Channel
@powerofanalyticsuzb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
89subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001683736123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @powerofanalyticsuzb |
| Description | Mamlakat va dunyoda sodir boʻlayotgan voqealar boʻyicha tahliliy penalti uramiz. Maqola yozishga erinchoqlik qilgan, lekin nimadir deging kelgan paytda. Muallif g'oyalari hukumat, fuqarolik jamiyati va folloverlar fikrlari bilan mos kelmasligi mumkin😈🤔 |
| Created | 12 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/powerofanalyticsuzb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 89 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 89 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
28 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 20 | 71.4% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 3.57% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2023 to 16 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
(3/3) Buyogʻiga nima qilish kerak? Birinchidan, shu yoki boshqa vaqtda davlatlar oʻrtasida yuzaga keladigan nizolardan qatʼi nazar, toʻliq tarkibda uchrashuv oʻtkazishda davom etish. Ikkinchidan, soʻzdan ishga oʻtish va nihoyat aniq loyihalarni ishga tushirish. Darvoqe, men Ipak yoʻli vizasi gʻoyasiga hali ham optimistik munosabatdaman va uni hokimiyatlar oʻz egosini qurbon qilishga tayyorligi, buning zarurati va ido…
(2/3) Nima yoqmadi? Albatta, hech kim mazkur uchrashuvdan olamshumul qarorlar kutmagandi. Markaziy Osiyoning o‘n yillik parchalanishi mintaqani o‘z taqdirini to‘laqonli mustaqil hal qila olmaydigan va asosiy tashqi o‘yinchilarning unga nisbatan qanday siyosat ishlab chiqishiga bog‘liq bo‘lgan vaziyatga olib keldi. Va koʻp jihatdan mintaqaning kelajagi oʻzining va qisman bizning mustaqilligimiz uchun kurashayotgan Ukr…
(1/3) Dushanbeda Markaziy Osiyo davlatlari🇰🇿🇰🇬🇭🇺🇹🇲🇺🇿 rahbarlarining 5-maslahat uchrashuvi bo‘lib o‘tdi. Bu — besh nafar amaldagi davlat rahbarlarining barchasi ishtirok etgan 2-maslahat uchrashuvi. Uchrashuv hech qanday sensatsiyalarsiz kechdi. Ishtirokchilar, odatdagidek, bir-birlari sharafiga maqtov yogʻdirish, doʻstlik va yaxshi qoʻshnichilik kafolatlari hamda Leopold mushuk uslubidagi boshqa bayonotlardan vaqtlar…
(3/3) Albatta, bizning postsovet siyosiy tizimlarimiz haqida gap ketganda, shuni tushunish kerakki, aksariyat davlatlar ijtimoiy-siyosiy hayotning adekvat tizimini barpo etish imkoniyatini 1990-yillardayoq boy berishgan. Va buning uchun javobgarlikning asosiy qismi aynan oʻsha, jamiyatlarning passiv boʻlishi uchun bor imkoniyatini ishga solgan, siyosiy elita gardaniga tushadi. Endi qandaydir manevrlar uchun kam imkon…
🔥1
(2/3) Jamiyatimiz uchun ham o‘z qadriyatlarini qayta ko‘rib chiqish vaqti keldi. Farzandlarning ta’lim olishiga qilinadigan sarf-xarajatlar «qo‘shnilar havas qiladigan» to‘y o‘tkazish uchun pul yigʻishdan ko‘ra ustuvorroq boʻlishi lozim. Insonning shaxsiyatini qoʻllab-quvvatlash barchani yagona qolip va meʼyorlarga solishga intilishdan koʻra ustuvorroq boʻlishi zarur. Jamiyatimiz uchun ogʻriqli boʻlgan va zaifroq, pa…
🤯1
(1/3) Bu yil Mustaqillik kuni arafasida nima haqida yozishni oʻylar ekanman, yil (rasman) siyosiy jihatdan juda faol oʻtganiga qaramay, qandaydir siyosiy befarqlik mavjudligi toʻgʻrisidagi xayollar qurshovida qoldim. Xuddi biror kitob oʻqiyapsiz yoki serial tomosha qilyapsiz, kitob yoki serial yarmiga kelganda esa syujet shu darajada odatiy tus oladiki, davomini oʻqish yoki tomosha qilishni xohlamaysiz. Nima sodir bo…
😱1
Дал небольшое интервью о внешней политике Узбекистана🇺🇿 в период Мирзиёева для Global Voices. Оно доступно на английском языке вот тут👉 http://surl.li/jwuvb Рассказал о том, отличается ли мирзиёевский внешнеполитический курс от каримовского, что мешает его эффективности, как воспринимается Китай и с какими вызовами предстоит столкнуться узбекской дипломатии в ближайшее время😈🤔
(4/4) 5-misol. Fuqarolarning nofaolligi. Aholining koʻpchiligi 2017-yilni katta his-hayajon bilan kutib olgani va keyingi bir necha yil ana shu his-hayajon saqlanib qolganini qayd etib oʻtmaslik mumkin emas. Turgʻunlikka yuz tutgan tizim hokimiyat almashishi bilan, haqiqatda, harakatga keldi. Biroq, muammo shundaki, haqiqiy siyosiy islohotlarning yetishmasligi yangilanib ulgurgan mexanizmlarning komfort zonasida qol…
(3/4) Oxir-oqibat, hokimiyat – xuddi oldingi 25 yilda boʻlgani singari – u yoki bu qarorlar qabul qilinadigan, real voqelikdan tashqaridagi dunyoga oʻtadi. Uning barqarorligiga asosiy tahdid ham aynan mana shunda. Byurokratik hisobotlar va bayonotlardagi «reallik»dan olingan maʼlumotlar asosida qabul qilingan qarorlar eng achinarli oqibatlarga olib kelishi mumkin. Kreml elitasi yolgʻon gapirishlariga yoʻl qoʻymaydi. …
(2/4) Endi esa prezidentlik saylovlarida partiyalardan koʻrsatilgan nomzodlar qo‘lga kiritgan ovozlarni aks ettiruvchi raqamlarga murojaat qilsak. O‘zLiDeP/«Milliy tiklanish» – 87,05%, «Adolat» – 4,43%, O‘zXDP – 4,02%, Ekologik partiya – 3,47%. Savol: partiyalarning elektorati qayerga gʻoyib boʻldi? Javob juda oddiy – u mavjud emas. Partiyalar hech qanday haqiqiy siyosiy faoliyat bilan shugʻullanmaganidan keyin, elek…
(1/4) Oʻzbekiston uchun qizgʻin oʻtayotgan 2023-yilning yarmi ortda qoldi. Hukumatimiz va uning targʻibotchilari taʼbiri bilan aytganda, Yangi Oʻzbekiston Konstitutsiyaga oʻzgartirishlar kiritish boʻyicha referendum va muddatidan oldin oʻtkazilgan prezidentlik saylovlari yakunlariga muvofiq rasman yangilanishni boshdan kechirdi. Mening nazarimda, Yangi O‘zbekiston konsepsiyasining o‘ziga boshidanoq shubha bilan qarag…
Французская🇫🇷 радиостанция RFi (@RFI_Ru ) попросила дать комментарий по поводу нашего очередного политического to’y👀 Комментарий в материале по ссылке👉 https://rfi.my/9iKd.g Год «выборов» без выбора продолжается😈🤔
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @powerofanalyticsuzb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 897,136 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Серия пенальти_O'Z” (@powerofanalyticsuzb), 89 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/powerofanalyticsuzb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.