(BINANCE) #ALPHAUSDT Long Now : 0.038 to 0.040 Target : 0.043 - 0.044 - 0.045

Channel
CryptoCoin Premium Signals
@premiumsignals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001125207007 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @premiumsignals |
| Description | We Provide high Quality Crypto Signals. Scroll up And Check our Past Signal 🚀 Profit Ranges from 5-20% Maximum members allowed is 1k JOIN OUR TELEGRAM CHANNEL Based on Binance Contact me @@@ Admin- @xeduzanta ☟ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2017 and 31 August 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/premiumsignals |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 76 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 76 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 194
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 164
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
BTC UPDATE:- BTC is going pretty well so far. Breaks an important resistance level of $45k-$46k and currently trading above $47k What we can expect from here? BTC need some retracement now and it might came down to retest the $45k level and then again starts pumping. When BTC came down to retest that will be the best time to enter in some Alts. Till then it's better to books some profit and keep your SL tight. Whe…
Bitcoin investors have realised large losses during this sell-off, with net daily losses between $600M and $875M/day. Whilst these are significant sums, they remain small relative to $1B+ losses realised during the May-June capitulation, and the deleveraging of 4-December
We expected a bounce and it happened. BTC is doing exceptionally good here. It went as expected. If the uptrend continues then $49k to $50k will be the possible target like we said it in our previous chart. Remember: BTC has bounced 11% so far after bouncing back from $43400. You can clearly see that it is a straight multiple green candles which is not good to be honest. We are expecting the price to reach $50k but …
Photo, posted without a caption
This was something unexpected. A 19% price drop from $52956 to $42900 is no joke. A complete market manipulation. The drop in BTC price has certainly taken a bearish turn forming two important supports. Support 1 is at $46700 from where the BTC price is bouncing back, currently. Support 2 is at $43900, a strong support where BTC left a long shadow. The most worried part is BTC has gone down below the 200 MA. Last tim…
(BINANCE) #OCEANUSDT Buy Below : 0.8700 And hold
BTC weekly update: Finally, we closed above the 21D MA which is a good sign but looks like things are still a little skeptical. The BTC price did close above the 21 MA but it isn't convincing. Is it a trap before the fall or is it a rally towards the new ATH? BTC can go higher than the current price making a new ATH ($70K). But this can only happen if BTC shows some good momentum in this coming week. On the other …
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
This ain't a good sign, folks. In the 4 hrs chart, after the bounce, when the candle closed (which was the daily close as well), BTC price dropped down from $32800 to $31600 (-3.5%). This invalidated the 3rd bounce scenario. Currently, it has closed down below the short-term support line. Could this be a fakedown or a real breakdown? If BTC continues to follow our chart then you all know where we all are heading. …
I am not posting any signals. Will continue once market stabilize
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @premiumsignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,350,044 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoCoin Premium Signals” (@premiumsignals), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/premiumsignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.