Channel
@pozor_krd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
450subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002001367009 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pozor_krd |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pozor_krd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 450 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 453 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 453 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
104 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 54 | 51.9% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 13.5% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 13.5% | |
| 😡 | 7 | 6.73% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 4.81% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.85% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.88% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.92% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.962% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Паркуюсь как олень» или хроники из мира автомобилистов, которые не знают о существовании общественного транспорта и запрещающих знаков. Улица Казаджиева от Нарыкова до детского садика и реверс вместо двух полос 🤦♂️ Водители автобусов уже устали протискиваться и поджиматься. Но кого это волнует? Подпишись на канал
❤2🤬2😡2💯1
Надо ли убирать какахи за собаками?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Пост в одном из пабликов натолкнул на мысль: должны до собаководы убирать 💩 за своими шерстяными или само растворится в траве газона? Что думает общественность?
Наша любимая рубрика "Я мудак, засераю город"
💯1🔥1
И снова о тех, кто уродует город На декабрьской прямой линии губернатор говорил о том, что надо бороться с расклейщиками объявлений. Потому что это бельмо не только на глазу - на лице города! Именно они гадят в городе, завешивают стены зданий и столбы уродливыми бумажками. И самое поганое - не только делают это без зазрения совести, но ещё и отрабатывают пайку. Так вот, товарищ губернатор, вот вам парочка таких гор…
❤1👍1💯1
Когда наш админ видит таких людей, у него только пара пожеланий: чтобы у этих людей отсохли руки и они не могли бы больше клеить объявления на столбы, и чтобы отсохли ноги, чтобы они больше не могли ходить и загаживать город. Ну а кто мы такие, чтобы спорить с админом в этом случае. Потому что столбы, деревья, остановки и все такое - тоже лицо города. А вот такие расклейщики - паразиты на его теле. Подпишись на кан…
❤1💯1
А что, есть люди, которые без машин и ходят пешком? Вероятно, именно так думал водитель этого Ниссана, когда ставил свою машину поперек тротуара у 31й школы. Или, что вероятнее, вообще ни о чем не думал (ибо особо нечем) Подписаться на канал здесь Прислать свое фото/видео - в описании
❤3🤬1
Всемирная паутина подкинула новое видео малолетних упырей (хотя само видео, видимо, уже не сильно свежее). Ну тут традиционно пожелание только одно: чтобы родители этих малолеток вот так же прочувствовали на себе воспитание таких вот деточек. Ну а сам вертухай чтобы на незапланированный шпагат присел после очередного прыжка. Вглядитесь в эти неодухотворенные лица - может это ваши соседи или знакомые, тогда можете вы…
🤬11
Video, posted without a caption
🤬8
Ну что, мамочки, кто ещё так делает? Кому ещё забрать своего дитятку посреди дороги норм, закрыв тем самым дорогу другим людям? Кто ещё считает, что челядь может и постоять/подождать? Велком в комментарии! Видео: типичный краснодар(ну это и так понятно)
🤬9
😧Подростки раскурочили остановку общественного транспорта на улице 1 Мая в Краснодаре! Проблемы в содеянном они не видят, наоборот, говорят, что они проверяют качество монтажа, чтобы во время ветра было безопасно.. 🤬 — немедленно их наказать! 📍Наш запрещеннограм 🤩 ЧП / Краснодар
🤬6
Отец года на улице Российской Видео: Костя таксист 😃ЧП Краснодара и края 🗒Предложить новость
🤬4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @pozor_krd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Надо ли убирать какахи за собаками?
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2025 to 5 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Доска позора. Краснодар” (@pozor_krd), 450 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pozor_krd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.