ㅤ ⭐️⭐️ @annemathers 𝙰𝚂 ⭐️⭐️ 𝙲𝙰𝚁𝚁𝙸𝙴 𝙱𝚁𝙰𝙳𝚂𝙷𝙰𝚆 🩷🤩efinido por uma mistura criativa, ousada e eclética (high-low) que une peças vintage, alfaiataria, itens românticos e tendências da moda. Marcas registradas incluem os vestidos de seda slip dress, saias de tule, cintos poderosos sobre roupas, flores grandes como acessório e sapatos de salto alto, muitas vezes com um toque parisiense ou boêmio. ㅤ

Channel
︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ 𝑝𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗒 𐚁 ، 𝗋𝗈𝗌𝓮
@prettyrosex
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002221657437 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prettyrosex |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prettyrosex |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 93 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 93 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 26 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 18s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 💋 🦢 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝓇𝗼𝘀𝗲 ʜı𝗀𝗁𝗅ı𝗀ʜ𝗍 . 🩷 ◜🩷◞ ﹫𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘁𝗮𝗴🩷 🩷 ۫ ָ֢ 𑁯 ⬦ ☁️ 𝒔𝗐𝖾𝖾ᴛ 𝖽𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗆𝗌 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 𝖺𝗋𝖾 ⸵ 𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈ғ ᴛ𝗁𝗂𝗌 . . . 🩷 ۫ ָ֢ ﹫ ╱#𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗡𝗚𝖯𝖨𝖩𝖠𝖬𝖠𝖲⠀ 🩷 ࣪ ִֶָ 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝓹𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗒 𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗒 ! ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 💋 🦢 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝓇𝗼𝘀𝗲 ʜı𝗀𝗁𝗅ı𝗀ʜ𝗍 . 🩷 ◜🩷◞ ﹫𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘁𝗮𝗴🩷 🩷 ۫ ָ֢ 🍸 ˳ ׄ ⬦ 𝗐𝖺т𝖼𝗁 м𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 т𝗁𝖾 ⠀⠀⠀⠀𝗇𝗂𝗀𝗁т 𝖺𝗐𝖺𝗒 : #𝗗𝗥𝗢𝗣𝗘𝖭𝖨𝖦𝖧𝖳 🩷 ࣪ ִֶָ 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝓹𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗒 𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗒 ! ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 💋 🦢 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗐 𝓇𝗼𝘀𝗲 ʜı𝗀𝗁𝗅ı𝗀ʜ𝗍 . 🩷 ◜🩷◞ ﹫𝖺𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗋𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘁𝗮𝗴🩷 🩷 ۫ ָ֢ ℐ'm the ᴅiɑmond ⠀ ⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀o𝖿 the 𝘀𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻◌ ׅ 💍̷̻ 🩷 ۫ ָ֢ #𝐏𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗇 🩷 ࣪ ִֶָ 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝓹𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗒 𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗋𝗒 ! ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @prettyrosex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,005,031 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@prettyrosex named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ 𝑝𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗍𝗒 𐚁 ، 𝗋𝗈𝗌𝓮” (@prettyrosex), 93 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prettyrosex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.