Channel
@praefixmodern
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
355subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001145996956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @praefixmodern |
| Created | 22 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/praefixmodern |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 355 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 354 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 354 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 7 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
56 reactions across 8 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 48.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 8.93% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.57% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.57% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.79% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 26 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мы тут выставку открываем! завтра на открытии сыграю вместе с лайвкодером Trophallaxis сет, где партитуры будут генерировать исторические шифровальные алгоритмы. А сама выставка — такая переплетающаяся коса из истории цифровизации, кибербезопасности и хакеров — как они друг за другом поспевали, друг друга подстегивали и развивали. в исторической части — куча интересных экспонатов, в том числе мои детские игрушки, взл…
❤5❤🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3👌1💯1
Манифест техно-шаманизма Техно-шаманизм утверждает: технологии не являются ни нейтральными инструментами, ни автономными силами, управляющими человеком. Они представляют собой среду порождения смыслов, в которой человеческое и нечеловеческое вступают в со-присутствие. Техно-шаман — тот, кто работает в этой среде как посредник, удерживая видимость границ между субъектом и устройством, но не принимая их как окончательн…
❤🔥2
В своей рубрике в канале Музея криптографии написал о самом жутком совпадении художественного сюжета и реальной кибератаки, с которым я сталкивался
❤🔥6👍1🔥1🥰1
Кибератака, предвосхитившая научную фантастику 👾 Надеемся, что вы тоже соскучились по нашей рубрике #криптокино. Сегодня мы начинаем серию специальных постов, посвященных кибербезопасности: вирусы, хакеры, цифровое пространство. Исследователь музея Егор Ефремов рассказывает о сериале «Задача трех тел» [экранизации одноименного романа Лю Цысиня] и подозрительно похожей на сюжет романа кибератаке fast16, разработанну…
❤3❤🔥1🔥1🤔1🥰1
Выложил на сигму моё мультимодальное интервью Новые измерения чувственности и мультимодальный эрос: биоэтический аспект из журнала Медицинская антропология и биоэтика с Psevdo и Мартой Де-Марко, пользовательницами больших языковых моделей (LLM), которые выстраивают романтические и эротические отношения с ИИ-компаньонами. Респондентки рассказывают о своём опыте взаимодействия с различными чатботами (ChatGPT, DeepSeek,…
🥴1😁1😱1
Современный ИИ это эхо постмодернизма как философской системы. Я - ии-пессимист, как мы уже выяснили. И одна из вещей, которая вызывает у меня сомнение (и таких персонажей, как, например, Ян Ле Кун) - это фиксация на языковых моделях как на универсальном ответе на все проблемы. Это как если бы мы продолжали на все задачи тренировать модель визуальной коры кошки, с которой все начиналось. Язык это тонкая надстройка на…
❤8🔥2🌭1😁1
Тут яндекс.музыка, видимо, в автоматическом режиме навесила 18+ и спрятала слова у нашей с Katapygon песни на стихи Волошина ("и припав к родному полю, все ли травки проросли..."). Но в этом ничего нового и интересного нет, а вот интересно мне было, что же произошло 1 августа 1990 г — время, от которого отсчитывается эпоха, которую теперь цензурируют по новому закону. Оказалось, что с этого дня вступил в силу Закон …
❤8👌2👏1🔥1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @praefixmodern. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,145,698 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пост-своевременность” (@praefixmodern), 355 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/praefixmodern.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.