всего-то двадцать лет попыток и мои глаза наконец согласилась на прокрас слизистой! что дальше, может и межресничку разрешат?
❤9

Channel
@prfmnk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
165subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001316738036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prfmnk |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prfmnk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 165 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 165 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (10 August 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 153 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
99 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 99 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
всего-то двадцать лет попыток и мои глаза наконец согласилась на прокрас слизистой! что дальше, может и межресничку разрешат?
❤9
новая сыворотка из dm‘а, плюсы: — класснючий состав — прикольная текстура — очень радует мою капец привередливую кожу — стоит четыре евро минусы — пахнет ведром свежевыловленных карасей
❤2
upd бронь продолжаю разбор, и сегодня у нас messe de minuit by etro, остаток от 50 мл: https://www.fragrantica.ru/perfume/Etro/Messe-de-Minuit-4348.html покупался в период любви к ДРАМАТИЧНОМУ ЛАДАНУ, лет пятнадцать назад. людям на фрагрантике духи пахнут приятной сладостью, и я бы тоже рада её унюхать, но первые годы парфманьячества в карман не спрячешь — до сих пор слышу в полуночной мессе сладость разложения🌚 …
❤2
upd продано решила разобрать и частично распродать запасы, стартую с самого всратого флакона коллекции. внимание, натуральные духи из кирзачей копчёного чая: Providence Perfume, Lapsang lover всё-таки натуралка не моё, а жаль! 75 евро + доставка dhl, отправка из германии. в комменты положу ещё фото продано
крем для тела от коллабы острикова и scent hunters просто космос. и увлажнение отличное (даже моя очень требовательная кожа с фолликулярным кератозом довольна), и запах офигенный. пахнет абрикосами и кошачьим пузиком, нежно и ненавязчиво. оч жалко что лимитка 😭
❤7
тем временем купила десятку tom ford café rose. смотрела на неё три года, но не в тот сезон, осенью. а тут затестила зимой и поняла что вот же они, «кашемировые духи», чтобы поливаться перед сном в качестве komfort scent luxury edition! собраны конечно красивуще, и никаких там ноток (устала я чёто от ноток), просто единый красивый аккорд. десятка стоила вполне человечески 33 евро, и зацените какой симпатичный у неё…
❤12
омг омг, у прады выходят духи с масалой! обожаю масалу, интересуюсь всем чайным, но сандал на мне исключительно солёными огурчиками садится. и лактонные ноты мозг высверливают. в общем, заинтересована, жду когда у нас появится
❤4
в местном лаше распродажа, за 21 евро утащила вот этого господина. пахнет цветочным магазом, если бы его держали лесные гномы и продавали там не цветы, а мох и свежесрезанную траву) мокро-горьковато-зелёный, ужасно красивый. напоминает лашевскую же принцессу былинку, только горечи поменьше, влажного воздуха побольше.
❤10
спустя годы поисков боги винтеда благословили меня и послали эту старенькую рождественскую лимитку от jo malone. фанатею от сочетания шоколада с апельсином, в парфюме до сих пор не встречала. сами ноты много где, но как часть более сложной истории. а мне просто апельсиновую шоколадку! желательно молочную. или в крайнем случае печеньку/ликёр с таким вкусом) и вот bitter orange and chocolate ровно как надо, простые и…
❤13
горячая рекомендация сезонной свечки от glade. стоит четыре евро, пахнет на все, не бесит. сожгла целиком, планирую повторить
❤1
также каждый год смотрела на ёлковые диффузоры jo malone, но больно кусаче они стоят. а ща у них 30% на старую рождественскую коллекцию, получается всё ещё кусаче, но уже терпимо 😅
❤5
открыла вторую банку этого гидрофильного бальзама, и хочу сказать что он идеален. хорошо эмульгирует, не оставляет плёнки на лице, плотной текстуры но легко набирается пальцем, приятно пахнет лавандой, стоит пятихатку. botavikos моё уважение
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @prfmnk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сенсорный перегруз” (@prfmnk), 165 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prfmnk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.