Channel
@predictumvipfree
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
127subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001537016188 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @predictumvipfree |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 27 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/predictumvipfree |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 127 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 127 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
(2/2) Expose: Just Now a Leaker Gave CELR Signal Strategy Name: CELRUSDTPREP And There is No Official CELRUSDTPREP By Predictum CELRUSDTPREP is Not Available in Predictum Strategies (Double Check In Their Channel) Idiots Don't Have Mind Proved Again. This is Not The First Time They've Sent a Strategy That is Not Mentioned By Predictum Now After This Expose You Might Get Strategies That is Mentioned By The Predi…
(1/2) Expose: Most of the Predictum Leak Channels Shares Signals Daily But all Fake 🤣 Beware of Them, They Will Scam try to scam you more than a single time. And Will Offer You Lifetime Too (Scam)
We Sell Predictum [Original] and 35+ VIP in Just $50 Check Here 👇 @VIPLeaksClub (Pinned Message) We Don't Sell Predictum Separately But It's Too Cheap Leakers Sell Only Predictum in $50 (Mostly) But We Provide 35+ Channels Including Predictum In Just $50.
Remember Predictum Never Offers Lifetime.
If Someone Offers Predictum Lifetime Then It's Scammer Cause No One Can Provide LIfetime as Their Costs is Too High. #StaySafe
Please Read This To Avoid Predictum Scams On Telegram
Guys Remember, Predictum Don't Offer Lifetime and Their Yearly Fees is 0.29 BTC So Stay Safe, Don't Give A Single Penny To Scammer [Say That You Want to buy lifetime and if the scammer says back that okay pay me for lifetime then it's scammer] By @VIPLeaksClub
Join Now, Don't Miss The Ride 😎
We Offer Cornix With Predictum Signals 🔥
Join @VIPLeaksClub For Trial Signals
I Will Share Paid Signal From Predictum Like This For Free (Soon) Unmute The Channel 👇
Also Predictum Original Yearly Price is 29 BTC And They Don't Offer Lifetime So Don't Get Scammed
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @predictumvipfree. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PREDICTŪM LEAKS” (@predictumvipfree), 127 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/predictumvipfree.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.