Channel
@pp5_agency
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
59subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002183976398 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pp5_agency |
| Description | 🕯Микро-агентство сумасшедших идей для арткультпросвет-мероприятий и выставок в Петербурге без постоянного места укоренения. 🗝 анонсы в канале 🌚 тот же ник в инсте 🔮 по любым вопросам @KetiGy 🎨 фон авы — картина британского художника DD McInn |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pp5_agency |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 59 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 59 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 21 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 57.6% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 28.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔹 OPEN CALL продолжается... 🔹 ...мы собираем иллюстрации для зина «Сновидцы»! *чб эскиз на последнем фото — художницы @yuliachebyk 🌿 прошло уже пара домашних встреч, пришли как художники, так и не рисующие регулярно, и у нас, кажется, получается! Первые результаты на фото 🌿 в проектах я опираюсь на планирование и теорию, но практика и случай диктуют свои правила, и наши продиктовали: делаем печатную графику акрилом…
❤2🔥1
А что дальше... 🌚 Говорила ранее, что из-за жития жизни поставила лимит: до 2-3 выставок/мероприятий в год, и, пусть в итоге даже с таким лимитом я ощущаю себя как лягушка из басни про лягушку и вола, постараюсь в рамках года осуществить что-то из следующего: 🤩 прогулка-перфоманс с чтением стихов и прочим в парке среди петербуржских дворцов 🤩 персональная выставка-квартирник на моей территории, дома, то бишь 🤩 …
❤2🔥2
OPEN CALL ⏮Упс! У меня случился коллапс, вывалился отложенный черновик. Ну что ж, все мы люди, давайте еще раз 🙂⏭ Привет, посетитель! Начало года выдалось непростым, но неизбежно настало пять пополудни ☕️ и я готова рассказать о дальнейших планах и дать новый анонс. 🈁🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤ℹ️ набор писателей и художников тех, кто видит сны, на создание зина* снов с текстами (малая форма) и иллюстрациями, которые мы сделаем сами…
❤4🔥3👍2
☕️ Онлайн-дискуссия с художниками Дорогие посетители, после долгого перерыва вернулась к обработке видео с «Без никого» и нашего сентябрьского созвона с художниками. Что мы обсудили: ▶️ конечно, ответили на главный вопрос проекта «Если искусство висит в лесу, и некому его увидеть, несет ли оно ценность?» а еще выяснили, поменялось ли наше первоначальное мнение после обсуждения — один из важнейших моментов дискуссий…
❤8🔥4👍1
Большой паук быстро сплел сеть меж двух сосен, своим размером пугая проплывающих мимо чаек, рыбаков и туристов. Когда паук присел на паутину, он ожил и начал плясать на ветру... 🕸🕷🕸 Настало-таки пять пополудни, и видео с паучьим перфомансом (назвать это перфомансом, на самом деле, мне довольно сложно — паук был сплетен заранее, потому что занял непредвиденно много часов, а погода рядом с Ладогой переменчива; да и н…
❤5🔥3👍2
☁️ О работах В двух постах (это второй) рассказываю о работах на выставке «Без никого». Первый пост о работах «Паук» Кэти Джулаева Макраме: джут. Паук быстро сплел свою сеть меж двух сосен, своим размером пугая проплывающих мимо чаек, рыбаков и туристов. Когда паук присел на паутину, обнаружился неожиданный, но очень естественный эффект — он начал "жить" и плясать на ветру; это я еще покажу на видео. Кто знает, мо…
❤8👍2🔥2
☁️ О работах В двух постах рассказываю о работах на выставке «Без никого». На этой неделе мы с писательницей, о которой я тоже еще расскажу, запишем аудиокусочки для фона, и затем я смонтирую несколько видео (о выставке, о подготовке, а также перфоманс-вязание паука). «Медведь-пестун» Оля Гендель Керамика, деревянная рамка. Портрет медведя «медведь-пестун». 🤍 Медведя-подростка примостили на небольшой сосенке, он …
❤5🔥2🦄1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @pp5_agency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,417,329 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pp5_agency named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пять пополудни” (@pp5_agency), 59 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pp5_agency.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.