Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for поясни за маркетинг

Channel

поясни за маркетинг

@poyasni_za_marketing

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

259subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001244916472
TypeChannel
Username@poyasni_za_marketing
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/poyasni_za_marketing

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

256259257.57 August 2026 — 258 subscribers8 August 2026 — 258 subscribers14 August 2026 — 257 subscribers30 August 2026 — 256 subscribers8 September 2026 — 258 subscribers14 September 2026 — 259 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 256–259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 23:41259+1
8 Sept 2026, 01:38258+2
30 Aug 2026, 00:19256-1
14 Aug 2026, 00:25257-1
8 Aug 2026, 09:16258no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:11258first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 41s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

265 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 536196614160438414210640.0%
👏4717.7%
custom 54476532731902776193212.1%
custom 5458471711693362291186.79%
🤡176.42%
💯124.53%
🗿124.53%
custom 530319242185148128562.26%
🎉62.26%
👀62.26%
🤯31.13%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 265 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 05:42 UTC122 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как изменилось поведение пользователей тг в 2026 году? Если раньше из-за FOMO телегу открывали несколько раз в день, боясь упустить новость То сейчас появился JOMO (joy of missing out) - радость от избегания потока новостей Именно поэтому у вас большинство каналов стоит на мьюте Теперь подписчик читает: 🤷‍♀️ не тот канал, который недавно запостил 👍 а тот, к которому у него такая лояльность, что даже если канал на…

custom 536196614160438414218🤡4

25 May 2026, 06:59 UTC232 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Большинство каналов в телеге у вас на мьюте?

  1. Да, уведомления есть у пары каналов и друзей 🫤96%
  2. Нет, все уведомления включены😡2%
  3. Я уже в мессенджере Макс🤩7%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 May 2026, 14:51 UTC225 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Поясняю, как определить ботов в своем тг канале

custom 536196614160438414215🎉6💯4

12 May 2026, 10:41 UTC255 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Знаете, как в подписчиках своей телеги определить ботов?

  1. Да👆14%
  2. Нет🔭40%
  3. Расскажи😲71%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 May 2026, 15:04 UTC255 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Маркетинг хрупкого мужского эга? NASA переименовали размеры написечников: Small -> Large (большой) Medium -> Gigantic (гигантский) Large -> Humongous (охрененно огромный) Это чистый маркетинг: сам девайс не изменился, зато насколько более приятным стало ощущение от его использования👩‍🍳 Какой размер возьмёте себе: 🍉 - большой 👍 - гигантский 👏 - колоссально охрененно огромный

👏9🗿4custom 53619661416043841423💯1custom 54584717116933622911

6 May 2026, 15:28 UTC202 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Маме своей поТЫкай Брендам кажется, что переход на "ты" - это про сближение с аудиторией По факту это обычный стадный инстинкт: один дурак начал, остальные подхватили Почему дурак? Потому что в нашей культуре обращаться на "ты" к незнакомому человеку как минимум грубо, как максимум - вызывающе обычно одним махом на "ты" со мной переходит таксист, у которого воняет в машине ты че охуел, пёс А еще это тупо, потому …

💯7👏2custom 54584717116933622912

6 May 2026, 07:06 UTCviews —

поясни за маркетинг pinned «Вам ближе, когда бренды общаются на ВЫ или на ТЫ?»

6 May 2026, 07:06 UTC189 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Вам ближе, когда бренды общаются на ВЫ или на ТЫ?

  1. На ВЫ53%
  2. На ТЫ14%
  3. Все равно42%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 53619661416043841422

21 Feb 2026, 07:42 UTC427 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что значит уметь в ситуативный маркетинг? Если на этой неделе вы не рыдали над видео с Панчем, то у вас либо нет интернета, либо нет души Контекст: Начало истории душераздирающее - маленькую обезьянку жёстко избила взрослая, и она побежала к игрушечной из ΙΚΕΑ, чтобы та защитила ее Это игрушку ей дали смотрители зоопарка в качестве эмоциональной поддержки, потому что мама от нее отказалась В итоге там у них хэппи…

custom 536196614160438414218👏2

13 Feb 2026, 07:11 UTC357 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня я наткнулась на дурацкую статью, в которой анализировали, какую знаменитость больше всего гуглили после появления в рекламе супер боула Список такой: Mr Beast (ютубер, который разыгрывает бабки в челленджах) Бред Питт (в трейлере 2й части Однажды в Голивуде. Видимо, зумеры удивились, что дед еще снимается) Крис Хемсворт (ну тут, я считаю, заслуженно - в рекламе он боится, что умный дом его убьет) Только это…

👏5custom 53619661416043841422custom 54584717116933622912

10 Feb 2026, 07:02 UTC285 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Почему выступление Βad bunny на super bowl было эпохальным? И при чем тут маркетинг? Сначала посмотрите - оно ооооочень красиво сделано😍 Обычно в контексте супер боула мы следим за рекламой, и тем, как бренды соревнуются в креативе Но бренды зависят от настроения людей, и сегодня важно учитывать социо-культурный и политический контексты Контекст: Сейчас в США Трамп охотится за иммигрантами. Нам может показаться э…

👏11custom 54584717116933622914

14 Jan 2026, 15:19 UTC301 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Все маркетологи игнорируют ЭТУ ВЕЩЬ LEGO — вроде бы детский бренд, но сегодня взрослые приносят ему каждый четвёртый доллар Почему? Lego заметили, что взрослые покупают наборы для себя, а не детям Обычно в этой ситуации улучшают таргетирование, чтобы вернуть мотивацию взрослого в русло покупок для ребенка Но, когда ты хитренький, ты понимаешь, что на самом деле это не баг, в фича новый рынок — с другими мотиваци…

custom 536196614160438414212👀4👏3🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @poyasni_za_marketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 May 2026, 06:59 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

Большинство каналов в телеге у вас на мьюте?

  1. Да, уведомления есть у пары каналов и друзей 🫤96%
  2. Нет, все уведомления включены😡2%
  3. Я уже в мессенджере Макс🤩7%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 May 2026, 10:41 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

Знаете, как в подписчиках своей телеги определить ботов?

  1. Да👆14%
  2. Нет🔭40%
  3. Расскажи😲71%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 May 2026, 07:06 UTCAnonymous Poll57 voters

Вам ближе, когда бренды общаются на ВЫ или на ТЫ?

  1. На ВЫ53%
  2. На ТЫ14%
  3. Все равно42%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Jan 2026, 05:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz55 voters

Как вы думаете, каких тематических наборов LEGO больше всего?

  1. ⚡️Гарри Поттер22%
  2. 🦹‍♀️Marvel20%
  3. ✨️Disney7%
  4. 🦸‍♂️DC4%
  5. 🌌Звёздные Войны47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 2 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“поясни за маркетинг” (@poyasni_za_marketing), 259 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poyasni_za_marketing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.