Started a GLD long looking for previous highs. shorted qqq.

Channel
pplog
@pplogg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
89subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003046670119 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pplogg |
| Description | Pp’s personal trading logs and rants |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pplogg |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 89 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 89 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 210
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 156
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://open.substack.com/pub/fidenza/p/anatomy-of-a-recession-102?r=6w0iub&utm_medium=ios
Heavily flattened, stopped out on lots of my shorts that got squeezed ytd gave back q a bit 😭. Currently only holding XOM and agro and a small cvna put, not really rushing into any pos atm, maybe short some qqq at ndx 24k.
Stopped out of my eth short with saylor mooning strc. Added some xom just now
❤1
Kinda just positioning for a turkey scenario for the shorts in mind. Else slightly negative delta with the positioning. Getting a bit uncomfortable w the sizing tbvh too given the headlines and uncertainty recently, will look to free up more cash in the coming days going later into the war, haven’t been too focused on trading lately so really no edge here
Current positioning updates, didn’t do much, been busy away lately.
Tped CVX here to free up some cash still holding XOM atm
❤1
https://x.com/saylor/status/2038646796805632330?s=20 Not sure i like what saylor is doing for BTC here. I took a stab short on ETH at 2040 w tight stops at 2053 to sleep just hoping asian sess will continue to weaken but am alright to be stopped out
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Sad really should’ve just continued shorting crypto everytime
https://x.com/kobeissiletter/status/2037524287788327358?s=46
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pplogg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 162,401 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@wealthwinds · 1485 posts𝙧𝙚𝙫𝙞𝙚𝙬𝙨 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙢𝙤𝙣𝙚𝙮// работа отзывы
@reveuvmoney · 1323 postsbelieve in yourself-заработок на отзывах
@believeinyourself81 · 122 postsBUFF MONEY | Заработок на отзывах💰
@buffmoney1 · 1152 posts🪼ОТЗЫВЫ/ЗАРАБОТОК/money
@d_enge · 521 post🧡𝙉𝘼𝙈𝙄🕷 | Заработок на отзывах 🔗💸
@Nami_zarabotok · 891 post~beautiful life~деньги за задания~
@otziwiiii · 2181 postэльхан лох
@zarabotok_na_otzivaxx · 1191 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“pplog” (@pplogg), 89 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pplogg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.