Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PornStation Traffic

Channel

PornStation Traffic

@pornstation_joe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003964242900
TypeChannel
Username@pornstation_joe
Created10 April 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pornstation_joe

Growth

4951507 August 2026 — 49 subscribers10 August 2026 — 49 subscribers14 August 2026 — 51 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–51 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:3751+2
10 Aug 2026, 12:3149no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:0349first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 10 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
824.5%
avg views ÷ 51 subscribers
Avg views / post
421
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held10 (10 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total841
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1144.0%
🍌416.0%
😎312.0%
👍28.00%
🔥28.00%
🌚14.00%
👏14.00%
🤪14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC423 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Привет!🌹 Месяц назад к нам пришли две транс-модели, и сотрудничество оказалось очень успешным 🍌 💸ПОЭТОМУ ОФФЕР ОСТАЁТСЯ В СИЛЕ! 💸 🔥100 $ ЗА ТРАНС-МОДЕЛЬ, С КОТОРОЙ МЫ НАЧНЁМ ПОЛНОЦЕННУЮ РАБОТУ. ЕСТЬ ПОДХОДЯЩИЙ ЧЕЛОВЕК? НАПИШИТЕ МНЕ В ЛИЧНЫЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ. Самые лёгкие деньги для вас, пишите мне @jamesgypsy

21 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC418 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что-то я уже сто лет ничего не писал... 🤔 За последнее время накатывал кучу фиксов, чтобы сделать постинг максимально стабильным. Заодно расширили список поддерживаемых сайтов, так что теперь возможностей стало еще больше. И есть чем похвастаться. 😎 Наша модель уже третий раз выиграла приз за лучший пост дня на одном из сайтов! Учитывая, что там огромное количество моделей и очень высокая конкуренция, даже одна так

27 May 2026, 16:40 UTC≈2,140 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В связи с тем, что ТРАНС-МОДЕЛИ показали отличный результат, а софт под них уже полностью настроен и стабильно работает, хочу предложить вам действительно жирный оффер 👀 💸ТОТ, КТО ПРИВЕДЁТ НАМ ТРАНС-МОДЕЛЬ, С КОТОРОЙ МЫ НАЧНЁМ ПОЛНОЦЕННУЮ РАБОТУ, ПОЛУЧИТ 100$.💸 Да, всё серьёзно 😄 Так что ловите момент - можно не только помочь нам найти новых моделей, но ещё и неплохо заработать вместе.

3🌚1🤪1

27 May 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,500 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Открыт к новым идеям! Привет всем! На связи Джо( но меня начали в конторе называть Жоас, буду подписываться Жоас, так более экстравагантно😂) Недавно мне предложили поработать с ТРАНС-МОДЕЛЬЮ. Идея была интересная, но проблема заключалась в том, что весь софт изначально разрабатывался и настраивался исключительно под цис-девушек. Мало того что нужно было подбирать спец хештеги, заголовки и тд, на многих сайтах нуж

😎32

20 May 2026, 22:32 UTC≈1,150 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Порно тиктоки хуйня???😒 Даю фидбек и полезную инфу про сайты которые в данный момент не работают (или вообще не работали|а может я не шарю просто?😁) xhamster.com У меня были большие надежды когда я увидел что там есть шортсы (порно тиктоки) и +можно ставить фтл на онлик Спустя 1,5 месяца постинга крайне мало лидов (меньше 10🥲) Может я не нашел связку, тестил все варианты, хз xfree.com Отдельная долгая история.....

🍌4

19 May 2026, 17:27 UTC784 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Наш топовый кейс и как был достигнут такой результат Как вы видите на примере этого кейса, стабильная работа в долгую всегда даёт лучший результат. Данный аккаунт проливался практически год стабильной работы, и за это время постепенно росли охваты, просмотры и общая активность. Алгоритмы начинают лучше продвигать аккаунт, появляется больше трафика, а вместе с этим и больше шансов выйти на действительно крупных к

🔥2

16 May 2026, 16:09 UTC692 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что по крутым заголовкам?😎 Вы можете заметить, что на порнотиктоках очень часто по заголовкам сразу видно, где используется автоматизация. Обычно это либо одинаковые подписи под всеми постами, либо какой-то рандомный бред, который вообще не связан с видео. В PORNSTATION к вопросу заголовков подошли серьезно.💪 Мы долго накачивали AI, чтобы в итоге он делал максимально разнообразные и естественные подписи без постоя

1👏1

14 May 2026, 11:09 UTC619 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Почему именно PORNSTATION? 🤔 Многие спрашивают: «Зачем мне платить за софт, если я могу делать всё вручную?» Конечно, можете. Но давайте просто посчитаем. Чтобы загрузить ОДНО видео вручную, вам нужно: — обрезать ролик — уникализировать его — добавить музыку (если нужно) — загрузить видео — дождаться обработки — написать описание — добавить хэштеги — проверить публикацию В среднем на один сайт уходит до 15 минут.

2👍2

11 May 2026, 15:14 UTC494 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Привет! 👋 Давайте познакомимся. Меня зовут Джо, и я уже четвёртый год работаю в адалте. За это время я успел плотно поработать с трафиком в разных нишах и часто пользовался услугами различных подрядчиков, кто-то сдавал софт в аренду, кто-то предлагал трафик вместе с софтом. Но, если честно, качество этого софта меня очень часто смущало. В какой-то момент всё это вместе подтолкнуло меня к тому, чтобы самому заняться

3

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @pornstation_joe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 381,891 of 1,550,472entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PornStation Traffic” (@pornstation_joe), 51 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pornstation_joe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.