Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 49 days, net -255. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,405–7,749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 15:57
7,454
+9
16 Sept 2026, 17:57
7,445
-33
12 Sept 2026, 11:56
7,478
-42
2 Sept 2026, 21:25
7,520
+5
30 Aug 2026, 20:34
7,515
-20
27 Aug 2026, 10:13
7,535
-86
24 Aug 2026, 15:33
7,621
-25
20 Aug 2026, 15:23
7,646
-15
17 Aug 2026, 18:47
7,661
-18
14 Aug 2026, 23:25
7,679
-24
11 Aug 2026, 06:55
7,703
-2
8 Aug 2026, 03:14
7,705
-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:31
7,709
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:23
7,709
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 40 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
4,550 reactions across 39 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2,175
47.8%
👍
1,063
23.4%
❤
614
13.5%
⚡
162
3.56%
🤝
158
3.47%
👏
119
2.62%
🤩
76
1.67%
💋
59
1.30%
🤓
25
0.549%
🎃
22
0.484%
😢
19
0.418%
🍓
16
0.352%
🫡
12
0.264%
🕊
7
0.154%
🥰
6
0.132%
🐳
5
0.11%
👌
4
0.088%
😨
4
0.088%
😍
3
0.066%
🤷♂
1
0.022%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,550 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
198
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 40 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
168
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @premiumscalp7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
NewYorkda u bu kim boʻlsa koʻrishvoraman erta inding agar tajribali treyder boʻlsa yanayam yaxshi boʻlardi aloqaga chiqinglar shunaqasidan boʻlsa
Insta Direkt orqali
Treyd masalasini bugun foydali tajribalarni sizlarga ulashib qoʻyaman xulosalarim oxirgi 3 kunda va keyingi haftaga rejalarim treydingda tanishib fikringiz qoldirarsizlar !
Oʻtirib gaplashadigan insonlarsizlarda koʻngli tozagayam oʻxshaysizlar lekin bir tomonda :)
Man bir oʻylab koʻray qani pozitsiyamni qanday yaxshilay olaman.
2 ta yoʻl bor:
1. Riskka amal qilmaslik
2. Riskka amal qilmagan holatdagi tajribani unutish
Hozir riskka amal qilyaomanu lekin qoʻlimdagi tajribam risksiz savdolar ortidan yigʻilgan aslida manimcha tugun shu yerda
Hafta oxiri yoqmadi nimagadir ….
Oldingidek shasht yoʻq energiya sust treydda sezgandirsizlar :|
Stop bilan ishlayapman birgina oʻzgarish shu. Man sezdim bu kitobda yozilgani stop bilan ishla riskka amal qil u qil bu qil xullas bular choʻpchak shekilli oʻzi koʻp yozilgan narsalar insonlarni boshqarish uchun faqatgina birgina bitikdan tashqari deb oʻylayman
2 ta padryatam stop olamanmi-e, nu xay chert poberi glavny…
Sizlardayam uzuuun bitta liniya sellga buzilganmi ?
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @premiumscalp7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MAGDAG INVEST 📊 @magdag_invest_uz · 31,078 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 11 September 2026
XAUUSD KILLER @XAUUSD_KILLER_2026 · 9 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 4 September 2026
BEK TRADER @bektrpro · 34,027 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 4 September 2026
KUSHUZ @trader_uuz · 1,588 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 4 September 2026
𝗛𝗬𝗕𝗥𝗜𝗗 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 @hybrid_scalp · 60,497 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 25 August 2026
𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗜𝗡𝗩𝗘𝗦𝗧 @Trade_InvestUz · 70,655 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 26 August 2026
Nazirov FX🦅 @nazirov_fxf · 30,645 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 6 September 2026
Aziz Halikov @azizhalikov · 88,448 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 August 2026
R.S.T | INVEST @RST_invest · 31,280 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 5 September 2026
MQL5 Алготрейдинг @mql5ru · 20,218 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 28 September 2026
Madina Kamilovna @MadinaCrypto · 20,173 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 September 2026
THE ART OF TRADING @TRADEWITHUK500 · 21,344 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 24 September 2026
Волновой Анализ 🥇 @Elliotrading · 50,192 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
YoForex Gold @yoforexgold · 93,205 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 15 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Premium Scalp | by Ali” (@premiumscalp7), 7,454 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/premiumscalp7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.