Channel
@prigovor_adminskiy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
155subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002077642054 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prigovor_adminskiy |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 13 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prigovor_adminskiy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 155 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 156 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 156 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 13 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
16 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 8 | 50.0% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 12.5% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2024 to 21 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• Дело было к вечеру, делать было нечего. Примерно полгода назад я пишу своему постоянному рекламодателю — Тинькофф. Я случайно увидел их рекламу в сетке Мидаса и решил предупредить их о том, что сетка накручена. Зачем агентству просто так выкидывать деньги. (скрин N5). Как итог, несколько дней назад в канале Мидаса со стоимость 140 тысяч рублей снова появляется реклама Тинькофф. Здесь есть большой парадокс: бывает …
❤1👍1
Сейчас кратко расскажу про накрученную сетку каналов с доходом от 10 миллионов, как Тинькофф сливает свои деньги, как в вычислении ботов помогает новая функция Телеграм и почему об этом молчат. • Король накрученных каналов и ботоводов — Мидас. Это тг-админ, который сделал самую крупную сеть успешных (!) каналов. Чтобы единоразово купить рекламу во всей его сетке вы должны заплатить 1.553.500 рублей (скрин 1 — там не…
👍1
UPD Утром мне пишет человек, спрашивает, мой ли закупщик вот это тело @buyIansky Я говорю что нет Пишу этому сладкому, @buyIansky, что он ничего не понимает и пора действовать, потом пошли угрозы на скринах. Его аккаунты и каналы: @buyIansky и @buyiansky @ElegancePr https://t.me/joinchat/7T_C0glAh-FiYTcy
💩3
Друзья всем привет Не рекомендую сотрудничать с @BesPontoviy Суть вопроса: У нас есть канал SEXология @BesPontoviy решил сделать себе абсолютно такой же канал. Вот ссылка на его канал t.me/xxxx_pornooo_facts_videos Начал с заимствования нашего креатива. После первой просьбы не использовать наш креатив он ответил согласием, но продолжил использование креатива. На просьбу не брать с канала контент, за который мы плати…
💩5🖕3❤1😁1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @prigovor_adminskiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@prigovor_adminskiy named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Админский Приговор” (@prigovor_adminskiy), 155 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prigovor_adminskiy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.