Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мразеприжимошная

@prizhali

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

270subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166523262
TypeChannel
Username@prizhali
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prizhali

Growth

269270269.56 August 2026 — 269 subscribers7 August 2026 — 269 subscribers12 August 2026 — 270 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 269–270 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:13270+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:18269no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:03269first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 May 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2029.0%
🎉913.0%
🫡913.0%
🥰710.1%
🤝57.25%
❤‍🔥45.80%
34.35%
💯34.35%
🔥34.35%
👍22.90%
11.45%
💩11.45%
🤣11.45%
🥴11.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2023 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jun 2026, 06:18 UTC285 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то прижали эту мразь

😁7

15 May 2026, 14:17 UTC503 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то прижали этих мразей

🤝5

15 May 2026, 14:16 UTC380 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @investblog_ru

🇮🇩Власти Бали с мая 2026 года вводят режим «нулевой толерантности» для «цифровых кочевников» с туристическими визами. Любое использование ноутбука в общественных местах будет считаться незаконной трудовой деятельностью. Запрещены оплачиваемые выступления, фотосессии и тренировки.

😁7🫡2

27 Feb 2026, 16:06 UTC576 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то прижали эту мразь

31👍1

29 Dec 2025, 14:23 UTC≈1,600 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то прижимают этих мразей

💯3😁2🫡1

24 Dec 2025, 12:37 UTC677 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то прижали этих мразей

🎉9🥰3🫡1

8 Oct 2025, 20:32 UTC734 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Скорее бы уже прижали эту мразь

❤‍🔥4👍1🤣1

21 Sept 2025, 14:13 UTC758 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Скорее бы уже прижали этих мразей образованных

🥰4🥴1

8 Sept 2025, 17:49 UTC788 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то прижмут эту мразь

😁4🔥3

25 Aug 2025, 09:43 UTC891 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то прижмут этих мразей

💩1

23 Aug 2025, 10:15 UTC563 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наконец-то прижали эту мразь

🫡5

27 Jul 2025, 18:07 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то прижали эту мразь

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prizhali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мразеприжимошная” (@prizhali), 270 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prizhali.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.