Voice message, posted without a caption

Channel
ПП десерты с Мари Федоровой | КЕЙКО
@pp_konditer_mari
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,032subscribers
-86 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001694077491 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pp_konditer_mari |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pp_konditer_mari |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 12,032 | -5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 12,037 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 12,030 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:27 | 12,036 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 12,042 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 12,045 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 12,046 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 12,050 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 12,051 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:59 | 12,052 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 12,053 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 12,056 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 12,054 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 12,047 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 12,054 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 12,056 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 12,066 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 12,068 | -8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 12,076 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 12,085 | first reading |
Engagement
106 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.70%
- avg views ÷ 12,032 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 325
- 88 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.08%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 89
- of 106 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 69 of 88 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 106 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 28,563 |
| Reactions total | 468 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 23:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 8m 56s
- Average length
- 1m 07s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
570 reactions across 84 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 237 | 41.6% | |
| 🔥 | 161 | 28.2% | |
| 👍 | 130 | 22.8% | |
| 😍 | 10 | 1.75% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 1.58% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 0.877% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.702% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.526% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.351% | |
| 🙊 | 2 | 0.351% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.351% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.351% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.351% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.175% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 106 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 570 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Вот таким ферментом пользуюсь я👇🏼 https://ozon.kz/t/4KiNRe7 🥛Как использовать: Добавить в молочный продукт из расчета 2,5мл фермента на 1 литр молочного продукта. Оставить в холодильнике на 24 часа, затем использовать. 24 часа необходимо дать ферменту на расщепление лактозы - чтобы произошла реакция.
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤2
Друзья, недавно видела в комментариях вопрос о том, как использовать фермент лактазу для создания безлактозных десертов? Хотела его репостнуть сюда, но потеряла. Тем не менее, давайте расскажу вам, как пользоваться этим ферментом и для чего он нужен 🙌🏼
Давайте я вас отвлеку своими приключениями🙂 Я сегодня возвращаюсь в Астану. На кружочке улыбаюсь, а на самом деле очень грустно было улетать💔
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
🍂🔔С Днём знаний! Как вы сегодня? В первосентябрьской суете или вас не затронуло? Я вот радуюсь, что мне снова не надо в школу 😂 смакую этот день каждый год! Ахаха
😁5❤1
Теперь, разберем подробнее структурообразователи для теста 🥐 ✔️ПСИЛЛИУМ Это клетчатка, которая в безглютеновом тесте работает за счёт образования геля, который частично заменяет функцию глютена. 👩🏻🍳Как использовать: В некоторых рецептах вы найдете такую технологию: насыпьте прямо в тесто, или добавьте к муке, но ЧАЩЕ ВСЕГО псиллиум предварительно замачивают и оставляют на 5-10 минут, чтобы образовался гель. На 1г …
❤9
Как сделать так, чтобы безглютеновое тесто не рвалось?🤔 Тесту без глютена не хватает структуры, поэтому оно крошится, ломается и рвется. Чтобы сделать его эластичнее, нам нужно двигаться в нескольких направлениях: 1. Добавить структурообразователь: •псиллиум - идеально для хлеба, булочек, пиццы •ксантановая камедь - идеально для теста на вареники и пельмени •гуаровая камедь - дает слизистую текстуру тесту. 2. Дать…
❤7
Причина #2 Кофе заменяет завтрак Если человек выпил эспрессо натощак, а через час нормально позавтракал — никакого особого механизма превращения тела в skinny fat нет. А вот если кофе становится заменой завтрака, особенно на фоне похудения, силовых тренировок и хронического недоедания, мышцам может не хватать: • энергии; • белка; • регулярного поступления аминокислот. Тогда при снижении веса можно потерять не тол…
❤4
Причина #1 Кофеин повышает кортизол И речь именно о кофеине натощак утром! Когда мы просыпаемся - у нас уже достаточно высокий уровень кортизола, который постепенно снижается. Выпивая чашку кофе до завтрака вы повышаете и без того высокий кортизол. Конечно, сказать что чашка кофе натощак напрямую приводит к фигуре skinny fat - значит, притянуть за уши 😅 Разумеется, не только в кофе дело, но именно привычка так пить…
❤5
Знаете таких людей - вроде худая, но тело дряблое, и 🍑 висит? Такая фигура называется «skinny fat», что переводится как «худой толстый». У таких людей нет лишнего веса и просто похудеть им не поможет. Потому что проблема не в весе! ☕️Кофе натощак не прямо, но косвенно приводит к такой фигуре. Это когда вместо завтрака, или перед ним вы выпиваете чашечку кофе. Сейчас расскажу, как именно это влияет👇🏼
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 106 posts we hold for @pp_konditer_mari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@pp_konditer_mari edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 22 August 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выбираем тему контента на понедельник
- Как сделать пп тесто эластичным, чтобы оно не рвалось?49%
- Что на самом деле означает «без сахара» на упаковке?11%
- Разбор сахарозаменителей (предлагайте свои в комментариях)16%
- Что бы я никогда не стала продавать клиенту, как кондитер?35%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Выбираем тему на понедельник
- Что не так с составом сегодняшнего шоколада?32%
- Где кондитеру искать клиентов?45%
- Почему кофе на тощак ведет к фигуре скинни фэт?39%
- Как читать составы на этикетках?10%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@zefirzvet · 43,971
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
@ex_pastry_cook1 · 34,476
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
@velvet_alina · 63,897
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 August 2026
@nadejda_kolomeytseva · 33,289
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@ihatecakes · 43,341
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 28 August 2026
@sitiy_muzh · 62,504
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 August 2026
@alina2cakeschool · 33,441
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
@vip_tape · 30,397
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 September 2026
@alenazefirka · 30,062
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
@cake_school · 115,867
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
@re_ci_pe · 72,351
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
@olga_lovecake · 85,836
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
@avokado_xudeet · 95,814
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
@kondi_school · 41,793
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@art2cake · 67,579
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
@bkzames · 35,353
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПП десерты с Мари Федоровой | КЕЙКО” (@pp_konditer_mari), 12,032 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pp_konditer_mari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.