Channel
@prlukina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
660subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001420163414 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prlukina |
| Description | Маша Лукина - бизнес-консультант по внешним коммуникациям Помогаю владельцам B2B-компаний превратить сложный проект в понятную ценность, выстроить репутацию, чтобы рынок понял, зачем им ваш продукт. Запись на консультацию @pr_lukina |
| Created | 22 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prlukina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 660 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 660 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (12 February 2026 – 16 July 2026) |
| Views total | 105 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
290 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 30.0% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 18.3% | |
| custom 5343545593807521643 | 49 | 16.9% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5395597754166682968 | 23 | 7.93% | |
| custom 5458696196749008675 | 17 | 5.86% | |
| 👎 | 11 | 3.79% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.345% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Обратная связь vs поиск косяков А вы замечали, что очень часто обратная связь (ОС) превращается в поиск косяков? Как будто бы ее единственная цель - найти, где плохо и ткнуть в это пальцем. «Слабовато, надо усилить…», «Это все не то, надо переделать…» пусть даже с объяснением как именно усилить и переделать, но на этом все. Формально - обратная связь дана, по факту - нет. Проблема в том, что многие до сих пор путаю…
❤9👍5🔥5
"Боже вас упаси, не читайте до обеда советских газет". Точнее, "новостных" блогов. А лучше никаких не читайте))
🎉3🔥3👎2custom 53955977541666829682
Ох ничессе я отвалилась на два с лишним месяца! Простите, дорогие, столько всего происходит, что писать некогда. Клятвенно обещаю исправиться, как только выдастся свободное время. Обняла! Фоточка, чтоб не забывали, как я выгляжу. @prlukina
❤16👍4🔥4
PR без бюджета: как малому бизнесу заявить о себе и укрепить репутацию Если вы только задумываетесь о PR для своего бизнеса и пока не готовы вкладывать в эту историю солидные бюджеты, то мы с Андреем @zhukov_pr подготовили нашу первую статью для Справочной Точка Банка о том, как продвигать компанию своими силами, даже если бюджет ограничен. Для кого статья и кому она будет полезна? • Владельцам и основателям малог…
🔥8👍5custom 53435455938075216435❤2
Глубоко уважаемая мной Светлана Берегулина и iTrend провели совместное исследование в IT-сегменте на предмет маркетинговых бюджетов и каналов коммуникций. Полностью посмотреть его можно у Светланы в канале, но отдельно хочу отметить, что в текущих условиях (запреты и блокировки в сочетании с ужесточением закона о персданных + развитие ИИ) PR играет уже другими красками. И если вы до сих пор его игнорировали, то имеет…
❤4👍3🔥2
Самое веселое поздравление сегодня - от госуслуг: не забудьте заменить паспорт, а то оштрафуем вас на 5к. Ну, какой к черту паспорт, там качельки освободились!
❤15custom 53435455938075216435custom 54586961967490086753🔥2
Что мне нравится в нашем менталитете, особенно у предпринимателей из числа малых - так это полная, абсолютная, тотальная неубиваемость! Сегодняшний диалог в табачном: - Скоро запрет на вейпы примут, пора начинать возвращаться к сигаретам? - Да не, выкрутимся, способ найдем. Занавес.
🔥10custom 53435455938075216432custom 54586961967490086752
Все хорошо, но надо переделать Есть у нас в коммуникациях особый скилл, который невозможно нормально описать в cv, но именно он чаще всего спасает от проблем. Это какая-то профессиональная чуйка: когда смотришь на готовый к выпуску материал и вроде бы все нормально: цифры есть, формулировки выверены, спикер согласован, тайминг идеальный, но внутри как-то неспокойно. Или вот ТЗ, написанное креативной группой для диз…
❤8👍7🔥7
Официальное заявление по рекламе в Телеге подвезли. ФАС не будет штрафовать до конца текущего года, а с января, видимо, карета превратится в тыкву. @prlukina
🔥3custom 53435455938075216433👎2
Новые мессенджеры в коллекции UPD: WeChat работает отлично, Какао заработал. Сигнал - нет. @prlukina
🔥8👍2custom 53955977541666829681
#Ностальгия Вспомнилась наша креативная кампания для дальневосточного вуза времен первой блокировки тэгэшечки... 10 лет прошло. @prlukina
custom 53435455938075216439custom 53955977541666829687custom 54586961967490086756❤1👍1
У каждого нашего поступка есть последствия - это неоспоримый факт. Но как часто мы отдаем себе отчет в том, какие именно последствия будут у наших поступков? А ведь пиарщики должны задаваться этим вопросом постоянно. Но, к сожалению, не всегда и не все это делают. Вот простой пример: ювелирная сеть Sunlight, пиарщики которой накануне 8 марта выпускают новость о том, что женщины считают подарки стоимостью ниже 30 тыс…
👍13❤10custom 53435455938075216436
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @prlukina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
…а как у вас дела?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,014,442 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Коммуникатор от блога” (@prlukina), 660 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prlukina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.