и почему? Поделитесь названием ❤️
P.S.S. Список будет пополняться, возможно разбор вашего любимого будет следующим…
Молчание взрослых - форма участия в насилии.
Редко смотрю сериалы. Долго.
А тут посмотрела.
Под впечатлением.
Напишу о свои мыслях.
«Переполненная комната» - сериал, основанный на реальной истории Билли Миллигана - человека с диссоциативным расстройством идентичности, в сознании которого сосуществовали 24 личности. И именно поэтому этот сюжет не выглядит как просто тяжелая драма о «расколотой психике».
Это история …
С кем из членов семьи ты бы хотел улучшить отношения?
С женой/мужем25%
Детьми25%
Родителями50%
Родственниками50%
Другие50%
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Насколько ты удовлетворен отношениями в своей семье?
10%
225%
325%
425%
525%
Есть над чем подумать, нужна консультация50%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎙️Подкаст
С днем 7️⃣🟥🟥🟥 ❤️
Основная мысль: «выбирайте себя в семье»
❤3💯1🔥1🤗1
Signed Екатерина Михеева
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pro_coach_ME. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
С кем из членов семьи ты бы хотел улучшить отношения?
С женой/мужем25%
Детьми25%
Родителями50%
Родственниками50%
Другие50%
The shares total 200%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Насколько ты удовлетворен отношениями в своей семье?
10%
225%
325%
425%
525%
Есть над чем подумать, нужна консультация50%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мой психолог” (@pro_coach_ME), 318 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_coach_ME.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
