Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

PorcelainDevil✨

@porcelainDvl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

158subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002426156020
TypeChannel
Username@porcelainDvl
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/porcelainDvl

Growth

1589 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 158 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 02:12 — 158 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 01:469 Aug 2026, 02:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 157–159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 02:12158no change
9 Aug 2026, 01:46158first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 31 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
146.2%
avg views ÷ 158 subscribers
Avg views / post
231
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held15 (31 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,155
Reactions total247
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

700 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 537331004358631046318927.0%
custom 530326324156723832812517.9%
custom 530117713300189952111816.9%
custom 53822587926311213388812.6%
❤‍🔥8712.4%
custom 5303389865793057875608.57%
custom 5300843173524832522334.71%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 700reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @porcelainDvl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC172 views54 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Для nyokodes

custom 530117713300189952124custom 530326324156723832814custom 530084317352483252210custom 53033898657930578753custom 53822587926311213382custom 53733100435863104631

27 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC169 views41 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Наконец дошли руки до редрава референсов 2022 года. Первой под раздачу попала Элизабет В комменты кину старые рефы Юная леди остра на язык и мысль, но в критических ситуациях может держать под контролем свои слова и действия. Любит и активно использует черный юмор и стеб, но несмотря на это в стандартных ситуациях скупая на эмоции даже с близкими. Отталкивающе самоуверенная, колючая и очень больно колет в ответ, ес

custom 537331004358631046320custom 53011771330018995219custom 53822587926311213388custom 53032632415672383284

22 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC226 views44 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Выдохлась, последние @tonnerredepunk @Hiqqi_28 Всем спасибо за активность под постом, было трудно выбрать кого отрисовать🥺

custom 537331004358631046325custom 538225879263112133810custom 53032632415672383289

21 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC320 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Первые полетели, пока что цопики @Merrrine_M @Coff_Space17 @fuckingprincessofyouheart

custom 530117713300189952119❤‍🔥8custom 53008431735248325225custom 53032632415672383285custom 53822587926311213382

17 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC268 views69 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Хотела этим разрисоваться, а вышло в час по чайной ложке в течение двух недель У меня было миллион версий платьев Роксаны на ее первый бал, наконец, спустя столько попыток, я довольна тем, что реализовалось из той лютой солянки в голове. Вступление на должность и лютый slay 😈

❤‍🔥30custom 537331004358631046321custom 530338986579305787511custom 53008431735248325223custom 53011771330018995212custom 53032632415672383282

8 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC298 views50 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Неделька отдыха прошла на ура, надеюсь, вы не успели соскучиться! Событий тьма, все невероятные и потрясающие, как минимум, потому что всю неделю у меня жила Маренька и мы ползали по городу, рисовали вместе, вкусно кушали... Пора время разрисовываться, а значит, скоро начну сюда снова поститься поактивнее! Ловите пока прекрасных дам на разогрев

custom 530117713300189952122❤‍🔥12custom 530338986579305787510custom 53822587926311213386

27 Jun 2026, 15:22 UTC433 views58 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Разминочка, а то вдруг руки в жару уже атрофировались

custom 537331004358631046327custom 538225879263112133812custom 530338986579305787510custom 53032632415672383285custom 53011771330018995213custom 53008431735248325221

24 Jun 2026, 14:50 UTC375 views49 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Первая половина лета была ооочень дождливой,хотелось запечатлеть эту мокрую городскую атмосферу Легущь и недовольный ёжь Для ма лове оф май лаеф

custom 537331004358631046326custom 530326324156723832810❤‍🔥5custom 53822587926311213384custom 53008431735248325223custom 53033898657930578751

24 Jun 2026, 10:36 UTC299 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Что вам сказать? Венсдей, май дудес, держите жабу Скоро доделаю.......😼

custom 538225879263112133824custom 53011771330018995219custom 53033898657930578755❤‍🔥1

18 Jun 2026, 13:17 UTC347 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Первый месяц лета постепенно перевалил за свою середину, а значит… пора поделиться с вами крошкой новостей, чому тут пока так тихо. Пока идет замечательный доотпускной период, меня усадили в пришкольный лагерь к третьеклашкам 😮 Для учителя старшей школы это жуть Развлекаю себя раскрасками, которые мои коллеги печатали для детей, но древнее зло не дремлет и частично забирает у них развлечение. Пока что появился микрон

custom 530117713300189952115custom 530084317352483252210custom 53822587926311213388

17 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC244 views31 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @marya_belfegorovnaPhoto

Глаза разбегаются Трйд с Даречкой

custom 537331004358631046317custom 53011771330018995217custom 53032632415672383287

15 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC420 views60 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Трейд с F-chan's warehouse ✌️

❤‍🔥31custom 537331004358631046316custom 530326324156723832813

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @porcelainDvl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 437,964 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PorcelainDevil✨” (@porcelainDvl), 158 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/porcelainDvl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.