Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PreventAge® | ПревентЭйдж

@preventage_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,916subscribers

+94 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003771986945
TypeChannel
Username@preventage_official
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/preventage_official

Growth

5,8195,9165,867.57 August 2026 — 5,822 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,819 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,841 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5,916 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,804–5,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 17:355,916+75
10 Aug 2026, 13:085,841+22
7 Aug 2026, 14:585,819-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:315,822first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.68%
avg views ÷ 5,916 subscribers
Avg views / post
573
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held10 (5 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total5,725
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 44s
Average length
4m 44s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

112 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7869.6%
🔥1513.4%
👍76.25%
👎54.46%
🤯21.79%
10.893%
😁10.893%
😢10.893%
🤔10.893%
🥰10.893%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC409 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Почему люди выбирают микродозинг мухомора и что важно знать врачу? «Я принимаю микродозы мухомора. Лучше сплю, меньше тревожусь и легче переношу стресс». ✔️Этот тренд активно обсуждается в социальных сетях. В 23 году был опубликован анализ 5600 сообщений пользователей, регулярно принимавших Amanita muscaria, наиболее частыми причинами, по которым они начинали использование микродозинга мухомора, — это попытка справ

6

11 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC461 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как действует врач с интегративным мышлением? В предыдущем посте мы разобрали четыре механизма, которые удерживают пациента в болезни: хроническое воспаление, лептинорезистентность, митохондриальную дисфункцию и нарушение работы кишечника. Теперь главный вопрос: как перевести эти знания в клиническую практику? 😊 Интегративный врач не назначает лечение «по анализам». Он последовательно воздействует на каждый из выя

5👍2

10 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC619 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

😊Не всё, что называют митохондриальным протектором, защищает митохондрии В функциональной и превентивной медицине легко попасть в ловушку: если средство стимулирует работу митохондрий, значит, оно полезно. CoQ10, PQQ, NAD+, «старый новый» метиленовый синий, сукцинат, митохондриальные пептиды... Казалось, что клетке всегда можно добавить энергии. ❗️Но митохондрия не аккумулятор, который достаточно подключить к зар

11👍4🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC578 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😊 Один пациент — два подхода. Почему интегративный взгляд дает результат там, где клинические рекомендации буксуют? Возвращаемся к нашему пациенту: мужчина, 47 лет, ИМТ 29,8, абдоминальное ожирение, стеатоз S2-S3, инсулинорезистентность, лептинорезистентность, дислипидемия. Классический протокол мы уже разобрали: статины, коррекция гликемии, контроль раз в полгода. Показатели в бланке изменились. Пациенту не легче

18🔥3👍1

9 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC618 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😊 Три системные ловушки, в которые попадает врач при работе с пациентом с хроническими заболеваниями! В прошлом посте мы оставили вопрос: протокол соблюден, а пациенту не легче. Разбираемся, почему так происходит👇 ✅Ловушка первая: лечим показатель, а не механизм. Статины снижают ЛПНП. Но повышенный холестерин у нашего пациента — это следствие инсулинорезистентности, хронического воспаления и дисфункции печени. М

121👎1

8 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC645 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😊 Рубрика: “Клинический конфликт” ❓Что делать дальше, если протокол соблюдён, а результата нет? Знакомая ситуация?🧐 Вы действуете строго по клиническим рекомендациям. Лечение назначено. Анализы становятся лучше. Но пациент продолжает жаловаться на усталость, тягу к сладкому, лишний вес и отсутствие изменений в самочувствии. 📍Клинический случай. Мужчина, 45 лет, ИМТ 29,6, абдоминальное ожирение, жировая болезнь п

8👎1🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC692 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

😊 3-ий модуль Школы Интегративной педиатрии «Детская интегративная гастроэнтерология, диетология и нутрициология» Друзья, 8–9 августа посвящаем два дня модулю «Детская интегративная гастроэнтерология, диетология и нутрициология». Собрали в нем самые частые запросы из педиатрической практики — от возрастной «нормы» развития пищеварительной системы до сложных случаев DGBI (Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction), билиар

1👎1🤔1😁1

7 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC551 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😊 Клинический случай: как микробиота объяснила то, что не объясняли анализы? Девочка, 7 лет. На приёме — мама с большой папкой распечатанных анализов и консультативных заключений от специалистов. В папке — путь длиной в полтора года: три педиатра, гастроэнтеролог, аллерголог, дерматолог, невролог, ее консультировали профессора и кандидаты наук, лучшие врачи. Диагнозы менялись и лечение тоже. Жалобы: – атопический

4🔥4👎1🤯1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC579 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❓Гипоацидность у ребёнка: норма или патология? «Мы уже полгода пьём железо, а анализы не меняются» 😔 Коллеги, знакомая фраза с приёма? С жалобами на то, что ребенок «плохо ест», «отказывается от мяса», «быстро устаёт», «болит живот» педиатр сталкивается практически на каждом приеме. При физикальном осмотре у таких детей отмечается бледность кожи и слизистых и “синева” под глазами, рутинный клинический анализ кро

5🔥5👎1😢1

5 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC573 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Анатомия рецидива: почему грибок возвращается? ❗️Пациент лечится годами, а кандидоз неизменно возвращается. Причина, как правило, не в препарате. Ситуация знакомая большинству специалистов. После курса антибиотикотерапии на обеднённой микробиоте «расцветает» грибок. В ответ назначается антимикотик, приходит облегчение, а спустя несколько недель всё повторяется. Круг замыкается: антибиотики → нарушение микробиоты

8

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @preventage_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 280,123 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PreventAge® | ПревентЭйдж” (@preventage_official), 5,916 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/preventage_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.