Channel
@portret_miller
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
477subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002100335404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @portret_miller |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/portret_miller |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 477 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 480 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 480 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 11 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 31.6% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 23.7% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 21.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2024 to 22 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Привет всем! Раскрою вам один секрет - наши художники всегда обращают внимание на детали, при написании портретов💫 Сегодня я предлагаю вам не только почувствовать себя творцами прекрасного, а еще и выиграть чудесные ПОДАРКИ от меня🎁 А именно: СКИДКУ 40% на ПОРТРЕТ + ИНТЕРЬЕРНУЮ КАРТИНУ в подарок! Все очень просто: ❗Найди 3 отличия на портретах ❗Присылай скрин с отметками недостающих деталей мне в ЛС ❗Получай сво…
👍6❤5❤🔥5
Комбинируем Сейчас будет интересно. Для всех-всех, кто интересовался этим вопросом "Комбинируем ли мы разные фотографии в одну" Делаем! И тут запросы разные. Из базовых: кидают отдельные фотографии или фото, где нужно всех собрать в одну линию. На фото второй вариант запроса. Конечно же, результат очень сильно зависит от качества фото. 💯 Качественное фото = качественная картина. Интересно было бы посмотреть на сб…
❤🔥2🔥2
НАКОНЕЦ-ТО ПЯТНИЦА!💃 Обожаю, когда впереди еще 2 выходных💕 А кто с нами давно, те знают, что пятница - это еще и время подарков и активностей от меня‼ Сегодня я предлагаю вспомнить всеми любимую игру ГОЛОВОЛОМКА💬 Правила очень простые: 🎁Среди множества букв, я зашифровала для вас несколько слов, связанных с моей сферой, которые станут вашим подарком. 🎁Присылай отгаданное слово мне в ЛС и получай гарантированный…
❤🔥2❤1
Лучше с или без ⁉️ Расскажу не, много про поталь🤌 Кто не знает, как она выглядит - смотрите видео. И тут опять дело вкуса. Лучше с поталью или без? Каждый вариант имеет свои плюсы. Портреты без потали выглядят классически и элегантно, подчеркивая красоту и индивидуальность модели. Однако добавление потали придаёт работе особую глубину и блеск, создавая игру света и тени. Посмотрите работу с поталью и без неё. Пиш…
❤3👍3❤🔥2
Какой твой выбор
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
Получила два отзыва на стиль Love is Читаю комментарий на втором фото и думаю "ваау, снова кого- то порадовали, всё получилось!". Моё счастье длилось до четвертого предложения😂 Впечатлена таким тактичным комментарием к работе, хоть и дело вкуса, как оказалось, но отметили, что качество было на высоте, очень вдохновляет, спасибо❤️ Вывод один: все очень разные! Всё таки интересно, за какой стиль будет больше голосов…
Про волосы😄 Знаете, что самое сложное в рисовании портретов? Не запутаться в волосах! 😂 Иногда кажется, что я рисую не портрет, а целую прическу. Но это всё часть процесса! Рисовала Зендею, как вам?😊 #портретыпофото #студияпортретов
🔥5
Ретро😎 В этом посте хочу показать одни из моих "старых" работ. 🖼 Хотели бы портрет в таком стиле? Какой нравится больше всего? пиши в комментариях 😊 #портретыпофото #студияпортретов
❤🔥1🔥1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @portret_miller. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой твой выбор
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2024 to 22 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Студия портретов Марии Миллер” (@portret_miller), 477 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/portret_miller.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.