Channel
@posle_kletki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003912988120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @posle_kletki |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 16 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/posle_kletki |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 14 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 15 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 15 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 15.0% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 12.5% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 10.0% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 10.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 7.50% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 5.00% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.50% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.50% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 2.50% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«🩵 🩵🩵🩵🩵 🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵…» — или как мужчина манипулирует, не собираясь выполнять Девушки, мы уже разбирали манипуляцию молчанием. Сегодня — про обещания. Про те самые, от которых внутри всё замирает, а потом оказывается, что это был просто красивый фантик. Я сама через это проходила. Не раз. И знаю, как это работает изнутри. Как понять, что тебя водят за нос? 🔹 Момент. Обещание всегда появляется в кризис. Когда ты уже по…
🔥1
И кстати, где мой рьяный поклонник, любитель цветочков и накидывать гов&о на вентилятор?🤓 Давно негативных лайков не было😁
Ну и в чем он не прав?🤣
"😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁😁 😁😁😁😁😁" Визуализация — это мощный инструмент, который помогает мозгу покинуть стрессовую ситуацию и перенестись в спокойное и расслабляющее пространство. - Закройте глаза и представьте, что вы находитесь в месте, где чувствуете абсолютное спокойствие и безопасность. - Визуализируйте все детали — окружение, звуки, запахи, ощущения на коже. - Проведите в своем "безопасном месте" несколько минут, позволяя с…
🙏2
Давно ничего не выкладывала здесь🥺 Но сегодня, одна милая девушка поделилась своей историей расставания и тем самым дала понять мне, что пора)))
Доброго утра🌞
❤1
File, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
😌😌😌☺️☺️ 😌☺️😌 😋😝😛 😉😌😛😉😋😉😉😌 🤓😌😌😌😝😌 Как часто вы ловите себя на этой мысли? Прямо в тот момент, когда хочется сказать «нет», а вы говорите «да». Когда хочется уйти, а вы остаётесь. Когда хочется сделать по-своему, а вы делаете как «правильно». 🙈 Спасибо родителям, которые с детства транслировали: «А что люди скажут?», «А как на это посмотрят?», «Ты же позоришь нашу семью!». Ну и вырос человек. К…
👏1🥰1
❤ Я поняла, что начинаю жить... Я столько лет жила в «счастливом» браке, Что все вокруг поверили всерьёз… Не видя безысходности атаки, Не замечая выплаканных слёз… Я столько лет носила маску эту С названием «Счастливая жена», Что за спиной шептались по секрету: «Нет никого, счастливей, чем она…» Я научилась мило улыбаться, Печаль скрывая от пытливых глаз… И уступать привыкла, и смиряться, Терпеть обиды злых колючи…
❤🔥3🔥2
Победить врага – значит больше о нём не думать. Жан-Кристоф Гранже 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠 💛💛💛
❤2
Продолжая изучать тему Нарциссов, которая мне очень близка, наткнулась на статью (нагло стибрила ее) и интервью Собчак и Гордон. Ксюша напрямую сказала Кате, что если она будет так г&вно выливать на своих клиентов, которые ушли, то другие побояться к ней даже заходить. Но нет! Желание обосрать публично, сильнее! Почему же? Потому что это поведение НЕ стратегия, а симптом, можно сказать, диагноз. Это классический…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @posle_kletki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“После клетки” (@posle_kletki), 14 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/posle_kletki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.