Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дилетант широкого профиля

Channel

Дилетант широкого профиля

@privatecase

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

127subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001741740231
TypeChannel
Username@privatecase
DescriptionСубъективное мнение об ивентах в нашей жизни и жизни в ивентах
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 May 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/privatecase

Growth

12710 Aug 2026, 14:31 — 127 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:45 — 127 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:3110 Aug 2026, 14:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–128 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:45127no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:31127first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 31 May 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
3
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 34s
Average length
7m 34s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍746.7%
533.3%
🔥213.3%
🍓16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2022 to 23 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2022, 18:58 UTC603 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Давно ничего не писал. Как-то много всего закружилось. Сегодня напишу. Напишу о том, что каждый должен заниматься своим делом. Я люблю своих/наших/ваших/общих клиентов; но когда клиент вдруг решает, что он лучше организатора знает, как делать мероприятие, ничего хорошего из этого не выходит. Ну почему не позволить делать нашу работу хорошо? Почему не довериться? Почему не признать, что что-то не знаешь сам, а другой

👍21

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

9 Aug 2022, 10:26 UTC545 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ты активный, творческий, креативный, общительный, любишь порядок и высокий темп работы, обожаешь управлять событиями и людьми? 👩🏽‍🎓**МГИМО** объявляет набор на магистерскую программу «Событийный менеджмент» (Event-менеджмент) Выпускники смогут: ✅Организовывать культурно-массовые мероприятия общественно-политического, научно-гуманитарного, спортивного и развлекательного характера ✅Заниматься конгрессно-выставочной и

👍1

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

21 Jul 2022, 08:58 UTC428 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Хочу рекомендовать хороший канал: https://t.me/eventideasaroundtheworld Давайте двигать индустрию вместе!

3🍓1👍1

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

11 Jul 2022, 08:53 UTC486 viewsread 10 August 2026

А у нас тут в спорах и рассуждениях вышел новый выпуск БСМ. И вот мысль возникла: а нет ли тенденции к постепенному огосударствлеванию рынка событийных проектов? https://youtu.be/0HGpB6NAUlc

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

7 Jul 2022, 11:32 UTC297 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Работаем нынче в Новгороде (не в Нижнем, а в Великом) Казалось бы: неполных 200 км от Петербурга, но уже глубокое ощущение неспешности, вневременности, инаковости Такое ощущение, что все в городе знакомы и ивент-индустрия состоит из десятка имён Но если описать ВН коротко: вкусно, вежливо, медленно Даром что финно-угорские черты в каждом втором проглядывают Но и колоритно, конечно

👍31

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

1 Jul 2022, 12:36 UTC257 viewsread 10 August 2026

Вот вам история: Прилетел тут заказ от московских коллег. Хороший заказ. Собираем смету, корректируем, потихонечку поднимаемся в согласованиях с клиентом по внутрикорптративной иерархии все выше и выше. И тут вдруг главный начальник и говорит: нравится, мол, в целом наше предложение, необходимо перед финальными правками и заключением контракта лично познакомиться. - Приходите, - говорит, - к нам в офис. - Отчего ж не

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

28 Jun 2022, 09:32 UTC214 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну вот. Опять я выпал из тг на неделю. Рассказываю, что случилось. А случился замечательный спектакль «Июнь. Россия. Воскресенье…», который мы показали в Нижнем Новгороде 22 июня. Главные роли в постановке сыграли прекрасные актеры, настоящие звёзды мюзиклов Мария Лагацкая-Зимина и Антон Авдеев. Режиссером был я. Продюсером - мой друг и наш Нижегородский партнёр Артём Статин из OQ.Agency. Перенервничали все жутко, но

🔥2

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

20 Jun 2022, 13:56 UTC253 viewsread 10 August 2026

Что-то я немного пропал из-за всяких ПМЭФов и работ Спешу поделиться радостной новостью: вышла свежая серия нашего ток-сериала про боли, соль и мозоли в ивенте. Смотрим! https://zen.yandex.ru/video/watch/62af9cd1cbd91978653eb6cb

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

6 Jun 2022, 11:09 UTC262 viewsread 10 August 2026

Третий выпуск нашей говорильни посвящён техническим директорам. Разбираемся и обсуждаем. Вы - лайкаете и критикуете https://zen.yandex.ru/video/watch/6295d5bd4144d5700a7b0427

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

31 May 2022, 13:28 UTC249 viewsread 10 August 2026

Тут про меня пишут. Спасибо коллегам из НАОМ и event.ru https://event.ru/interviews/pavel-vorontsov-private-case-nenasmotrennost-naivnost-i-nizkiy-uroven-professionalizma-takim-byil-event-ryinok-dubaya-polgoda-nazad/

Signed Pavel Vorontsov

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @privatecase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 999,796 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дилетант широкого профиля” (@privatecase), 127 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privatecase.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.