Hey guys. I'm test driving a newish private note-taking app called Notesnook. Could be a strong contender, especially now that Standard Notes is off the menu. Anyone used Notesnook? 🤔

Channel
Welcome to Privacy 🥸
@privacyphones
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
21subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001531174565 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @privacyphones |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/privacyphones |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 21 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 22 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 22 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 21s
- Average length
- 1m 07s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 60.0% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2023 to 12 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Latest! Thanks L for the great question 💡 https://youtu.be/8ImgrbBvN38
I can't believe how invasive and interwoven it all is (actually.... I can 😏). Years ago, I accepted a gmail account - under sufferance - and stopped using it as soon as I heard about proton. But I didn't completely close gmail, just "unsubscribed" to as much as possible, and some important emails still go to it (-despite my having updated my email address), such as my employer attempting to appear "inclusive". :/ You…
https://youtu.be/zswUCRJUcHk
Was anybody wondering whether the Director ID thing was actually going to be enforced? Here's the first court case on this. TLDR: read 'Editor's note 2" 😉 https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/news-centre/find-a-media-release/2024-releases/24-058mr-asic-brings-first-action-against-a-director-for-failing-to-have-a-director-identification-number/
Proton's not denying the WEF connection...😐💩
Hi JJ, Proton notifications on mobile devices are encrypted. We removed the video link comment above as it was already shared in this channel previously. Regarding the video, we responded above, "The video talks about centralized and decentralized tech. Proton focuses on privacy by default by providing an open source and privacy friendly ecosystem that is audited by third parties. You can also backup all your conte…
Hey guys👋🏼 Curious...what sort of challenges are you running into these days, to do with privacy?
Guys...⚠️ Protonmail = WEF! ⚠️ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIPzwm5eO8I
'Privacy' is Weak & Selfish https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIOVv0PkllY
💯2
New video dropping tonight with breaking news...🚨
What's better than a deGoogled phone, for privacy and security? 🤔
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @privacyphones. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Welcome to Privacy 🥸” (@privacyphones), 21 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privacyphones.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.