🟢Отбой ракетной опасности
🙏4

Channel
@prigrani4ie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
58,387subscribers
-382 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001761913600 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prigrani4ie |
| Description | Реклама: @reklama_32bot Админ: @prigrani4ie_bot VK: https://vk.com/prigrani4ie МАХ: https://max.ru/prigrani4ie РКН: https://clck.ru/3NuRKG |
| Created | 14 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prigrani4ie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 58,387 | -551 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 58,938 | +257 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 58,681 | +276 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 58,405 | -165 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 58,570 | +351 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 58,219 | -305 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 58,524 | -262 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 58,786 | +17 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 58,769 | first reading |
131 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 126 of 131 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 131 (5 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 361,790 |
| Reactions total | 1,959 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,959 reactions across 126 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 833 | 42.5% | |
| ❤ | 451 | 23.0% | |
| 👍 | 412 | 21.0% | |
| 😡 | 155 | 7.91% | |
| ⚡ | 108 | 5.51% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 126 of the 131 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,959reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 131 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟢Отбой ракетной опасности
🙏4
🚨Брянская область ракетная опасность
🙏18👍2⚡1❤1
‼️Егор Ковальчук: Еще один удар ВСУ нанесли по Дятьковскому району. Пострадавших нет. Есть последствия удара по гражданским объектам. Все службы работают на местах. Оцениваем последствия, определяем работы по восстановлению.
🙏16👍3❤1
🟢Отбой ракетной опасности
🙏10
‼️Егор Ковальчук: Укронацисты атаковали город Брянск ВСУ атаковали ракетами жилой дом в Советском районе города Брянска. На данный момент один человек погиб, шесть пострадавших. Они доставлены в больницу, где им оказывается вся необходимая медицинская помощь. В жилом доме возник пожар, ведется ликвидация последствий. Жильцы дома эвакуированы. Оцениваем последствия, восстаанвоение будет организовано.
🙏52👍4⚡3❤1
🇷🇺Младший сержант Станислав Макаров выполнял боевую задачу в составе штурмовой группы по овладению опорным пунктом противника на важном тактическом направлении. В ходе боя, несмотря на интенсивный огонь и атаки FPV-дронов, он обнаружил два пулеметных расчета, сдерживавших продвижение группы. Используя складки местности, Макаров скрытно приблизился к огневым точкам и ручными гранатами уничтожил оба пулеметных расчета…
❤15⚡2
‼️Брянская область беспилотная опасность
🙏15⚡2👍2
🚨Брянская область ракетная опасность
🙏19⚡2👍2
‼️Егор Ковальчук ВСУ продолжают атаковать Брянскую область В поселке Сныткино Брасовского района в результате атаки беспилотников ранен местный житель. Он госпитализирован, медики оказывают всю необходимую помощь. Всего за прошедшие сутки над территорией Брянской области подразделениями ПВО Министерства обороны РФ, мобильно-огневыми группами бригады «БАРС-Брянск», МОГ Брянского ЛО МВД России на транспорте, спецподр…
🙏10❤4
🚨ФСБ и МВД привлекут к ответственности двух жителей Енакиево за публикацию видео обстрелов ВСУ ➖️Сегодня ночью два жителя Енакиево опубликовали в одном из городских чатов видео последствий террористического удара ВСУ. ➖️Враг автоматически скачал видео из городского чата и опубликовал на своих ресурсах. ➖️Молодые люди позволили противнику получить кадры попаданий и поставили под угрозу работу экстренных служб. ➖️З…
❤2
🇺🇦Черниговская область: бусификация продолжается В черниговских соцсетях распространяется видео, как мужчину сотрудники ТЦК вытаскивают прямо из дома, сажают в бус и увозят в неизвестном направлении. Это небольшой город Корюковка. Люди негодуют и возмущаются беспределу, который творят «ТЦКуны» и сотрудники полиции. Valentina Wind: Ага, сьогодні їхала в міському транспорті, у маршрутці, зупинили співробітники ТЦК, …
❤2
⚡️Фронтовая сводка 13 августа ➖️На Херсонском направлении ВС РФ ФАБами поразили крупный логистический центр в районе Чернобаевки. В центре Херсона наши уничтожают любой движущийся транспорт. Противник обстрелял за сутки 8 сёл. ➖️На Западном фланге Запорожского участка ВС РФ сохраняют инициативу и атакуют по рубежу Степногорск-Павловка, системно бьют по укрытиям врага в Малокатериновке. В Орехове идут очень тяжёлые …
🙏4❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 131 posts we hold for @prigrani4ie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 339,250 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Приграничье Брянск 🇷🇺” (@prigrani4ie), 58,387 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prigrani4ie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.