Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Privacy

Channel

Privacy

@privacyhub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

223subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001103546945
TypeChannel
Username@privacyhub
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 November 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/privacyhub

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

223224223.56 August 2026 — 224 subscribers7 August 2026 — 224 subscribers3 September 2026 — 223 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 28 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 223–224 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 01:48223-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:03224no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:45224first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Gestione dei rischi degli aggregatori LLM e dei proxy API IA | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/v4Rwu08

1 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC45 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Scopri come funziona la verifica del numero di telefono di Google e se è necessario disattivarla | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/thuOQyi

31 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC43 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Attacchi basati su prompt contro l’assistente IA Gemini e Google Workspace con Gemini | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/sBvJSwr

24 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC67 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Come proteggere i dati dopo la fine di una relazione | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/gEw8uPQ

21 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC71 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Cosa c’è che non va nella funzionalità NameTag di Meta e perché sarebbe opportuno diffidare | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/Aq1w83p

15 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC81 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Perché i CAPTCHA stanno per svanire: come l’IA ha riscritto il test “dimostra di essere umano” | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/Q01a8DT

6 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTC93 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 In che modo gli hacker usano script di PowerShell per rubare gli account di Telegram | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/xAz93il

3 Jul 2026, 08:36 UTC106 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 In che modo Hola Browser è stato utilizzato come arma per diffondere un miner Monero | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/Uow1XOt

29 Jun 2026, 14:36 UTC125 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 XChat di Elon Musk: quanto è sicura la nuova app di messaggistica? | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/Tbd3zMA

20 Jun 2026, 09:36 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Il RAT Argamal: utenti malintenzionati distribuiscono un trojan di accesso remoto tramite giochi hentai | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/NZqG34s

15 Jun 2026, 12:36 UTC107 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Cosa abbiamo imparato al Kaspersky HORIZONS 2026: IA, fiducia e futuro della sicurezza informatica | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/jpDtJbF

8 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTC118 viewsread 7 August 2026

💬 Analisi sulla situazione della sicurezza Wi-Fi in Messico | Blog ufficiale di Kaspersky https://ift.tt/a9RJrZI

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @privacyhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Privacy” (@privacyhub), 223 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privacyhub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.