Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✨SEO Журнал PR-CY ️

@prcynews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,804subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001090145725
TypeChannel
Username@prcynews
DescriptionСоветы по SEO, промпты, кейсы и инструменты — с ИИ и не только. 📊 Проверить сайт онлайн — https://pr-cy.ru/analysis/ 💊 Поддержка — http://pr-cy.ru/support/new 💬 Чат веб-мастеров — @prcyru
Created8 November 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prcynews

Growth

4,7974,8044,800.56 August 2026 — 4,797 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,797 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,799 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,804 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,796–4,805 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:084,804+5
6 Aug 2026, 09:504,799+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:504,797no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:484,797first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.90%
avg views ÷ 4,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
428
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (31 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total9,833
Reactions total155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,710
Videos
245
Links
4,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4634.8%
3425.8%
🔥3325.0%
😁107.58%
💯64.55%
👀10.758%
👎10.758%
🤩10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prcynews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC214 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Как сделать полностраничный скриншот Улучшили работу нашего инструмент для создания полностраничных скриншотов. ⚡ Он снимает страницу целиком: прокручивает ее до конца и ждет загрузки "ленивых" изображений. Вы получаете один длинный скриншот всей страницы — без расширений, ручной прокрутки и склейки картинок.☝ Сделать скриншот 🔗 https://pr-cy.ru/screenshot/ ___ @prcynews

👍31🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC285 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⭐️ Как продвигать бренд в поиске и ответах нейросетей Google, Яндекс и нейросети должны связать в одну сущность ваш бренд, сайт, продукты, услуги, сотрудников и упоминания на других площадках. Если данные разбросаны по сети или противоречат друг другу, алгоритмам сложнее понять, кто вы и чем занимаетесь. Это может влиять и на обычную выдачу, и на рекомендации в ИИ-поиске. Для этого используют Entity SEO — продвиже

🔥21👍1

10 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC339 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Соберите страницу в чате и вернитесь к ней в один клик Теперь Артефакты в Вайбкодинге связаны с чатами. Если нужно продолжить работу над страницей, не придется искать нужный диалог: откройте Артефакт и сразу перейдите в чат, где его создавали и редактировали. Страница, история правок и контекст работы — в одном месте. Попробовать 🔗 https://pr-cy.ru/vibe/chat/ ___ @prcynews

1👍1🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC367 views9 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️Делайте страницы «Лучший [товар] до 10 000 ₽» Аудитория все чаще просит ИИ подобрать товар сразу в рамках бюджета. В исследовании более 400 млн промптов и около 8 тыс. диалогов о покупках. В 24,78% запросов цена указана уже в начале: «ноутбук до $1000», «телефон до $200», «дешевый вариант». Есть еще один интересный момент: если бюджет задан сразу, ИИ приходит к выбору в среднем за 16 шагов вместо 26 — на 39% быс

👍4🔥3💯2

9 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC390 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Готовый промпт для обложек и фонов Оригинальные обложки к статьям дадут плюс к узнаваемости, если все их генерировать в одном стиле. Не одинаковыми, а в одной рисовке и с одним уровнем яркости. Делайте их через Nano Banana Pro 🔗 https://pr-cy.ru/ai-image-generator/ Мы сделали пример, где маленькие человечки взаимодействуют с большим предметом. Это универсальный шаблон для разных сфер: 💊 человечки-врачи слушают

👍31🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC385 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Правильный способ использовать ИИ 😉 Автор видео — russkih.ruslan ____ @prcynews

1👍1🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC418 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Вы же не проверяете сайт вручную каждый день? А проблемы могут появиться в любой момент. Сегодня закончился SSL, завтра новый сотрудник случайно закрыл страницы от индексации. Через неделю выяснилось, что сайт уже потерял часть трафика. Чем позже вы узнаете о такой ошибке, тем дороже обойдется ее исправление. Поэтому проще поручить рутину PR-CY. 🤝 Добавьте сайт в PR-CY — сервис сам следит за десятками важных

2👍1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC449 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Как использовать ИИ для SEO-статей без риска для сайта Короткая схема работы, которая помогает получать пользу от ИИ, а не просто генерировать текст, который никого не заинтересует. 1️⃣ Сначала определите интент и изучите выдачу. 2️⃣ Соберите фактуру: ключи, вопросы аудитории, данные, примеры и тезисы экспертов. 3️⃣ Используйте ИИ для подготовки черновика, а не готовой статьи. 4️⃣ Отредактируйте текст: уберит

1👍1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC420 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Как спарсить метатеги сразу у сотни страниц Когда анализируете выдачу, приходится переходить по каждой странице, копировать заголовки и смотреть, как конкуренты раскрывают тему. Это можно сделать за один запуск парсера. ⤵️ Вставьте список URL в парсер PR-CY — и получите таблицу с Title, Description, H1–H6 и другими метаданными сразу по всем страницам (до 100 URL). Дальше можно сравнить структуры вручную или от

👍21🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC442 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️Улучшаем очень темные фото Темнота в кадре, шум, провалы в цвете и недостаточная чёткость — частые проблемы, которые вполне реально сгладить и исправить с помощью одного хорошо продуманного промпта. 👍 Сильно осветли исходное изображение и выведи его из тёмной недоэкспозиции. Значительно подними яркость, экспозицию и детали в тенях так, чтобы изображение стало заметно светлее, чище и полностью читаемым даже в самы

5👍3🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC464 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Что будет, если опубликовать 2000 ИИ-статей? Автор эксперимента создал два новых сайта и автоматически опубликовал на каждом по 1000 статей, сгенерированных ИИ. Что произошло дальше: ❌ Первый сайт Google практически деиндексировал через 2 недели. ❌ Второй продержался около 3 месяцев, после чего его страницы тоже исчезли из поиска. Но есть интересная деталь. После выпадения из Google сайты продолжали получать ци

👍3🔥32

5 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC496 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Google наказывает не ИИ-контент, а плохой контент Часто можно услышать: «Google пессимизирует тексты, написанные ИИ». Исследование показывает более интересную картину. Вот несколько выводов: 📌 5,3% страниц в топ-3 полностью написаны ИИ. Значит, AI-контент сам по себе не мешает высоким позициям. 📌 82,2% страниц в топ-3 содержат менее 50% ИИ-контента. Чаще всего нейросети используют как помощника, а не как автор

3👍3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @prcynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 56,951 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨SEO Журнал PR-CY ️” (@prcynews), 4,804 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prcynews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.