Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Право для всех!

@pravoros

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

273subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001893644439
TypeChannel
Username@pravoros
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pravoros

Growth

2737 Aug 2026, 04:31 — 273 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:18 — 273 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:317 Aug 2026, 18:18
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 272–274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 18:18273no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:31273first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 19 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.3%
avg views ÷ 273 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held13 (19 February 20261 August 2026)
Views total171
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1935.8%
1528.3%
🤔611.3%
🤝47.55%
💯35.66%
👌23.77%
👏23.77%
😱11.89%
🤬11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pravoros. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 February 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👨‍🚒 ИИ компании уничтожают миллионы книг Сюжет антиутопии «451 градус по Фаренгейту» наступил. Anthropic покупает бумажные книги, с помощью роботизированных устройств срезает им корешки, сканирует и уничтожает оригиналы, чтобы обучать нейросеть Claude. Этим же занимаются и другие компании. По данным судебных документов таким образом были обработаны миллионы книг. Причиной такой технологии послужило решение суда США

1🤬1😱1

25 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC107 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚖ Прецедентное право в России? Госдума РФ приняла законопроект Верховного суда РФ, который укрепляет вертикаль судебной власти. В статью 5 ФКЗ «О Верховном суде Российской Федерации» вносится уточнение, что пленумы и обзоры ВС РФ становятся «руководящими» для судов России. Также добавлен пункт, что Пленум ВС РФ заслушивает доклады председателей кассационных, апелляционных, краевых, областных судов по вопросам учета

👍2💯21

11 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC128 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚖ Тематический обзор ВС о сделках с недвижимостью 1 июля 2026 года вышел тематический обзор № 15А/2026 Верховного Суда о сделках с жилыми помещениями. Напомню, что пленумы и обзоры ВС РФ становятся "руководящими" для судов России. 1. Первый же пункт касается дела Долиной - Лурье. Заблуждение относительно мотивов сделки не является достаточно существенным для признания сделки недействительной по ст.178 ГК РФ. Судам

1🤝1

4 Jul 2026, 11:27 UTC112 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ Порядок обжалования по Кодексу административного судопроизводства. В отличие от ГПК срок на кассационное обжалование больше в 2 раза - 6 месяцев. Судебные приказы мировых судей не обжалуются в апелляционной инстанции, т.к. вступают в силу сразу. #Судебная_практика@pravoros

2

14 May 2026, 06:01 UTC197 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ Порядок обжалования решений в судах общей юрисдикции Предыдущий порядок обжалования можно посмотреть здесь. #Судебная_практика@pravoros

👍3👏2

14 May 2026, 06:01 UTC178 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚖️ Откат реформы обжалования решений мировых судов 10.05.2026г. вступили в силу поправки об изменении порядка обжалования решений мировых судов. В ГПК РФ добавлена глава 40.1. Кассационные жалобы на судебные акты мировых судов после апелляционного обжалования могут быть поданы в Президиумы судов субъектов РФ (до поправок в кассационные суды). Кассационная жалоба передается или не передается на рассмотрение Президиум

2🤔2

30 Apr 2026, 07:29 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📱 Есть ли жизнь после блокировки WhatsApp и Telegram? Илон Маск выпустил мессенджер XChat. Его называют конкурентом Telegram. Региcтрация возможна через соцсеть X. Приложение для Android появится позже. Заявлено в мессенджере: ▪️Переписки со сквозным шифрованием ▪️Удаление сообщений по желанию и по таймеру ▪️Голосовые и видеозвонки между устройствами ▪️Встроенный Grok прямо в чате ▪️Запрет на скриншоты и запись ваш

👍1

11 Apr 2026, 07:05 UTC215 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💰 Новый платежный сервис от UnionPay UnionPay выпустило приложение Nihao China — мобильный сервис для иностранных туристов в Китае. Приложение работает с UnionPay, Alipay и WeChat Pay, позволяя оплачивать покупки, транспорт и услуги без локальных (китайских) кошельков. Кстати, интересно, судились ли китайские компании друг с другом из-за слова Pay в знаках обслуживания? 😀 Comet отвечает, что судебных споров именно

👍42👌1

4 Apr 2026, 07:04 UTC168 views3 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤪 Продолжение истории про платежи QR История с PayQR наглядно демонстрирует, как работает интеллектуальное право в России. ООО "Фит" попыталось "проработать" ключевой для себя вопрос: все таки PayQR - это общеизвестный бренд или нет? Для этого их юрист придумал "гениальную" схему - подать заявление в суд об установлении юридического факта. Проще говоря, попытался "узаконить" судебным актом то, что зарегистрировал Р

🤔2👌1

29 Mar 2026, 07:00 UTC148 views7 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

🤪 Патентный тролль против Сбербанка Для начала упомяну, что "патентный троллинг" - системная проблема российского интеллектуального права. Корни этой проблемы уходят в далекий 2004г., когда был создан Роспатент, а затем началась компания по борьбе с пиратством (поскольку интеллектуальные права традиционно игнорировались в стране и надо было что-то предпринимать). Роспатент начал активно регистрировать все подряд, бе

👍5🤔2

8 Mar 2026, 08:44 UTC163 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌷 Дорогие подписчицы, прекрасные дамы! Поздравляю вас с 8 Марта! Пусть в вашей жизни не будет «объектов преступлений», а будут только объекты любви и заботы. Домашние споры решаются досудебно — «потому что я так хочу, дорогой». А ваши вторые половины всегда соблюдают условия «брачного контракта» любви и верности.

5

28 Feb 2026, 07:03 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚖️ Как бороться с процессуальными нарушениями в суде Во-первых, имейте ввиду, что сотрудничество почти всегда продуктивнее противостояния! Задача адвоката в целом состоит в том, чтобы помочь суду разобраться в правоте вашего доверителя, а не спорить с судьей 😉 Но иногда, процессуальные права доверителя настолько ущемляются, что перспектива дела становится негативной. Как говорится: «Не стоит принимать доброту за с

👍3💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @pravoros. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 962,879 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Право для всех!” (@pravoros), 273 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pravoros.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.