Channel
@porazhenec
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
141subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002195239770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @porazhenec |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/porazhenec |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 141 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:26 | 143 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 145 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 144 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 145 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 145 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 17 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 65 | 47.4% | |
| 🤮 | 25 | 18.2% | |
| 😁 | 24 | 17.5% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 5.84% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 5.84% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 3.65% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 2 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Остерегайтесь таких каналов, есть информация, что они связаны с мусорами. Эти страницы активно работают против мусульман, продвигая только хариджитскую тему, сеют фитну и отбивают желание помогать мусульманам. Так же не стоит скидывать им деньги и не обманывайтесь отчетами от них. Это не трудно сейчас сделать выдавая себя за мусульман. Также с начала освобождения лагеря они пугали депортацией про приказу сша, а тепер…
💯7
Поддерживаем
🤣7😁4
Или простые ППСники
💯6😁5
Хороший совет
💯7
Давайте посмотрим на исламских лидеров прошлого и на тех, кто претендует на эту роль в наши дни. Первые были правдивы и искренни; обладали мужеством и стойкостью; меняли мир и реальность, а не приспосабливались под них; жертвовали собой и своими интересами, всегда ставя на первое место интересы исламской Уммы. Если же мы посмотрим на тех, кто сегодня претендует на роль всевозможных «экспертов», «аналитиков», «лидер…
❤5👍4
О те, которые уверовали! Если нечестивец принесет вам весть, то разузнайте, чтобы не поразить по незнанию невинных людей, а не то вы будете сожалеть о содеянном. 49:6 Но, сегодня пораженец берет новость от неверующих и еще подтверждает их версию, обвиняя мусульманина может в том, что он не делал и не собирался делать.
💯9
Сегодня за ментов ведут медиа работу пораженцы. Ментам главное подкинуть оружие и подставить мусульманина, а пораженцы дальше расскажут вам, что это не подстава, а сам мусульманин виноват, связался с сектантами так сказать итд. Ментам даже утруждаться не надо )) всю работу за них сделают пораженцы. 16-летнего жителя КБР обвиняют в подготовке теракта против полицейских в Нальчике, сообщили в Следственном комитете РФ.…
💯9
https://t.me/porazhenec/125
🤮8
Удивляют сегодня бесхребетные блогеры, которые газуют на муфтият Дагестана, считая их заблудшими и в тоже время, называют хорошим аналитиком и четким братом того, кто рекламирует муфтият КБР, который пропагандирует Российские ценности на Кавказе.
💯10👍2🤝2
Так же самокритичный пораженец признал, что был чмошником годами))) пока не стал пропагандистом университета, который пропагандирует в свою очередь Российский мир на Кавказе.
💯9
Реклама университета с российской пропагандой от "неодеоккупантов" Кавказа
🤮6💯2
Пораженец, как и следовало ожидать, чтобы выйти из лужи в которую он сел, приплел нас зачем то к армии Сирии. Хотим его огорчить, что не находимся в армии Сирии. И причем вообще армия?))) Не получилось у пораженца с этим. А то, что пораженец рекламирует университет с российской пропагандой, так это очевидно.
💯4👍2🤮2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @porazhenec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пораженецы 👎🏻” (@porazhenec), 141 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/porazhenec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.