Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PRIZM Community ENG

Channel

PRIZM Community ENG

@prizmcoin_eng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

947subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001467268557
TypeChannel
Username@prizmcoin_eng
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prizmcoin_eng

Growth

9479499486 August 2026 — 949 subscribers6 August 2026 — 949 subscribers15 August 2026 — 947 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 947–949 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:58947-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:15949no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:04949first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7643.9%
👍5732.9%
2313.3%
🤔126.94%
💯42.31%
👎10.578%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2024 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Jun 2026, 10:14 UTC109 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @pzmspaceVideo

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/prizm-wallet/id1451337725

🔥2

27 Oct 2025, 13:43 UTC719 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔥 Hello, PRIZM Community! If you’re not in the loop yet — now is the time to realize that a new movement is being born! 💎 PRIZM is not just a cryptocurrency — it’s a whole ecosystem that has already grown from a $10 million capitalization to $12 million, and this is only the beginning! 🚀 We’re heading toward our goal — 1$1 per coin, the true price magnet. The path will be visible to everyone, but only those alr

🔥84🤔3

12 Oct 2025, 20:10 UTC589 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @prizmdevVideo

Make PRIZM Great Again?

🔥10💯43

16 Apr 2025, 22:56 UTC≈1,190 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🚨 On May 5th, 2025, PRIZM will release its full source code — total transparency, no secrets. The media’s buzzing — and for good reason. It’s BIG. https://x.com/prizm_coin/status/1912205200191856892

🔥10👍3🤔1

16 Apr 2025, 22:54 UTC981 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/prizm_coin/status/1912640665847996905

👍2🔥2🤔2

14 Apr 2025, 23:27 UTC913 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

PRIZM community — big hello! Urgent news coming very soon — this is IMPORTANT, don’t miss it! Stay sharp. Stay ready. Great things are happening! #PRIZM twitter

👍3🔥3🤔1

8 Mar 2025, 06:57 UTC≈1,020 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🎉✨ Dear women of the PRIZM community! ✨🎉 On this beautiful day, March 8th, we want to congratulate you on the celebration of spring, beauty, and inspiration! 💐🌸 You are our inspirations, support, and driving force that makes our world brighter and more harmonious. May your life be as vibrant as the PRIZM chart during its growth moments! 📈💚 May your dreams come true as easily as PRIZM transactions — fast, secure, an

🔥76

1 Feb 2025, 16:20 UTC≈1,050 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🟢 An OFF resource has been created for technical questions: *Installing PRIZM Core WIN.MAC.LIN *Development of a program for PRISM *API Prism and so on. We invite developers and, of course, anyone who has questions. https://t.me/prizmcoin_tech p.s. Rec. create a PRIZM folder and add all PRIZM chats and channels to it.

👍2🔥2🤔1

29 Jan 2025, 17:05 UTC826 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔼🚀🚀🚀 - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♻️ Buy \ Sell 🚀 Probit | 🏆 ruDEX | ♻️ Golos | 🔝 CMC 💰 Web and full node: 💰 PRIZM SMS | 😊 Online Wallet | 💰 Prizm Core

🔥53👍3

13 Nov 2024, 19:06 UTC≈1,130 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Today, the PRIZM rate touched 🔽 $0.00022 and then returned to 🔼 $0.0005. What happened? ❕ A large holder had over 30 million PZM stolen and dumped on the market. 🔎 How did this happen? A document with full private phrases was stolen. 🔥 Why did the rate recover so quickly? The community worked together to buy back the coin supply.

2👍1🤔1

8 Jul 2024, 18:32 UTC≈2,460 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔔 Final update of Web Versions. 😊 WEB Wallet https://wallet.prizm.vip/ 🟢 Languages ​​added. 🟢 Fix. red zone. 🟢 The information section has been improved. 😊 Web Tool https://tool-prizm.space/ 🟢 Fix. red zone. 🟢 Minor edits. 😊 WEB Core https://core.prizm.vip/ 🟢 Now as a full-fledged node. (for ease of display and browser viewing) Not intended for sending coins, forging, etc. More updates are coming 🔥 #prizm #pzm -

🔥145👍5🤔2

24 Jun 2024, 10:25 UTC≈1,170 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

✅06/17/2024 Wave aesthetics in PRIZM 1️⃣Post from 05/22/2023 https://t.me/prizmcoin_rus_chat/29048 The 5th wave “I won’t tell you”) has been completed)) 2️⃣Post from 02/03/2024 (in a personal closed channel) https://charts.cointrader.pro/snapshot/51RtK "Exciting events await us, gentlemen.... On the weekly Prizm chart, a final diagonal has formed according to Wave Analysis, this is a harbinger of a dramatic price r

👍4🔥3🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prizmcoin_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Mar 2024, 08:01 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

I wonder what the audience is like at PRIZM. Your age?

  1. before 186%
  2. 18-257%
  3. 25-3532%
  4. 35-5042%
  5. 50 or more13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2024 to 20 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 421,977 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PRIZM Community ENG” (@prizmcoin_eng), 947 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prizmcoin_eng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.