Channel

Официальный PR-аккаунт CPA BRO

@prbro_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

42subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003778214701
Type	Channel
Username	@prbro_official
Description	Предоставляем официальные ответы на слухи о нас, но только на самые интересные. Каждый день отбиваемся от папарацци. Любим скандалы, основанные на фактах, и развеиваем мифы
Created	29 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	10 August 2026
Last confirmed live	10 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/prbro_official

Growth

2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
10 Aug 2026, 17:16	42	no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:31	42	first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos: 1
Links: 1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
custom 5217711238242407084	35	25.2%
custom 5215481561805263295	33	23.7%
custom 5217444194355813918	27	19.4%
custom 5217677939360961879	16	11.5%
custom 5215282490071093500	15	10.8%
custom 5217558629464444882	9	6.47%
custom 5215276468526945785	4	2.88%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 16 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Feb 2026, 13:32 UTC170 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

RESEARCH — это отраслевое исследование, созданное для системного анализа ключевых процессов и вызовов iGaming-индустрии. Это не обзор трендов и не формальный отчёт. Это системная работа с реальными кейсами и практикой компаний, которые ежедневно принимают стратегические решения и формируют рынок. Проект является логичным продолжением миссии IGAMING INSIDER: быть инсайдером для рынка, предоставлять проверенную информ…

custom 52176779393609618795custom 52152764685269457854custom 52152824900710935003custom 52177112382424070841

16 Feb 2026, 13:32 UTC188 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

RESEARCH — это не разовая активность, а инструмент системного развития индустрии. С начала запуска проекта мы уже получаем качественный отклик от лидеров рынка, готовых делиться опытом и формировать будущее отрасли совместно. Команда понимает, что проект требует высокой ответственности, и сосредоточена на корректной реализации каждого этапа — от сбора данных до публикации финального отчёта. Если вы хотите быть не на…

custom 52174441943558139187custom 52154815618052632954custom 52176779393609618794

16 Feb 2026, 13:25 UTC173 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Команда IG получила действительно большое количество вопросов о проекте RESEARCH Обсуждения появились в публичных аккаунтах представителей индустрии, в профессиональных чатах, в комментариях — и, что показательно, в личных сообщениях. Это ожидаемо. Проект масштабный, и рынок реагирует на него активно. Поэтому считаем правильным подробно объяснить, что именно мы делаем и зачем. Отдельную волну обсуждений вызвало выс…

custom 52176779393609618797custom 52152824900710935005custom 52177112382424070845

12 Feb 2026, 10:48 UTC252 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Репутация строится на красивых словах о «силе духа», или на умении держать слово?🫀 Наиль, доброго дня и здравия! Давай по‑честному — без обид и лишних эмоций. Только факты, которые ты предпочитаешь подправлять под свой нарратив. Думали, что договорились с тобой по окончанию трудового договора в рамках рабочих взаимоотношений. Пожали руки и согласовали не портить информационное поле слухами. Ты настаивал на том, чт…

custom 521771123824240708410custom 52152824900710935007custom 52154815618052632954custom 52175586294644448823custom 52174441943558139181

11 Feb 2026, 20:17 UTC206 views69 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Накидайте 50 бибизьян и будет дроп полной версии комментария 🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊🙊

custom 521548156180526329525custom 521744419435581391819custom 521771123824240708419custom 52175586294644448826

11 Feb 2026, 20:13 UTC160 viewsread 10 August 2026

Forwarded from @adultmodusPhoto

Почему я больше не верю в «бро фитнес» Уже целую неделю рынок гудит новостями обо мне и проекте Bropower. Новом челендже и "сошедшем на берег капитане корабля". Позволю и я себе несколько строк общего информационного поля. Я много лет в арбитраже и за это время понял одну простую вещь: рынок человека ломает не деньгами и не конкуренцией. Он ломает изнутри. Выгоранием, хаосом, отсутствием опоры и дисциплины. Можно з…

29 Jan 2026, 10:28 UTCviews —

Channel created

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @prbro_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,219,576 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Режим взрослого
@adultmodus · 9431 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

CPA BORODA
@cpaboroda · 3251 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Режим взрослого
@adultmodus · 9431 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Официальный PR-аккаунт CPA BRO” (@prbro_official), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prbro_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.