9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1,832. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,252–16,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 18:18
15,633
-512
13 Aug 2026, 11:16
16,145
+182
12 Aug 2026, 13:55
15,963
+2,334
11 Aug 2026, 15:45
13,629
-35
10 Aug 2026, 14:25
13,664
-53
9 Aug 2026, 17:51
13,717
-49
8 Aug 2026, 15:44
13,766
-35
7 Aug 2026, 17:46
13,801
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:33
13,801
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.21%
avg views ÷ 15,633 subscribers
Avg views / post
659
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
15 (6 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
9,222
Reactions total
261
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
261 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
261
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Апдейт по видео: за неделю ролик набрал 500 тыс. просмотров 👀
— видео принесло 284 подписки, также получили около 15 запросов в директ и более 70 комментариев от пациентов, где клиника и врач отвечали о стоимости
А как вы считаете, это много или мало?
Нашла просто очаровательное место в Москве
— меня так закрутила жизнь, что я не успеваю делиться событиями, но скоро все расскажу и покажу
📍Place Chase
Когда весь мир использует Claude, а ты знаешь только Claude Monet 🖼️🖼️
или немного о том, какие видео мне скидывает Даша, мой любимый English-коуч 🏴
Мы тут недавно говорили про акцент, я считаю максимально крутым британский акцент, Даша тоже и у нее потрясающее произношение, но слышала, что многие наоборот предпочитают американский. Вы на какой стороне?
Открыта запись на стратегические консультации по ведению блога, выходу в социальные сети 🖇️
⚪️как начать вести блог - весь путь от выбора площадок (ведь есть не только тгк!) до полноценного роста как блогера, который ходит на мероприятия и работает с брендами
⚪️как выбирать темы, как раскрыть то, что мне нравится, как не потерять себя в ведении блога
⚪️как начать сотрудничать с брендами
⚪️как набирать подписчиков…
Я решила поэксперементировать со стилем
— и отчасти вдохновилась модой поколения Z - объемные джинсы, толстовка на несколько размеров больше, футболка с принтом и кросовки на грубой подошве. Получился комфортный образ, в котором мне дали 20 лет 😂 так что совет всем, кто хочет чувствовать себя моложе - обратить внимание на позиции из CR.
Оставлю артикулы:
Футболка 971408431
Толстовка 848246162
Джинсы 725122506
CR -…
🇮🇹 Ужин по-итальянски с подругами
— атмсофера выдержана в стиле итальянского бистро, полное меню итальянской кухни, большая винная карта и в меню есть позиции с необычной подачей, такие как паста в сырной голове 🧀
Стараюсь более правильно питаться, поэтому брала запеченого сибаса с овощами и зеленый салат с цукини, брокколи 🥦 и авокадо 🥑 - мой фаворит. Но пасты и говяжьи щечки тут тоже отменные.
Прекрасное место …
У меня есть подружка. Она владелица digital-агентства, только они работают с медициной.
И каждый раз, когда я ей что-то рассказываю про агентство - что сделали, какой результат получили, что поменяли, она мне говорит:
- Юля, это очень круто. Срочно рассказывай об этом в своем канале.
А я каждый раз такая:
- Да что тут такого? Это же просто работа.
И вот мне кажется, в этом самая большая проблема.
Когда каждый ден…
Аромат той самой clean girl 🌸
— пожалуй, белый мускус - самый любимый аромат в линейке Tesori d’Oriente
Я уже в Питере и начинаю разбирать свои посылки, в этой был:
🔤парфюмированный спрей
🔤кондиционер для белья 🤍 - именно его я всегда покупаю в Золотом яблоке
🔤крем для тела в элегантной жестяной банке
🔤твердое ароматическое мыло 🌸идеально для аромата свежести в шкафу
🔤гель для душа с белым мускусом
🥣 Эстетика cle…
Ну что сказать, день сегодня меня порадовал 💔💔💔
— вот такие результаты у клиентов loyalty-buro.ru
❤22
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @preventmarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 154,790 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MARIA STIUF” (@preventmarketing), 15,633 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/preventmarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.