#тейк / @chernobylcf_bot ☢️
❤4custom 54746483495314501733💘1custom 53055197357801642711
Signed тейки чернобыль кф

Channel
@pripyatchernobylcf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
264subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004308816663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pripyatchernobylcf |
| Description | бот для тейков - @chernobylcf_bot связь с влд - @sovokanon_bot переходник для вп @pripyatchernobylmp 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 29 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pripyatchernobylcf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 264 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:19 | 264 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (29 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,084 |
| Reactions total | 163 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
163 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5474648349531450173 | 51 | 31.3% | |
| custom 5424715429115346672 | 24 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5305519735780164271 | 21 | 12.9% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 12.9% | |
| custom 5460884688744757726 | 11 | 6.75% | |
| 🤬 | 10 | 6.13% | |
| custom 5424808810294296869 | 8 | 4.91% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 4.29% | |
| custom 5352957804183308128 | 5 | 3.07% | |
| 🌭 | 3 | 1.84% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.613% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.613% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#тейк / @chernobylcf_bot ☢️
❤4custom 54746483495314501733💘1custom 53055197357801642711
Signed тейки чернобыль кф
я валяюсь,это моя лучшая инвестиция в жизни😭😭😭покидайте вариантов на что ещё этим дебилом поуказывать I'M CACKLING #тейк / @chernobylcf_bot ☢️
custom 542471542911534667210❤4custom 54746483495314501731
Signed тейки чернобыль кф
Зимняя Припять #post / @chernobylcf_bot ☢️ cr : chernobylsky7 (tt)
custom 547464834953145017311❤7custom 54247154291153466724custom 53055197357801642712
Signed @SA
я не знаю, подходит ли пож тематику, но можете посоветовать какие нибудь видосы про радиацию / ядерную энергетику ? #тейк / @chernobylcf_bot ☢️
custom 547464834953145017310custom 54608846887447577265🍓3custom 53055197357801642712custom 54247154291153466721
Signed тейки чернобыль кф
Тв СССР в первые дни после аварии #post / @chernobylcf_bot ☢️ cr : @pivnenko (yt)
🤬10custom 53055197357801642715custom 54608846887447577263❤2custom 54746483495314501732😨1custom 53529578041833081281custom 54247154291153466721
Signed @SA
прив,а широкой публике вообще известно что-нибудь о личности в.п.волкова??я видела кучу ссылок на данную личность,но при ближайшем рассмотрении не могу найти никаких трудов/архивов/даже страницы в вики,только статья о том,что не состоялась защита его диссертации по безопасности рбмк в 89 году..если располагаете какой-то инфой,то поделитесь пожалуйста,может это просто я искать не умею #тейк / @chernobylcf_bot ☢️
custom 54746483495314501738🌭3custom 53529578041833081283custom 54247154291153466722❤1custom 53055197357801642711custom 54608846887447577261
Signed тейки чернобыль кф
Ребят, я хз подходит ли этот тейк строго под тематику, но у кого нибудь есть стикеры с сериалом Чернобыль от HBO? Не важно с кем то конкретным или общие, все кидайте, если есть. Гифки тоже подойдут #тейк / @chernobylcf_bot ☢️
custom 54746483495314501735🍓3custom 53055197357801642713custom 53529578041833081281custom 54247154291153466721custom 54248088102942968691
Signed тейки чернобыль кф
о переезде переезд был с целью отсеять мертвую аудиторию и в принципе начать канал с чистого листа, ибо прошлый мы действительно засрали вп. в новом канале будем делать мнимальное количество вп (менее 5 на день и не каждый день !) и постараемся делать больше постов ( кстати, у нас открыт набор в адм по постам ! ), также, если бы вы хотели что то добавить / исправить, напишите об этом в комментарии !
custom 54248088102942968696❤3custom 53055197357801642713custom 54746483495314501733custom 54247154291153466721
Signed @SA
🙃😀😃😉😍 😀😆🙂 🤩 для этого заполните анкету ниже и киньте в коммы под этим постом✨ 😊😉🙃😘🥹🙃😘 1. имя , эмодзи 🤩 2. сколько тейков сможете делать в неделю? (нужно хотя бы 2-3) ⬅️ 3. любой опыт в кфкм ( без опыта берем, НО У ВАС ДОЛЖНО БЫТЬ ПОНИМАНИЕ, ЧТО ОТ ВАС ТРЕБУЕТСЯ, чтоб мы не разжевывали все что можно и нельзя) 🤩 4. умеете пользоваться отложкой, знаете, что это такое, сможете следовать расписанию 10 00 - 19 00 мск? ➕…
custom 54746483495314501733custom 53055197357801642711custom 54247154291153466721custom 54608846887447577261
Signed @SA
🙃😀😄🥲😁😀😋🥲🥸 ☢️ 1. рт пост 2. вп пост 3. бот 4. адм состав 5. набор в адм по контенту 6. буст ( пж, у нас будут реакции с радиацией ) принимаются любые тейки / вопросы, связанные с чернобылем и припятью! не стесняйтесь их отправлять 🤩 🤍🤍
custom 54746483495314501733custom 53055197357801642711custom 54247154291153466721custom 54608846887447577261
Signed @SA
адм состав ☢️ ☢️| иссянсяо 🇷🇺 влд ☢️| Соур 🍀/🌟 контент ☢️| Вердикт 🌟 контент ☢️| The one that didn't want to❕контент здесь могли бы быть вы . . .
custom 53055197357801642712custom 54247154291153466722custom 54746483495314501732🍓1
Signed @SA
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @pripyatchernobylcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,058,460 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“БЫЛ ПЕРЕЕЗД Припять / Чернобыль кф” (@pripyatchernobylcf), 264 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pripyatchernobylcf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.