умами упапи🤔
🍓5❤3😍2🆒2

Channel
@poppynn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
181subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001901858025 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @poppynn |
| Description | autistic dyslexic bisexual sexy участница https://t.me/CDT_DISORDER лс: t.me/poppy_nn |
| Created | 29 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/poppynn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 181 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 181 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (15 June 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 507 |
| Reactions total | 55 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
125 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 38 | 30.4% | |
| custom 5447597047773410313 | 22 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5424650600878979720 | 19 | 15.2% | |
| 🍓 | 16 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5208582998219321558 | 7 | 5.60% | |
| custom 5413394006992243524 | 5 | 4.00% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 3.20% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 3.20% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 2.40% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.40% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 1.60% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.8% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.8% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
умами упапи🤔
🍓5❤3😍2🆒2
вчера выгуливали wda на ODC ! 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩⌨ спасибо огромное залу за вашу поддержку 🤩🤩🩶
🍓5custom 54475970477734103135custom 52085829982193215582custom 54246506008789797201
ХАЛЛЮ фест 18.07.26 ✨aespa - WDA✨ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🥇1 место в начиках !
❤5💅3😍2
что ж… иногда все начинается с простого 🥑♥️🌰 ALO — это про желание быть услышанными. как громкий клич, с которого начинается что-то новое мы — проектная команда, созданная андреем и наной 🤩 здесь каждый проект…отдельная история с новой концепцией, составом и идеями, которые мы будем воплощать вместе 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 —важен не только результат, но и путь к нему мы про творчество без рамок, вн…
custom 54475970477734103138custom 54246506008789797206custom 54133940069922435245❤1
it’s me 🤩 by 🌊🌊 (k-cover battle // 12.07)
custom 52085829982193215585
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 54246506008789797204
кортис 💗💗💗
💘1🙏1
Video message, posted without a caption
it’s meee 😊 12.06 будем гяру девочками на баттле
❤8custom 54246506008789797207
качаем вниз — кончаем вверх ! 😁
🔥4❤3custom 54475970477734103133
алошки кормят📞🔥
❤13custom 54475970477734103136🥰3
русские кортис (с лужей)
🍓6❤5custom 54246506008789797201
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @poppynn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 801,552 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“poppy nn| нана🎀” (@poppynn), 181 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poppynn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.