Channel
@premierleaguew
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
114subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002466649746 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @premierleaguew |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 1 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/premierleaguew |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 114 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 115 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 115 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (1 March 2025 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 March 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 泰国华人柬埔寨新闻曝光 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 印尼LoopDNS资讯播报【000体育独家冠名】 📢 ◒迪拜曝光|迪拜新闻◒ 迪拜资讯 📢 东南亚吃瓜悬赏令 📢 缅甸缅北东南亚新闻曝光 📢 菲律宾资讯◒《菲律宾曝光》菲律宾新闻 📢 蓝点网数字科技新闻 📢 tg|飞机号|飞机老号|tg号 📢 科技&趣闻&链闻 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
🟢体育丨电竞丨真人百家乐丨彩票丨棋牌丨电子丨捕鱼 🟢 实力品牌|超强赞助 🟢 不黑不卡不杀猪|输赢正常出款 🟢 亚洲最具实力平台|等你体验 🟢🟢彩金申请🟢🟢 @TGAD666 👇👇注册网址👇👇 👇👇注册网址👇👇 开 云 体 育 ： http://kai231.com 米 兰 体 育 ： http://ml127.vip 九 游 娱 乐 ： http://jyty486.com 🔴部分国家IP限制，需要开VPN挂中国/香港ip进入注册 博88 平台不限制IP，支持USDT存提款，畅玩无忧！ 🏆七大主流游戏➡️体育、棋牌、彩票、真人、电子、电竞，捕鱼一应俱全。 🏆网站平台不限IP、不需要手机号、出入款速度快、通道齐全、大额无忧。 🏆全原生态，自主研发独立伺服器，24小…
我们这个周末回来了🤗
仅 5 分就与排名第四的曼城和排名第十的阿斯顿维拉相差 5 分！😬哪支球队将赢得欧洲资格赛的冠军？
告诉我们您最喜欢的守门员是谁以及为什么
阿斯顿维拉、阿森纳、利物浦、热刺、曼联和切尔西本周将进入欧洲16强！
那个萨拉赫的传球😩
克里斯蒂亚诺·罗纳尔多 VS 富勒姆的进球目录🫢
❤1
周末可能错过的事情😅
球员对埃迪·恩凯蒂亚为俱乐部打进的第一个英超进球的反应🫂他们已经以 3-1 获胜了！
在哪里✨萨拉赫 2024/25✨在英超联赛中最伟大的个人赛季中排名？ 还剩下 10 场比赛，我们查看了档案🔍 🧵(1/6)
🧵(2/6)
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @premierleaguew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 408,384 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“英超联赛” (@premierleaguew), 114 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/premierleaguew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.