Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π±Ρ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΠΊ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ±Π΅. ΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΊ
π3

Channel
@practsntry
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
92subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003607765963 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @practsntry |
| Description | Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»ΠΎ :: 12.03.26 _______________________ Π‘ΡΠ°ΠΆ π,π Π»Π΅Ρ !! |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 5 May 2026β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/practsntry |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 92 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 92 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
84 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π― | 24 | 28.6% | |
| customΒ 5208771547283620437 | 9 | 10.7% | |
| π | 9 | 10.7% | |
| customΒ 5229092828562365990 | 5 | 5.95% | |
| customΒ 5260335812242863731 | 5 | 5.95% | |
| customΒ 5460645381756970005 | 5 | 5.95% | |
| customΒ 5453870143861974611 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| customΒ 5454119986404562318 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| customΒ 5458806371250105072 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| π | 4 | 4.76% | |
| customΒ 5260745006662055707 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| customΒ 5260319757655109833 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| customΒ 5260586646922886778 | 2 | 2.38% | |
| π | 2 | 2.38% | |
| customΒ 5461060378676980314 | 1 | 1.19% | |
| customΒ 5461132924969575306 | 1 | 1.19% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramβs.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π±Ρ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΎ Π² ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΠΊ Π½Π° ΡΡΡΠ±Π΅. ΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΊ
π3
γ €γ €γ €πππ πΎππππΌπ½ γ €γ €γ €γ €γ €γ € γ €((πβ)) π πͺπ‘ππ πππππΌ & ..πΌπππΌ.. γ €κ±π ππππππππ ππππππOΒΊ γ €γ €γ €γ €((meaw & meaw)) γ €ΡΡΠΊΠ½ΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΌΡΠ²,ΡΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΡΡ γ €γ €γ €ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° γ €γ € κ·κ₯κ·α₯«α‘ π£ ΰ£ͺΛ . ΦΊ ΦΈ Φβκ·κ₯κ·
π―5π3π2π1
.. & π»π ππΎ πΌππ ππ . ππΎπΊππ ππΎπ ππΊπ»ππ πππ . . .β’ βΊ βΊ #prcts. βΊ βΊ #bannr. @Importantl_bot **
π―4π2π1π1
.. & π π πππ½πΎπ πΊππ½ . πππππππ πππΎπΌππΊπ . . .β’ βΊ βΊ #ord. βΊ βΊ #bannr. @Importantl_bot **
π―3π1
ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ·Π°ΠΉΠ½ Π²ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ
.. & ππΎπ ππΎπ½πΎππππ . ππΎπ ππππππππ . . .β’ βΊ βΊ #prcts. βΊ βΊ #bannr. @Importantl_bot **
π―5π1
. 'πΏππ πππΊπππππ &from asha. . βΊ βΊ #prcts. βΊ βΊ #bannr. @Importantl_bot **
π―1
.. & πΏππππ πΎππΎπππ . ππππ π¦πΊπππΎππ»πΎπ π . . .β’ βΊ βΊ #prcts. βΊ βΊ #bannr. @Importantl_bot **
π―6
.. & ππΎ ππΊππ ππ ππΎπ ππππΎ . πππΊπ πΊπππππππ . . .β’ βΊ βΊ #prcts. βΊ βΊ #bannr. @Importantl_bot **
customΒ 54541199864045623182customΒ 52087715472836204371customΒ 54588063712501050721
.. & Desperation gives . people a strange vibe . . .β’ βΊ βΊ #prcts. βΊ βΊ #bannr. @Importantl_bot **
customΒ 54538701438619746112customΒ 52087715472836204371customΒ 54588063712501050721
.. & ππΊππππΎ ππ ππππππΊπ π π π»πΎπΊππππΏππ πππ½πΊπ . . .β’ βΊ βΊ #prcts. βΊ βΊ #bannr. @Importantl_bot **
customΒ 52087715472836204372customΒ 54541199864045623181customΒ 54588063712501050721
Ρ Π΅ Ρ Ρ ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ , ΡΡΠ° ΡΡΠ° Π·Π°ΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ
customΒ 54538701438619746112customΒ 52087715472836204371customΒ 54541199864045623181
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @practsntry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 883,070 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
β..π ππ§π..β (@practsntry), 92 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/practsntry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.